Lecture 12 - Membership of Ltd Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Membership =

A

Legal ownership whole/ part shareholding in company. Evidenced by necessary entry in Register of Members

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Who can become member?

A

Anyone with legal capacity to enter contract can become member. No upper limit.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Termination of membership

A

Legally effective only when name owner removed from Register usually due to:

  • Transfer of shares
  • Death of member
  • Redemption of redeemable shares
  • Dissolution of company
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Register of members contains (4)

A
  • Names and addresses of members
  • Number and types of shares
  • Amounts paid up for shares
  • Dates of becoming and ceasing to be a member
    Must be kept up to date by company.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Shares in private company..

A

Very difficult to value, may not have finite value

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Rule/ Decisions of majority shareholders

A

Usually prevail. They have put in most money/ subject to most risk. Regardless wishes of minority.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Case for minority/ majority shareholders

A

Foss v Harbottle 1843 > Victoria park Manchester. Majority shareholders wanted to sell for fraction value. Court upheld views majority.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

General rule in majority vs minority (3)

A
  • Company is proper claimant (not individual shareholder)
  • Doesn’t apply to disputes between shareholders amongst themselves
  • Applies without exception where general meeting has power to and does permit act complained of
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Exceptions to rule (4)

A
  • Where acts complained of are illegal/ ultra vires (outside power company)
  • Where resolutions passed through trickery/ misuse proper procedures/ fraud
  • If negligent AND one or more majority interests profit
  • Majority cannot vote to pass resolution to forfeit rights minority in favour majority (Cook v Deeks 1910).
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Derivative actions CA 2006

A

New statutory procedure that allows shareholder to bring claim on behalf company for wrong done to company by directors/ others. But must obtain permission from court to continue with claim.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Derivative Claim case

A

Franbar Holdings Ltd v Patel 2008 > court refused permission continue with claim

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Unfair prejudice CA 2006

A

When company’s affairs are being conducted in manner that is unfairly prejudicial to shareholders generally or to some

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Unfair prejudice case

A

Cumana Ltd 1986 > Court will outlaw acts complained of if sufficiently unfair

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Court actions available to minorities (4)

A
  • Wind up company
  • Make regulations for future conduct
  • Injuction against acts complained of
  • Order purchase of minority shares by majority/ company
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Winding up company (liquidation)

A

Jurisdiction under The Insolvency Act 1986 - drastic step.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Case of winding up company (2)

A

May be appropriate ‘quasi-partnerships’ eg Westbourne Galleries Ltd 1972. Or where personal relationships paramount eg Jesner v Jarrad 1992.

17
Q

Injunct against acts complained of

A

Stop/ prevent acts eg Harmer Ltd 1958 > stamp collecting Grandad.

18
Q

Order of purchase minority shares by majority/ company

A

Mechanism for valuation shares must be comprehensive and binding on both sides

19
Q

Deadlock and motives

A

When voting rights are equal, and there are opposing views on policy and no casting vote.

20
Q

Cases on deadlock and motives (3)

A
  • West v Blanchet 2000 > Court decided most realistic offer should prevail eg who had money to buy other out
  • Astec plc 1999 > No purchase of minority shares allowed as minority had collateral purpose
  • London School of Electronics 1985 > court ordered purchase minority shares even though conduct minority also unfair. Teacher fired, LSE set up new BSc, teacher took 12 students with him