Lecture 10B: Personality and Social Interaction Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What are the three mechanisms of social interaction?

A

Personality interacts with situations in three ways:

  • Selection (what kind of people we select based on personality)
  • Evocation (our personality elicits certain responses from other)
  • Manipulation (tactics of social influence used to
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is selection?

A
  • Personality characteristics of others influence whether we select them as friends, dates or mates
  • Our personality characteristics play role in kinds of situations we select to enter and stay in
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What did the study on desirable personality characteristics in a marriage partner find?

A
  • Over 10,000 participants, from 37 samples in 33 countries, six continents, five islands (Buss et al., 1990)
  • Activity Instructions: evaluate the importance of various factors in choosing mate (range from 0 – unimportant to 3 – indispensible)
  • Mutual attraction/love is the most favored characteristic
  • Beyond love, top choices were personality characteristics (dependable character, emotional stability, pleasing disposition)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is assortative mating?

A
  • People are married to people who are similar to themselves
  • Couples show positive correlation on a variety of features, both physical (e.g., height, earlobe length!) and personality traits
  • Are these positive correlations caused by active selection of mates who are similar, or by-products of other causes (e.g., sheer proximity)?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

How did Botwin et al (1997) study dating and married couples?

A
  • Correlated preferences for Big 5 personality characteristics desired in a potential mate, and person’s own personality characteristics
  • Correlations are consistently positive: Positive correlations between own personality and ideal partner personality are due, in part, to direct social preferences, based on personality characteristics of those doing the selecting
  • Correlations between preferences for ideal personality characteristics in a mate and the actual personality characteristics of an obtained mate
  • Consistently (modest, but) positive correlations: People seem to get mates they want in terms of personality
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is a romantic ideal?

A
  • Romantic ideals: how close is the person you’re with to your ideal mate? The closer they are the higher the level of relationship satisfaction
  • From nice to passive- overtime nice becomes passive and annoying because they are always accommodating you and you don’t get to know them. Leads to dissolution
  • From strong to stubborn- you want someone with a strong personality but they become difficult to live with because they are unwilling to compromise and change
  • From funny to flaky- want someone with a sense of humour and excitement but over time funny tends to turn into immature, lack of responsibility and they lack seriousness.
  • From outgoing to over the top- desirable to be with someone social and outgoing but over time it becomes difficult because they talk too much, don’t relax, always on the go
  • From caring to clingy- desire to have a caring and supportive mate but over time can become suffocating
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

But are people who get what they want happier with their marriage than those who don’t?

A
  • People are especially happy if they are married to partners high on agreeableness, emotional stability, openness
  • “honeymoon effect” (see them as higher in these desirable traits art first, but over time these drop. If they drop quickly, divorce is more likely)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is the violation desire theory?

A
  • According to violation of desire theory (Buss, 1994), break-ups should be more common when one’s desires are violated than when they are fulfilled
  • People actively seek mates who are dependable and emotionally stable, and those who fail to choose such mates are at risk for divorce
  • Those who fail to get what they want—including a mate who is similar—tend to selectively break up more often than those who get what they want
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are some examples of how personality affects the situations we select?

A

Personality affects situations to which people are exposed through selective entry into, or avoidance of, certain activities

  • Empathy and community volunteering
  • Psychoticism and spontaneous, volatile situations
  • Shyness and avoidance of interactions
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is evocation?

A
  • Once we select other to occupy our social environment, second class of processes set into motion- evocation of reactions from others and evocation of our reaction by others (This is unintentional).
  • Personality characteristics of others evoke responses in us
  • Our personality characteristics evoke responses in others
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

How does aggression evoke hostility?

A
  • Aggressive people evoke hostility from others
  • Hostile attributional bias: tendency to infer hostile intent on the part of others in the face of uncertain behaviour from others (lab studies)
  • Because they expect others to be hostile, aggressive people treat others aggressively - people treated aggressively tend to aggress back
  • Thus, hostility from others is evoked by an aggressive person
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

How does the evocation of anger and upset work between partners?

A
  1. Person can perform actions that evoke emotional response in the partner (direct response)
  2. Person can elicit actions from the partner that upset the original elicitor (indirect repsone)
    a. Not necessarily doing anything wrong, but your lack of action upsets the partner
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Describe the study by Buss (1991) on the role of personality on evocation of anger and upset in married couples

A
  • Assessed personality characteristics of husbands and wives

- Strongest predictors of upset are low agreeableness and emotional instability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is expectancy confirmation?

