Lecture 12: Voting & Democracy Flashcards
The Median Voter Theorem
Parties move to the exact median of the distribution of voter preferences. In other words, they both offer the platforms most preferred by the median voter.
Subject to fail if:
1) Decisions are multidimensional (not likely)
2) Voters are unsure of the views of Candidates or Vice Versa
The Miracle of Aggregation
Implies that a highly uninformed electorate may- at the aggregate level - act as if it were perfectly informed. This is based on the idea that the uniformed voted “randomly.”
Ex:
90% of the population is totally ignorant. 10% are informed. Unibomber vs. Normal Guy. If the ignorant vote 50v50 and the informed all vote for the Normal Guy, then the better option still wins.
Caplan’s 4 systematic biases of voters
1) Anti-Market
2) Anti-Foreign
3) Make-Work
4) Pessimistic
Anti-Market Bias
A tendency to underestimate the economic benefits of the market mechanism.
Anti-Foreign Bias
A tendency to underestimate the economic benefits of interaction with foreigners.
Make-Work Bias
A tendency to underestimate the economic benefits of conserving labor.
Pessimistic Bias
A tendency to overestimate the severity of economic problems and underestimate the (recent) pas, present, and future performance of the economy.
What is the effect of Voter Bias on “The Miracle of Aggregation?”
In the presence of systematic bias, uninformed voters do not simply “flip a coin.” They are more likely to vote one way than another. Thus, the distribution of voter preference is skewed one direction or another. As a result the median voter does not represent the socially optimal outcome. Caplin argues this is “why democracies choose bad policies.”