League of Nations Flashcards
Manchuria
- Japan needs Manchuria for its natural resources after GD
- They invade Manchuria, China asks LON for help and they do nothing
- European powers wanted to maintain trade routes between far east and them, showing that the LON was biased and ineffective
- European countries were more concerned about their own political instability and threats like Nazi Germany
- Manchuria was geographically distant from major European powers
- Lytton Commission took several months to make a report on Manchuria
- Japan withdrew from the League after moral sanctions
Abyssinia
- France and Britain want to maintain good relations with Italy
- Very mild/ineffective sanctions (no oil sanctions, only prohibiting arms sales which harms Abyssinia more than Italy)
- Ineffective sanctions because Italy is maintaining control and supervision over Germany and Austria, already having prevented an Anschluss
- League’s lack of fast decision making is shown (They take nearly a year for sanctions to be made)
Successful? in 1930s
YES when dispute was between two small countries (ADD EXAMPLES)
NO when dispute included a major power
- Saar commission returns Saarland to Germany, great success for Hitler and shows effectiveness of LON
- After the GD, major powers like Japan, Germany, and Italy were leaving the league after going against restrictions
- USSR expelled after Finland invasion in 1939
- German invasion of Poland in 1939 collapses the league
Great Depression
- Reduces effect of economic sanctions since members didn’t want to enforce them due to their need for resources
- Extremist parties gain power
- Countries focused on self-determination, going against the ideas of the LON (collective security)
- Countries don’t want to share military so military sanctions are ineffective if not useless
German membership
- At first, not allowed to join
Britain and France did not trust them as members
They would need to prove that they are not a threat
War Guilt Clause also served as a demotivating factor for them being members - Joined in September 1926 because of the Locarno Pact
Locarno Pact - An agreement made between Germany, Britain, France, Belgium, and Italy mutually guaranteed peace in Western Europe
USSR membership
They did not join the LON initially
This was because they had just gone through a revolution so they were rebuilding the country
(Same as US) They didn’t want to be involved in European disputes
Eventually joined but were kicked out due to their invasion of Finland in 1939
USA membership
Didn’t join LON at all even though it was WW’s idea
- Wanted to keep out of European affairs after heavy spending and casualties in WW1
- Potentially would set back they economy
- General public in US strongly disagreed with WW and didn’t want to be members
Members
Original (Jan 1920)
- 42 countries including
- Italy, France, Japan, Britain (The Big 4)
NOT original members
- Germany (Joined Sept 1926)
- USSR (Joined Sept 1934)
- USA
- Austria (Joined Dec 1920)
Aims
- Prevent future war
- Global disarmament
- Improve global healthcare and wellbeing
- Provide financial advice/aid for countries in need and increase cooperation between countries financially
Aim: Improve living conditions
SUCCESS
- Health Organisation helped with technical assistance and advice on public healthcare internationally
- Helped Soviet Russia prevent a typhus epidemic
- Helped develop and distribute vaccines for tetanus and other diseases
- Widely reguarded as the most successful organisation of the league
FAIL
- Low importance to public heathcare since it didn’t classify as the “global state of emergency” needed for a league meeting
Aim: International cooperation economically
SUCCESS
- Fixed difficult financial situation on Austria and other smaller countries by controlling interest rates and the circulation of bank notes, as well as providing advice
FAIL
- GD made countries focus on self-determination, with less inclination to cooperate internationally and more centered on sustaining their country on their own
Aim: Disarmament
SUCCESS
- Naval limitations on Britain, France, Japan, and USA in 1920
FAIL
- Only defeated powers were forced to disarm following the terms of their respective peace treaties
- No major global disarmament efforts were made
Aim: Discouraging aggression from any nation
SUCCESS
- Moral - Economic - Military sanctions
- Collective security internationally (though made ineffective due to GD)
FAIL
- No LON army
- Absence of USA’s power
Assembly
- Authority to admit new members (two thirds vote)
- Approving LON’s budget/financial decisions
- All members could discuss recurring issues
- Propose ammendments/changes to the covenant of the LON
Collective security
Not likely to work bc:
- Significant nations were not members of the League like USA or USSR, meaning that threats exist outside of the League
- Required unanimity when making decisions which meant that making decisions was difficult and long
- Self-interest: nations often preferred their own interests over international security
- LON had no standing army
Successful in 1920?
SUCCESSES:
DISPUTE
- 1921 Solved dispute between Sweden and Finland over the Aaland Islands (given to Finland)
- 1921 Solved dispute between Germany and Poland over Upper Silesia
HEALTH
- Helped USSR prevent typhus epidemic
- Developed vaccines for tetanus and other diseases
FAILS:
- USSR/USA not members (harmed collective security)
- Due to unanimous decision taking, votes took a long time to pass
- Failed to take decisive action when Italy invaded Corfu in 1923
Weaknesses of assembly/council
ASSEMBLY:
- Unanimity rule meant decisions were difficult to pass
- Slow because of large amount of members
- Decisions didn’t have major consecuences if not followed
- Infrequent meetings (once a year)
COUNCIL:
- Also required unanimity
- Was dominated by B/F, Italy, Japan which often acted on self interest
- Very few non-permanent state members
- No military force
Permanent court of justice
- Hear and decide upon country’s disputes
- Provide legal advice to the Council of the League
- Promote stability and consistency on international relations
- Provide binding judgements on parties involved