Co-Ownership * (bc my brain combusted on the other one) Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What are the traits of a JOINT TENANCY?

A
  • Can be in law and/or equity
  • 1 whole share belonging to max 4 trustees
  • Right of survivorship of remaining trustees
  • Needs 4 unities
  • If in law, cannot be severed: S36(2) LPA 1925
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are the traits of a TENANCY IN COMMON?

A
  • In equity
  • Shares, while undivided and possibly unequal, can be split amongst trustees
  • No right of survivorship, shares pass on as per normal
  • Just need unity of exclusive possession
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

How can a TIC arise?

A
  1. From the start
    • Conveyance/Will expressly naming co-owners as TIC
    • Only exclusive possession unity present
    • Co-owned property used in a commercial context
    • Unequal contributions to purchase of property
    • Joint mortgage (multiple lenders)
  2. Severance from JT in equity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Consideration(s) for transfer of property under a sole trustee for unregistered title?

A
  1. Doctrine of notice
    • Purchaser must be made aware of Ben’s interest in property to bind interest to purchaser, otherwise Ben’s interest overreached: Hunt v Luck

• If no inspection made by lender/purchaser, then will be served with constructive notice (bad): Lloyds Bank v Carrick

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Consideration(s) for transfer of property under a sole trustee for registered title?

A
  1. ‘Actual occupation’ overriding interest
    • Williams and Glyn’s Bank v Boland
    • Sch 3 para 2 LRA 2002
    • Is Ben’s occupation obvious on a reasonably careful inspection/was Ben asked and Ben unreasonably failed to reveal his interest?
  2. Restriction to protect minor interest (no actual occupation)
    • Elias v Mitchell
    • S40 LRA 2002: Purchase price must be paid to 2 trustees
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Transfer of property under 2 or more trustees?

S2(2) LPA 1925: Need at least 2 trustees or a trust corporation

A
  1. ‘Actual occupation’ can be overreached
    • City of London Building Society v Flegg
    • S27 LPA 1925
  2. Rights of Ben transferred to purchase price
    • Purchase price = Trust fund, where Bens have equitable interest
  3. Purchaser cannot be a trustee of land
    - HSBC v Dyche
    • Read overreaching requirements + purchaser definition tgt
    • Purchaser may not be acting ‘in good faith’ and in breach of trust, so no overreaching
  • Bagum v Hafiz
    • Court can, however, order trustee to sell to particular beneficiary
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Powers of trustees?

A
  1. All powers of absolute owner: S6(1) TOLATA 1996
    •Cannot transfer interests between Bens, only court can order that: Bagum v Hafiz and Hai
  2. Can exclude/restrict Bens’ entitlement to occupation: S13 TOLATA 1996
    • Can excl any (NOT ALL) Bens
    • Can order excl Ben to pay any expenses
    • Can order other Bens to pay excl Ben compensation (not beyond Ben’s share value
  3. Under a duty to consult Bens: S11(1) TOLATA 1996
    • But purchaser doesn’t have to check if this has been done
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Rights of beneficiaries?

A
1. Right of occupation: S12 TOLATA 1996
• S12(2): No right to occupy if property is 'unavailable or unsuitable' for occupation
• Chan v Leung: Look at 
(a) SIZE/CHARACTER OF PROP; 
(b) TRAITS OF OCCUPIER; 
(c) INTENTIONS OF OTHER PARTIES
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

In dispute between TRUSTEES AND BENS, what can court order?

A
  1. Sale refusal (possibly w order regulating right to occupy)
  2. Sale order (possibly w suspension for a period)
    • If land was bought for a purpose that can still be fulfilled, sale order unlikely: Re Buchanan- Wollaston; Re Evers’ Trust
  3. Partition of prop
    • Rodway v Landy
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

How to sever a JT in equity?

E.g. if trustees in dispute

A

• Severance: S36(2) LPA 1925

Williams v Hensman
1. Act on your share (Explicit enforceable int)

  1. Mutual Agreement [Burgess v Rawnsley: Make clear other party want common shares, not joint; Pennycuick: Doesn’t have to be an enforceable agreement]
  2. Course of dealing sufficient to intimate interest of all were mutually treated as constituting a tenancy in common
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

“notice has to express desire to bring about wanted result immediately”

  • Severing JT in EQ
A

Harris v Goddard
• Divorce petition insufficient to sever
• No desire expressed to bring about result immediately

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Effect of severance?

A

Goodman v Gallant

• Equal shares even if ≠ contributions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

How much mortgage to be paid if one co-owner forged signature to take a mortgage?
(Dispute between co-owner and 3rd party)

A
  1. Mortgage Corporation v Shaire
    • Amount to be repaid to be recalculated based on his equitable interest in the property
  2. Bank of Ireland v Bell
    • If inequity greater on creditor (e.g. unpaid debt more than house value vs 17yo’s occupation), will order sale
  3. Etridge No 2
    • If charge obtained through ‘undue influence’, then transaction doesn’t stand
    • Overt acts of improper coercion OR undue influence in a r/s
  4. Order of sale dependent on S15 TOLATA 1996
    • Intention of trust creator
    • Welfare of minors in occupation
    • Interests of secured creditors
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What if 3rd party claims against one co-owner’s beneficial interests?

A

First National Bank v Achampong
• JT can be severed
• 3rd party can apply for sale order

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly