Lecture 10 Flashcards
Popper’s falsification
- Theories are bold conjectures that can be tested by observations
- Theory-free observation is impossible but also not needed
- Induction is impossible
- Instead we use deduction: theories used to derive predictions about observations
- Known as critical rationalism
Popper on how theories are constructed
They are constructed from the mind. Then predictions are derived from it. These are tested through observation.
Th hypothetico-deductive model
- Start with theory
- Deduce predictions from theory
- Test predictions
- If predictions don’t come true then falsify theory
- If they do come true then corroboration
Demarcation criterion
Distinguishes science from pseudoscience
General vs conditional
What or who does the hypothesis pertain to?
Example: All women with blue jeans and brown hair, wear a red t-shirt
This is not as falsifiable as saying: all women wear a red t-shirt
Precise vs imprecise
How precise is the hypothesis in what it predicts?
Example: All women wear a red t-shirt and blue jeans and have brown hair.
This is more precise and more falsifable than saying: all women wear a red t-shirt.
Problems with falsification
- Popper cannot distinguish between well supported and less well supported theories
- Theories are at best only not yet refuted
- The Quine-Duhem thesis
The Quine-Duhem thesis
- If a prediction doesn’t come true it could be because of the theory
- But it could also be something else
- Wrong measurements, instruments etc.
- Theory is never tested in isolation
Paradigm shifts (Thomas Kuhn)
Theories often break with their predecessors. This is also called relativism.
Example: Newton to Einstein
Paradigms in psychology
Psychology mostly only has local paradigms.
The paradigms are mostly methodological rather than substantive.
Feyerbend’s anarchism
He denies the existence of methodological guidelines ensuring the progress of science.
Anything goes when doing science.
Sophisticated falsificationism (Lakatos)
- Direct falsification will be very rare
- Researchers don’t give up their theories easily but will switch to a new better one
- Falsification as demarcation but not a descriptive principle
Lakatos’ research programmes
- Progressive progammes: growth, new techniques, more facts
- Degenerative programmes: shrinkage, no new techniques, no increase in facts
- Normative component: a rational scientist should only do progressive research programmes and not degenerative ones.