A

People’s beliefs about personality characteristics of others cause them to evoke in others actions that are consistent with initial beliefs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What did Snyder and Swan find about expectancy confirmation?

A

People’s beliefs led them to behave in an aggressive manner toward an unsuspecting target, then the target behaved in a more aggressive manner, confirming initial beliefs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is manipulation?

A
  • Personality is linked to ways in which we try to influence or manipulate others
  • Manipulation (social influence) includes ways in which people intentionally alter, change or exploit others
17
Q

What is the taxonomy of manipulation tactics?

A

Buss et al (1987) developed a taxonomy through a 2 step process:

  • Nominations of acts of influence
  • Factor analysis of self reports and observer reports of nominated acts
  • 11 manipulation tactics identified (Charm, coercion, silent treatment, reason, regression, self-abasement, responsibility invocation, hardball, pleasure induction, social comparison, monetary reward)
18
Q

What two perspectives can manipulation be examined with in personality psych?

A

Manipulation can be examined from two perspectives within personality psychology

  • Are some individuals consistently more manipulative than others?
  • Given that all people attempt to influence others, do stable personality characteristics predict tactics that are used?
19
Q

What are the personality predictors of manipulation tactics (Buss, 1992)

A
  • High extraversion/dominance: coercion, responsibility invocation
  • Low extraversion/ dominance: self abasement, hardball (e.g., deception, violence)
  • High agreeableness: pleasure induction, reason
  • Low agreeableness (low empathy) : coercion, silent treatment
  • High in conscientiousness: reason
  • Emotionally unstable ppl use a variety of tactics to manipulate others, but the most common is regression tactic
  • High intellect openness: reason, pleasure induction, responsibility invocation
  • Low intellect-openness: social comparison
20
Q

What is Machiavellianism?

A

Manipulative strategy of social interaction, personality style that uses other people as tools for personal gain

21
Q

Describe the machiavellian personality

A
  • People who score high on machiavellianism (“high machs”) select situations that are loosely structured, untethered by rules that restrict the deployment of exploitative strategy
  • High machs tend to evoke specific reactions from others, such as anger and retaliation for having been exploited
  • High machs manipulate others in predictable was using tactics that are exploitative, self serving, and deceptive
22
Q

What is narcissism?

A
  • style of inflated self-admiration and constant attempt to draw attention to self and keep others focused on self.
  • High narcissism defined by being exhibitionistic, grandiose, self-centered, interpersonally exploitative
23
Q

How do narcissists select, evoke and manipulate their social interactions?

A
  • Selection: Associate with people who admire them, who will reflect positive view they hold of themselves
  • Evocation: Exhibitionism splits people—some view them as brilliant and entertaining, others as selfish and boorish
  • Manipulation: Highly exploitative of others
24
Q

What did the 24 year personality study by Twenge et al (2007) find?

A
  • 24 year old personality study
  • Steady increase in the rate of narcissism
  • Narcissism more prevalent in college students born after 1982
25
Q

Why is narcissism more prevalent?

A
  • Teaching self-esteem in school backfired? Participation awards
  • Increased prevalence of “me-centred” blogging and social networking websites
  • The selfie syndrome reflects a facet of narcissism that is facilitated or gratified by social media.
  • Facebook and facets of narcissism. Used self-esteem scale and narcissist personality inventory. Updating status, posting pictures, and using a lot of quotes or mantras were all associated with higher scores of narcissism and lower scores on self-esteem
26
Q

Describe the Manipulation tactic: Charm

A

I try to be loving when I ask him/her to do it

27
Q

Describe the Manipulation tactic: Coercion

A

I yell at him or her until they do it

28
Q

Describe the Manipulation tactic: Silent Treatment

A

I don’t respond until they do it

29
Q

Describe the Manipulation tactic: Reason

A

I explain why I want him/her to do it

30
Q

Describe the Manipulation tactic: regression

A

I whine until he/she does it

31
Q

Describe the Manipulation tactic: self-abasement

A

I act submissive so he/she will do it

32
Q

Describe the Manipulation tactic: responsibility invocation

A

I get them to make a commitment to do it

33
Q

Describe the Manipulation tactic: hardball

A

I hit him/her so that they will do it

34
Q

Describe the Manipulation tactic: pleasure induction

A

I show him/her how much fun it will be to do it

35
Q

Describe the Manipulation tactic: social comparison

A

I tell him/her that everyone is doing it

36
Q

Describe the manipulation tactic: monetary reward

A

I offer him/her money so that he/she will do it