Learning - Number Flashcards
What abilities are involved in numerical competence?
Relative numerosity discrimination (lots and few)
Absolute number discrimination
Ability to count
Ability to do arithmetic
What is relative numerosity discrimination
Ability to discriminate between sets of items on the basis of the relative number of items that they contain.
Emmerton, Lohmann, Niemann (1997) - Relative numerosity discriminations in pigeons
Trained pigeons to discriminate between few (1-2) and many (6-7)
Reversed colours to ensure pigeons weren’t just judging based on light
Responded approporiately (transfer of concept) to new numbers (3,4,5)
What is the concept of absolute number
Number not intrinsically related to what you’re counting - 4 apples and 4 cars have something in common
Koehler - Jakob and absolute number
Jakob the raven coud choose pot with 5 spots from an array even when size of spots varied 50-fold
Size of dots varied to rule out other explanations
Matsuzawa (1985) - Ai and absolute number
Ai the chimp had to select six response keys (labelled 1-6) when shown arrays of red pencils with 1-6 pencils per array
Over 90% accuracy
No necessarily same as counting
What is the perceptual matching problem?
Animals could be learning about specific perceptual patterns - learning patterns not numbers
Why did Matsuzawa argue that Ai did not use perceptul matching?
Ai could transfer ability to other types of objects - not just pencils
What other factors is number often confounded with?
Time - for items presented serially
Space - for items presented simultaneously
How did Pepperberg (1994) attempt to overcome the problem of perceptual matching?
Used the same array but varied the colours
Asked how many of certain colour
What is subitising?
o The perception at a glance of the number of items present, without counting them successively; the maximum number of items that can be counted in this way is five
What is the relationship between RT and counting?
If counting, RT should increase with increasing number
How is it argued that subitising differs to counting?
The original claim was that subitizing is different from counting because there is little increase in reaction time per item for low numbers of items
When dealing with numbers bigger than six, you have to count each one, and because it takes a finite amount of time to count each item the RT increases with number of items
What is implied about counting low numbers?
Do not need to count displays of five items or less - number is immediately perceived
What evidence is there against subitising?
There is a RT effect of display size with displays of less than five items - takens longer to perceive oneness than twoness
Suggests we are counting even with small displays