LECTURE 10: EVALUATING GENOMIC VARIANTS Flashcards
Why do genetic testing? = 7
1 * Accurate molecular diagnosis
* facilitates access to appropriate treatment and services
* Ends “diagnostic odyssey”
2 * Disease prognosis
* severity of disease, disease course and survival
3 * Cascade screening (Identification of at-risk, asymptomatic family
members)
* surveillance and preventive measures
* informed reproductive choices
4 * Screening (neonatal, carrier testing)
* (pre-natal, pre-implantation, pre-symptommatic, and post-natal)
* early detection and treatment can prevent irreversible consequences
* informed reproductive choices
5 * Disease and treatment monitoring
* response to treatment, relapse
* drug sensitivity and resistance
6 * Enrolment into clinical trials
* Included on disease-specific patient registries
7 * Rationale therapeutic design for medical research
- Especially gene therapy
Recap on a couple of definitions: 4
1 * Pathogenic variant: capable of causing disease.
2 * Benign variant: not harmful in effect (e.g. no negative change in phenotype).
3 * Be careful of “mutation” (variable usage) – strictly speaking these are ONLY pathogenic/disease-causing variants.
4 * Be careful of “polymorphism” (variant that is common in a normal population, usually considered >1%) – e.g. a benign variant.
Diagnostic variant detection is targeted = 8
1 * In diagnostics, investigation of variants is usually “targeted”
2 * focus on a specific gene location, size or region, and/or type of variant:
3 * Exonic and splice-site sequences;
4 * Gains/losses larger than a predetermined minimum size
5 * Disease-associated:
6 * Recurrent mutations
7 * Genes, or regions within genes (e.g. “hot spots”, or panels of known associated genes)
8.* In research, the net is usually cast far wider, even as wide as whole exomes or whole genomes (becomes very time-consuming).
Diagnostic variant detection is targeted
- These restrictions are chosen because: 3
1 * Ease of interpretation
2 * Proven clinical utility
3 * Limited resources (staff, consumables, equipment)
Not all variants in an individual’s DNA are
disease-causing = 5
1 * For example:
2 * If we were to sequence an individual’s BRCA1 gene we might detect a list of several DNA variants.
3 * The task is then to determine which of those variants are disease causing…
4 * i.e. likely to affect gene expression or protein function in a detrimental manner
5 * Perhaps one will be. Perhaps none will be.
Diagnostic lab performs genetic tests:
Whole gene sequencing (screening) VS
Genotyping(known variant detection)
Molecular interpretation
Does the variant have a functional
effect?
Example: The variant detected is rare,
predicted to affect protein function, and
shown to affect protein function in a
mouse model.
Clinical interpretation
Is the variant relevant to the clinical
the question being asked?
Example: The variant has been identified
in other patients with the same clinical
features, the zygosity and familial segregation fits with the inheritance pattern for this disease
Genotyping(known variant detection)
Molecular interpretation of the variant present or absent
Clinical interpretation Is the variant relevant to the clinical the question being asked?
Example: The result is consistent with
patient features and findings from
other diagnostic tests.
— Lab reports test result
Steps in Determining Variant Pathogenicity = 12
1 * Is the variant known, or novel?
2 * Databases of disease-associated variants
3 * HGMD, ClinVar
4 * disease-specific or locus-specific databases
5 * Databases of “normal” variants
6 * dbSNP, ExAC, gnomAD, exome variant server
7 * >5 minor allele frequency (MAF) variants are immediately excluded
8 * Seen Locally?
9 * Maybe just not published, or a sequencing/aligning error?
10. * OMIM, Gene Reviews, published literature
11 * Critically appraise the evidence
12 * Do you agree with previous opinions? Do you think this is pathogenic
or not?
First Principles = 10
1 * Generally assumed nonsense and frameshift variants are diseasecausing, provided that a loss of function/haploinsufficiency/dominant
negative effect is supported (might be recessive Vs dominant).
2 * Generally assumed synonymous variants and those not near genes are
not disease causing.
3 * Missense more difficult to predict, may have:
4 * no effect
5 * loss of function
6 * gain of function
7 * Both deletions and duplications can cause disease
8 * More likely if large
9 * Less likely if agenic (not in a gene) *
10. breakpoints may interrupt genes or create fusion genes
sequence variants vs copy number variants
table…important on slide 15
Revisit types of mutations = 6
1 * Mutation:
* change in DNA sequence (compared to normal sequence) that is disease-causing.
2 * Mode of inheritance
* Dominant, recessive, autosomal, X-linked
3 * Alleles/zygosity
* Heterozygous, homozygous, compound heterozygous, hemizygous
4 * Genomic location
* Coding, promoter/regulatory, splice-site
5 * Molecular change
* Substitution (synonymous, non-synonymous, missense, nonsense)
* Deletion/insertion, expansion/contraction
6 * Functional effect
* Loss or gain of function
Types of mutations - location
diagram on slide 17
Revisit types of mutations - Zygosity = 4
1 * Homozygous
* Same mutation present on both alleles
2 * Heterozygous
* Mutation present on one allele only
3 * Compound heterozygous
* Two different mutations present, one on each allele
4 * Hemizygous
* A mutation on one allele, and the other allele is absent
Types of mutations – mode of inheritance = 2
1 * Recessive disease
* Requires 2 recessive alleles
* Homozygous or compound heterozygous state
* OR, requires 1 mutant allele only if other allele is absent (hemizygous)
2 * Dominant disease
* Requires 1 dominant allele
* Heterozygous state
De novo and inherited mutations in autosomal dominant disease =4
- If the variant is de novo more likely to be disease-causing…
- Variant detected in one parent = less
likely to be disease-causing - Variant not detected in either parent = more likely to be causally linked
- Severe congenital autosomal
- dominant disorder:
- Variant detection.
Variants in trans or in cis
Autosomal recessive disease results from a loss of function mutation on both alleles