Lecture 11 - Cognitive factors in emotion Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

(lecture):

Describe appraisal theory.

A

(lecture) :
- The basic claim of all appraisal theories is that emotion is based on an appraisal of the meaning and significance of an event
- Lazarus is one of the most influential appraisal theorists
- He (Lazarus, 1991) distinguished between

> primary appraisal (“whether something of relevance to the person’s well-being has occurred” [p. 133])

> secondary appraisal (“concerns coping options – that is, whether any given action might prevent harm, ameliorate it, or produce additional harm or benefit” [p. 133])

> reappraisal (“distinguished from appraisal only by coming later” and by the fact that it includes “appraisals that are constructed by the mind to regulate emotional distress or protect one’s ego-identity” [p. 134])

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

(lecture):

Describe Lazarus’ 6 appraisal components

A

(lecture):

Primary appraisal

  • goal relevance (cf. Frijda’s [1988] law of concern: “Emotions arise in response to events that are important to the individual’s goals, motives, or concerns” [p. 351])
  • goal congruence or incongruence
  • type of ego-involvement (e.g., self-esteem, or moral values, or life goals)

Secondary appraisal

  • blame or credit (who is accountable or responsible?)
  • coping potential (how can I deal with this situation?)
  • future expectancy (are things likely to change for better or worse?)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

(lecture):

Describe 2 studies that answer this question:
Is emotion caused by appraisal?

What are the problems of these lines of evidence?

A

(lecture):

Empirical evidence:

Laboratory experiments
e.g., Speisman et al. (1964)
(see slide 7-8)

Correlational studies
e.g., Smith and Ellsworth (1985)
(see slide 9-10)

Problems:

In experimental research

  • often no measure of appraisal
  • what is it exactly that is being manipulated?
  • strength of emotion is shown to vary, not the quality

In correlational research

  • no manipulation
  • often dependent on memory
  • are we aware of ongoing appraisals?
  • what about emotions with sudden onset?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

(lecture):

Read slides 12-17

A

(lecture):

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

(lecture study question 1):

What is the key difference between Schachter’s two-factor theory and Lazarus’ appraisal theory with respect to the role of cognition in the emotion process?

A

(lecture study question 1):

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

(lecture study question 2):

What are the three main types of appraisal, according to Lazarus?

A

(lecture study question 2):

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

(lecture study question 3):

What is the difference between ‘goal relevance’ and goal congruence’, according to Lazarus, and how do these appraisals influence emotion?

A

(lecture study question 3):

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

(lecture study question 4):

What are the strengths and weaknesses of experimental versus correlational studies of the appraisal–emotion relation?

A

(lecture study question 4):

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

(lecture study question 5):

On what grounds did Zajonc object to the idea that appraisals are the basis of emotion?

A

(lecture study question 5):

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly