Leases & Licences * Flashcards
Why are leases safer than licences?
- Leases create legal interest in the land, can bind 3rd parties
- Protected by legislation
- Gives exclusive possession. (vs permission to occupy)
Requirements for a lease: [4]
[Street v Mountford]
- Exclusive possession
- At best rate
- Term Certain
- Formalities
How can a licencee get protection?
If the contract is like a lease= courts will treat it as a lease.
If ≥ 6 months, tenant may seek protection from Landlord and Tenant Act 1954
(grants permission to stay on expiry and request renewal on same terms)
An example of INDEPENDENT agreements (Hint: 4 rooms to separate individuals at different times and under independent agreements) [PRETENCE]
AG Securities v Vaughan
• Court will look into substance and reality of transaction (not just apparent form)
Example of INTERDEPENDENT agreements (Hint: Unmarried couple, owner insisted they enter separate agreements w a clause letting the owner occupy the flat or nominate another to occupy the flat)
Antoniades v Villers
• Lease if all parties exclusive possession intended
Example of UNITY OF INTEREST in agreements [NOT A JOINT LEASE] (Hint: Identical licences, one person wanted to move out and other couldn’t pay)
Mikeover Ltd v Brady
- 2 agreements imposed on each tenant individual and separate obligations
- If only exclusive possession but NO unity of interest and joint tenancy.
“Contractual Lease” = tenancy creating proprietary interest
Lease can be created even where leasor does not have right to issue a lease
Bruton v London and Quadrant Housing Trust
- Agreement fulfilled all tenancy requirements.
- Tenancy creates interest (not other way)
Leases granted out of a licence are revoked when the licence is removed (Related to Bruton)
Kay v Lambeth
• When Lambeth terminated LQ Housing Trust’s licence, tenancies granted were extinguished
• Sought to rely on Art8 ECHR
Courts should consider proportionality of evicting a vulnerable tenant (high threshold for private owners)
McDonald v McDonald
• S21 Housing Act 1988 cannot allow proportionality-> go through s4 HRA
- S6 HRA (public authorities)
- S8 ECHR (respect for fam)
[Exclusive possession][Grant to occupy}
Legal exclusive possession [Licensee] VS Legal right of exclusive possession [Tenant]
(Social policy cases for charities)
Watts v Stewart
• Almshouse can kick out tenants if inconsistent with its purpose
• Gray v Taylor- denial of security of tenure is a proportionate means for legitimate aim
Property owners should be careful not to grant exclusive possession in theory AND practice
Camelot Guardian Management v Greg Roynon
Formalities required for a lease?
— REGISTRATION —
• S27(1) Land Registration Act 2002
• Land Registration Rules 2003
• Creates a legal right
— IN WRITING —
• S2(1), (3) LPMPA 1989: In writing, signed by parties
• S53(1) LPA 1925
• Alone, it creates equitable right
— DEED —
• S52(1) LPA 1925: All conveyances void unless made by deed
• S1(2), (3) LPMPA 1989: Must be expressly a deed “on its face” and signed by drafter in the presence of witness, delivered by drafter
— PAROL —
• S54(1) LPA 1925: Alone, it creates an equitable right
• S54(2) LPA 1925: BUT creates legal right for leases equal or under 3 years at best rent
• With a deed, makes a legal right
4 Unities for Joint Occupancy?
- Possession
- Interest
- Time
- Title
[Term Certain] Uncertain terms are considered void (‘till the end of war’)
Lace v Chantler
[Term Certain] Uncertain terms now until life (90 Years)
LPA s149(6)
Mexfield v Berrisford