Lecture 11 - The Cold War Goes Global: The New Frontier, Modernization, and the Vietnam Quagmire Flashcards
How did the Cold War antagonism begin to evolve/change in the late 1950s?
♣ Stabilization of bipolar partition of Europe
♣ Decolonization and Nation Building
♣ Soviet activism (Khrushchev and post-Stalinist leadership) and Chinese challenge
♣ Emergence of alternative “Third-worldisms” (spirit of Bandung) - window of opportunity on both sides of the iron curtain in order to expand influence and power.
♣ Revolutionary/Nationalist challenges. E.g.: Cuba and Vietnam
Vienna Summit
06/1961 - Change in the European theater. Kennedy and Khrushchev reach détente. The Berlin question, the Laos question, bay of pigs invasion
Hotel Theresa, Harlem
09/1960 Cuba emancipating itself form American influence. Castro goes to New York for a UN GA and sets up the delegation HQ in Harlem, not in Manhattan – symbolic meeting with Malcolm X. Cuba not only as a challenge to the capitalist system but also to racial discrimination.
The Bandung Conference
04/1955—a meeting of Asian and African states, most of which were newly independent. A consensus was reached in which “colonialism in all of its manifestations” was condemned, implicitly censuring the Soviet Union, as well as the West.
Kennedy Administration
♠ Liberalism v. Eisenhower/Dulles Conservatism
♠ Technocracy v. Ideology
♠ Generational Shift
Kennedy’s foreign policy
♠ Flexible Response
♠ Against nuclearized/autonomous West europe
♠ Projected Idealism, eg. Peace Corps
♠ Modernization Third World (Vs. neutralism)
New Look (policy)
It reflected Eisenhower’s concern for balancing the Cold War military commitments of the United States with the nation’s financial resources. The policy emphasized reliance on strategic nuclear weapons to deter potential threats, both conventional and nuclear, from the Eastern Bloc of nations headed by the Soviet Union.
Flexible response (policy)
♠ Vs. rigidity New Look/Massive retaliation
♠ Global/Symmetrical strategy
♠ Third World and guerrilla (heyday of counterinsurgency)
♠ Military Keynesianism and growth of defense expenditures
JFK’s Idealism: Peace Corps speech
03/1961 - “This Corps will be a pool of trained American men and women sent overseas by the U.S. Government or through private institutions and organizations to help foreign countries meet their urgent needs for skilled manpower.”
Success of (and fascination with) modernization theories
♠ Product of Zeitgeist (Modern Industrial Age)
♠ Cold War: competition between alternative models paths to modernity/teleologies
♠ US and Soviet experience: 1930s, New Deal and 5-year plans
Assumptions Modernization
♠ Political radicalism = Poverty & Social Injustice
♠ Universal and linear path to Modernity:
progressive determinism/gradualistic evolutionism v. class conflict
♠ Analytical and Policy Power of Social Sciences (scientism)
♠ Multidimensional integrated approach:
political/social/economic/cultural level (+ security)
♠ Government activism: public investments → social reform (keynesianism, liberalism)
♠ US as “universally reproducible” model alternative to Marxism/revolutionary nationalism (excpetionalism)
The Stages of Economic Growth (Rostow from MIT, published in 1960) as crucial book: ‘A non-Communist Manifesto’
[Communism as] Disease of the transition to modernization.
[Marxists as] the scavengers of the modernization process. They prey on every division, weakness, and uncertainty that is likely to beset a society in the process of its transition to a modern world.
What reforms should be achieved through the application of modernization recipes to less developed countries? (Rostow)
♠ Investments in Technology: Productivity ♠ Consumption & High Salaries ♠ Land Reform ♠ Education & Literacy ♠ Demographic control
Political outcome of Modernization: formula
- Socio-economic development leading to industrialization, urbanization, wealth and education
- Leading to an open class system and a large middle class: demographic transition and stability
What were the basic (and inner) contradictions of Kennedy’s modernization strategies?
♠ Neglect of local/regional peculiarities. Cultural imperialism?
♠ Lack or weakness of local partners/interlocutors
♠ Faith in technocracy/knowledge and its applicability to the ‘political’ and the ‘social’
♠ Time constraints
♠ «Security» as a precondition for reform: military modernization?