Learning Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Purpose of learning

A

Need a representation of the world it can’t be innate, we have to build that representation by learning what goes with what associations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Salient stimuli

A

Lead to better learning CS examples: bright light vs. dim light, loud noises vs. quiet noises. US examples: high valued food vs low value food. Describes how meaningful and attention giving a stimulus is e.g., loud horn is played then you are given a thousand dollars you will learn to associate the sound with the reward faster than if someone sniffed and then you received a chocolate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Surprising outcomes

A

The US gets less surprising each time we come to expect the US, the CS and the US become associated

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Importance of surpise

A

A mis match between our knowledge and what we observe tells us what we need to learn

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Model of learning

A

Learning is a product of salience and surprise

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What happens to surprise across training?

A

Surprise decreases, and as it decreases so does the rate of learning

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Learning explained graph format

A

Learning is the change in expectation across the trail. The line straightens as out learning stops as we have no more surprises

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What happens the more salient the CS is

A

The more salient a CS is the faster we learn about it the asymptote (a value that you get closer and closer to, but never quite reach) is the same

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

The US determines the asymptote:

A

the larger the US the higher our expectation, takes the same number of trials to reach asymptote

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Omission of the US:

A

Extinction if the US is more than expected, expectation increases. If the US is omitted, we get less than we expect. This means out expectation decreases.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

More than one CS:

A

if we want to test whether a tablet makes us feel good, we would usually test in isolation but there are many other things that can change how we feel such as: sleep and diet. Need to adjust model to predict the effects

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Three examples of CS interactions:

A

overshadowing
blocking
protection from extinction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

overshadowing

A

In a doubles match of tennis for example learn less about each player than we would if they were playing alone.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Mackintosh (1976) overshadowing

A

Conditioned rats a light and a shock measured “fear”
Less fear when the light conditioned in compound with a noise. The effect was smaller when the noise was quieter. It’s as if the noise and light competed to be learned about

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

When does learning stop for overshadowing?

A

When the summoned expectation reaches asymptote, the amount of learning about each CS depends on their relative salience

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Blocking:

A

The noise reached asymptote before the light is added, because there is no surprise on the trials with light there is no learning.

17
Q

The Rescorla-Wagner model: (1972)

A

One of the most influential models in psychology, making a lot of predictions many of which have subsequently been observed. Based on classical conditioning, asserts that amount of associative change (ΔV) or fear that is learned to a CS on a given fear conditioning trial is determined by the salience of the CS

18
Q

Exposure therapy for phobias:

A

Presenting a CS without consequence, (extinction) only in cases where a phobia is the result of conditioning.

19
Q

Problems with exposure therapy

A

Therapist becomes a safety signal so the phobia returns once the therapist is no longer there, so need to do therapy in the most realistic environment as possible.

20
Q

Extinction depends on context?

A

Id the feared CS is presented without the safety signal the phobia returns, prediction states that exposure therapy will be most effective when the context is varied