lecture 1 Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What are the two main categories of law?

A

Public Law (governs state functions) and Private Law (governs relationships between individuals).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are the primary sources of Scots Law?

A

Legislation, Judicial Precedent, Authoritative Writings, and Custom and Equity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the principle of Stare Decisis?

A

It is the legal principle that requires lower courts to follow the precedents set by higher courts.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Define an Invitation to Treat and give an example.

A

An invitation to negotiate, not an offer. Example: Items displayed in a shop window (Fisher v Bell).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

case summery of Fisher v Bell

A

Facts: A shopkeeper, Mr. Bell, displayed a flick knife in his shop window with a price tag. At the time, it was illegal in the UK to offer such knives for sale under the Restriction of Offensive Weapons Act 1959. The police charged the shopkeeper, arguing that he had offered the knife for sale in violation of the law.
Legal Issue: The central question was whether the display of the knife in the shop window constituted an “offer for sale” or merely an “invitation to treat”.
Court’s Decision: The court ruled that the display of the knife was not an offer but an invitation to treat. This means it was simply an invitation for customers to make an offer to purchase the item. Mr. Bell was not guilty because he had not made a legal “offer for sale.”
Key Legal Principle: Invitation to Treat vs. Offer
Invitation to Treat: An indication that a person is willing to negotiate, but it is not a binding offer. Examples include:
Goods displayed in a shop window or on shelves.
Advertisements in newspapers or online.
Offer: A definitive proposal that, if accepted, forms a binding contract.
Importance of the Case
Fisher v Bell established that goods displayed in a shop window are not offers but invitations to treat. This distinction is crucial because it protects shopkeepers from being legally bound to sell every item displayed, especially if there is limited stock or if the item cannot legally be sold.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

When can an offer be revoked?

A

An offer can be revoked anytime before acceptance is communicated (Byrne v Van Tienhoven).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Byrne v Van Tienhoven (1880)

A

Byrne v Van Tienhoven (1880) is a key case in contract law about cancelling offers. Van Tienhoven made an offer to sell goods to Byrne. Before Byrne received the offer, Van Tienhoven sent a letter cancelling it. However, Byrne accepted the offer as soon as it arrived, before getting the cancellation letter. The court decided that the cancellation wasn’t valid because Byrne didn’t know about it before accepting the offer. This case set the rule that an offer can only be cancelled if the offeree knows about the cancellation before they accept it. If acceptance happens first, a contract is formed, and the cancellation doesn’t count.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is a Unilateral Contract?

A

A contract in which an offer is made to the public and can be accepted by performing a specific act (Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co).

A unilateral contract is a type of agreement in which one party makes an offer that can be accepted by the performance of a specific act, rather than by a reciprocal promise. In such contracts, the contract is only formed once the act is completed.

For example, if someone offers a reward for the return of a lost item, they are making a unilateral contract. The contract is completed only when someone finds and returns the item.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

(Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co).

A

Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co (1893) is a famous contract law case that established the concept of a unilateral contract. The Carbolic Smoke Ball Company advertised that it would pay £100 to anyone who used their “smoke ball” product as instructed and still caught the flu. The company even claimed it had deposited £1,000 in the bank to show it was serious. Mrs. Carlill used the product but still got sick and sued the company for the promised £100 reward. The company argued that the advertisement was just marketing and not a real offer. The court disagreed, ruling that the ad was a clear, binding offer to the public, as the company showed intent to be legally bound by setting aside money. This case confirmed that a unilateral offer (an offer made to the whole world) can be accepted by performing the specified act, without needing to notify the offeror first.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What must happen for acceptance to be effective in contract law?

A

Acceptance must be clearly communicated to the offeror (Entores v Miles Far East).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Entores Ltd v Miles Far East Corp (1955)

A

Entores Ltd v Miles Far East Corp (1955) is a key case in contract law about the communication of acceptance. In this case, Entores, based in London, made an offer via telex (an early electronic communication system) to Miles Far East Corp, based in Amsterdam. The acceptance was sent back via telex from Amsterdam to London. The issue was where the contract was formed: in London (where the acceptance was received) or in Amsterdam (where it was sent). The court ruled that the contract was made in London because acceptance is only valid when it is received by the offeror, not when it is sent. This case established the rule that in instant forms of communication (like email or telex), acceptance must reach the offeror to be effective.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What does the Consumer Rights Act 2015 regulate?

A

It regulates unfair terms in consumer contracts, ensuring they are fair, reasonable, and transparent.
Under the CRA 2015, a consumer has a legal right to reject goods that are faulty (i.e., not of satisfactory quality, unfit for purpose or not as described) and obtain a full refund. However, the consumer must act quickly once the fault is discovered.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is the difference between Public Law and Private Law?

A

Public Law governs state interactions (e.g., criminal law), while Private Law governs relationships between private parties (e.g., contract law).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is the highest civil court in Scotland?

A

The Court of Session, divided into the Inner and Outer Houses.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is the role of the High Court of Justiciary in Scotland?

A

It handles serious criminal cases, such as murder and rape, and serves as the supreme criminal court.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What are the duties of an agent in Agency Law?

A

An agent must act in the best interests of the principal, avoid conflicts of interest, and disclose any personal interests.

17
Q

What is Vicarious Liability?

A

It is the legal principle where an employer is held liable for the wrongful acts of its employees if the acts are closely connected to their employment (Lister v Hesley Hall).

18
Q

Lister v Hesley Hall Ltd (2002)

A

Lister v Hesley Hall Ltd (2002) is a key case in vicarious liability, where the House of Lords ruled that an employer can be held responsible for wrongful acts of an employee if there is a close connection to their job duties. In this case, a boarding school warden sexually abused children in his care. The court decided that the school was vicariously liable because the abuse was closely linked to the warden’s duties of supervising and caring for the children. This case established the “close connection” test, expanding employer liability even for intentional or criminal actions if they are tied to the employee’s role.

19
Q

What is the test for a Primary Victim in Delict (Tort Law)?

A

The victim must be directly involved in the incident and within the area of potential harm (Page v Smith).

20
Q

Page v Smith (1996)

A

Page v Smith (1996) is an important case about claiming for mental harm after an accident. In this case, Mr. Page was in a minor car crash caused by Mr. Smith. Although Mr. Page was not physically hurt, the accident made his existing health condition (chronic fatigue syndrome) worse. The court decided that Mr. Smith was responsible for this, even though he didn’t expect mental harm to happen. The ruling was that if any physical harm was possible in an accident, then the person involved can also claim for any mental harm suffered. This case made it clear that direct victims of an accident can get compensation for mental injuries, even if those injuries weren’t predictable.

21
Q

What is a key influence on Scots Law from Roman Law?

A

Roman Law principles influenced areas like property and contract law, brought back by Scots law students who studied in Europe.

22
Q

What was the impact of the Act of Union 1707 on Scots Law?

A

It united the parliaments of Scotland and England but allowed Scotland to retain its own distinct legal system.

23
Q

What is Judicial Review in Scots Law?

A

It is the process where courts review the legality of decisions or actions made by public bodies.

24
Q

What legal principle protects consumers from unfair exclusion clauses?

A

The Consumer Rights Act 2015 ensures exclusion clauses are fair and transparent.

25
Q

What are the three possible verdicts in Scottish Criminal Law?

A

Guilty, Not Guilty, and Not Proven.

26
Q

What was a major consequence of Scotland joining the European Economic Community (EEC) in 1973?

A

Scots law began to incorporate European legal principles, especially in areas like consumer protection and employment law.

27
Q
A