Learning Theory III: Operant Conditioning Flashcards
describe operant conditioning
- behavior is a function of its consequences–it is increased or decreased as a result of the consequences that follow it
- Law of Effect: behavior followed by a pleasant consequence is strenghtened (reinforced) and tends to be repeated; that followed by an unpleasant consequence is weakened (punished) and less likely to be repeated
- in contrast to classical conditioning, operant involves primarily voluntary behaviors
describe positive reinforcement
- a pleasurable stimulus is applied following a behavior
- the behavior is strengthened as a result
- contingency: the reinforcing stimulus is said to be contingent upon performance of the behavior
according to the behaviorist position, too little positive reinforcement in life results in ______
according to the behaviorist position, too little positive reinforcement in life results in depression
- this leads to a downward spiral of increasing levels of depression
according to a cognitive therapist position, the primary source to depression would be _____
according to a cognitive therapist position, the primary source to depression would be negative thinking
ini the case of patients suffering from _____, physician attention may inadvertently reinforce unnecessary clinic visits
ini the case of patients suffering from somatic symptom disorders, physician attention may inadvertently reinforce unnecessary clinic visits
describe the factors that affect the effectiveness of reinforcement
- immediacy: the reinforcer is most effective when presented immediately after the behavior
- consistency: reinforcing every instance of the behavior results in the behavior being learned most quickly
- contingencies should be made clear
describe the schedules of reinforcement
-
continuous reinforcement: every instance of the behavior is reinforced
- result: quicker learning but the behavior extinguishes more quickly
-
intermittent reinforcement: not every instance of the behavior is reinforced
- result: behavior not learned as quickly but is more resistant to extinction
- intermittent reinforcement delivered on a variable ratio schedule is most resistant to extinction (a slot machine that pays off on average every 10 times)
child B, since intermittent reinforcement is harder to extinguish
contrast primary vs secondary reinforcers
-
primary reinforcer: naturally reinforcing
- food, water, sex, some drugs, nurturance
-
secondary reinforcer: acquire their reinforcing ability through learning
- applause, an “A” grade, a gold medal, money
describe nuances with food as a reinforcer
-
satiation: primary reinforcers are subject to satiation
- the subject gets enough of the reward and its no longer effective
- better to use secondary reinforcers
-
food as reinforcement: feeding is often recommended to soothe a complaining infant; it tends to work, even when hunger isn’t the problem
- recent research suggests an association between use of food as a reinforcer and being overweight at 1 year
- behavioral patterns are established early–the contingency of food improving emotion and depression may prove problematic later in life
desccribe negative reinforcement
- an aversive stimulus is removed, terminated, or avoided following the behavior
- the behavior is strengthened as a result, and more likely to be repeated
- example: the behavior of seeking medical attention often results in alleviation of discomfort, pain or anxiety
- this behavior is thus negatively reinforcement and is more likely to be repeated
- exams removed, curfew removed, no homework, exemption from chores
clicker #2
negatively reinforced
summarize positive vs negative reinforcement
describe avoidance behavior
- behaviors that allow the person to avoid an anxiety provoking stimulus or situation are referred to as avoidance behaviors
- such behaviors are negatively reinforced–they are more likely to be repealed because they allow the person to avoid the unpleasant anxiety associated with the stimulus
- avoidance behaviors are seen in phobias, OCD, PTSD angr agoraphobia
describe operant conditioning and drug dependence
- the reinforcement theory of drug dependence involves both positive and negative reinforcement
- positive reinforcement: some psycho-active drugs are powerful reinforcers and strengthen drug-taking and drug-seeking behaviors
- negative reinforcement: in a physically dependent subject, the drug also terminates unpleasant withdrawal effects, thereby strengthening drug taking/seeking behavior (and the needle habit)
describe the effect of stimulus control
- whether a previously reinforced behavior is actually performed often depends on the presence of certain stimuli in the environment
- if such stimuli have in the past been associated with reinforcement of the behavior, they are referred to as antecedent or discriminative stimuli (SDs)
- the presence of such stimuli make performance of the behavior more likely because they predict reinforcement
- so, behavior is the result of both its consequences and antecedent environmental stimuli
explain the example of eating and stimulus control
describe positive vs negative punishments
-
positive punishment: application of an aversive stimulus contingent upon performance of the behavior
- examples: spanking, yelling, shocking
-
negative punishment: removal of a pleasant or desirable stimulus contingent upon the behavior
- examples: removing privileges, removing points, withdrawing attention
describe factors affecting effectiveness of punishment
- punishment is most effective when it is presented consistently, immediately following a behavior and with the contingencies made clear
describe primary vs secondary punishers
- primary punishers are naturally punishing (shock, pain, nausea)
- secondary punishers are also learned (ridicule, banishment from one’s group, an F grade)
describe operant extinction
- occurs when reinforcement is consistently withheld following a previously reinforced behavior
-
post-extinction burst: a rapid burst of the behavior may be observed at the beginning of extinction trials, followed by extinction
- kid that is screaming is ignored, so they scream louder and louder
contrast operant extinction vs punishment
- both extinction and punishment weaken behavior
- in the case of operant extinction, when a previously reinforced behavior is emitted, nothing happens (ignoring screaming child) (reinforcement used to happen)
- however, in the case of punishment, a behavior is emitted and something happens (the behavior is followed by a consequence)
negatively reinforced
weight loss has been both positively reinforced (compliments) and negatively reinforced (removal of teasing)