LEADERSHIP Flashcards

1
Q

Leadership

A

Definition: The process of influencing, motivating, and enabling others to work collaboratively towards shared goals. It involves setting a clear direction, building a team, and fostering an environment where individuals feel empowered to contribute..

Key Characteristics:

Visionary
Decisive
Empathetic
Communicative
Adaptable

Why it’s Important: Strong leadership helps teams, organizations, and even societies function effectively and progress.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Importance of Leadership

A

Provides Direction and Vision:
Leaders define a clear path forward, setting goals, creating strategies, and aligning teams towards a common purpose.

Motivates and Inspires:
Effective leaders energize their teams, instilling a sense of enthusiasm and commitment towards shared objectives.
Cultivates a Positive Work Environment:
Leaders foster a culture of collaboration, respect, trust, and open communication, creating space for people to thrive.
Drives Innovation:
Leaders encourage new ideas, challenge the status quo, and support calculated risk-taking, leading to progress and improvement.
Manages Change:

Leaders navigate through transitions and uncertainty smoothly, helping teams adapt and embrace change for continued success.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Autocratic (Authoritarian) Leadership

A

A leadership style characterized by strict control and decision-making authority residing solely with the leader. Leaders provide clear instructions and expect them to be followed precisely.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Key Characteristics of Authoritarian leadership

A

Centralized decision-making
One-way communication (top-down)
Emphasis on obedience and following rules
Limited input from team members

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Situations where Authoritarian leadership might be effective:

A

Crisis situations requiring quick decisions
Tasks with clear steps and procedures
Teams with limited experience or expertise

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Potential downsides of Autocratic leadership

A

Stifles creativity and innovation
Can lead to low morale and disengagement
Hinders development of team members’ skills
Creates a single point of failure (leader burnout)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Democratic Leadership Style

A

Encourages team participation in decision-making
Values input and ideas from all members
Fosters collaboration and teamwork
Leaders act as facilitators and guides

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Keywords for Democratic Leadership

A

Consensus-driven
Inclusive
Empowering
Team-oriented

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Benefits of Democratic Leadership

A

Increased employee engagement
Improved problem-solving
Higher morale and job satisfaction
More creative solutions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Challenges of Democratic Leadership

A

Can be slow decision-making
Requires strong facilitation skills from leader
May not be suitable for all situations (e.g., crisis)
Relies on effective communication

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Laissez-Faire Leadership Style

A
  • A hands-off leadership approach
  • Leaders delegate tasks and decision-making to team members.
  • Minimal leader involvement in day-to-day work
  • Emphasis on individual autonomy and responsibility
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Key Characteristics of Laissez-Faire Leaders

A
  • High trust in team members’ abilities
  • Belief in self-direction and motivation
  • Minimal supervision or guidance
  • Focus on providing resources and support
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Advantages of Laissez-Faire Leadership

A
  • Promotes creativity and innovation
  • Encourages self-reliance and problem-solving
  • Can be effective with highly skilled, experienced teams
  • Low-stress environment for employees
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Disadvantages of Laissez-Faire Leadership

A
  • Lack of direction can lead to confusion
  • Can stifle growth with less experienced teams
  • Requires highly motivated individuals to thrive
  • Accountability can become unclear
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Transactional Leadership Style

A

Focuses on exchange of effort & rewards
Clear expectations & goals for performance
Motivates with rewards & punishments (carrots & sticks)
Emphasizes efficiency & achieving objectives

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Key Components of Transactional Leadership

A

Contingent rewards: Providing rewards (bonuses, promotions) for achieving goals.
Management by exception (active): Closely monitoring for deviations from standards & correcting them.
Management by exception (passive): Intervening only when problems arise.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Strengths of Transactional Leadership

A

Effective in achieving clear, short-term goals
Maintains order & stability
Clear structure & expectations for employees
Efficient task completion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Limitations of Transactional Leadership

A

Limited focus on employee growth & development
Doesn’t foster creativity or innovation
Can lead to a fear-based work environment
May not be suitable for complex or changing situations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Transactional Leadership vs. Emotions

A

Transactional Leadership: Focuses on task completion & exchange (rewards & punishments). Less emphasis on emotions.
Emotional Intelligence: Leaders understand & manage their own emotions, and those of others. Can be applied in any leadership style.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Transactional Leadership & Negative Emotions

A

Transactional leadership’s focus on achieving results can lead to stress or fear in employees if not balanced with emotional intelligence.
Ex: Micromanagement or harsh criticism can demotivate employees.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Transactional Leadership with Emotional Intelligence

A

Transactional leaders who use emotional intelligence can be effective motivators.
Ex: Providing specific praise & recognition alongside rewards strengthens positive emotions & reinforces desired behaviors.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

The Power of Emotional Intelligence in Leadership

A

Emotional intelligence can enhance any leadership style, including transactional leadership.
Leaders who understand emotions can build stronger relationships, improve communication & create a more positive work environment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Transactional Leadership & Lower-Level Needs

A

Transactional leadership often addresses lower-level needs in Maslow’s hierarchy.
Ex: Providing a salary (physiological), job security (safety), and performance-based bonuses (esteem) can motivate employees to achieve goals.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Limitations of Transactional Leadership for Higher Needs

A

Transactional leadership may not fully address higher-level needs in Maslow’s hierarchy (belonging, self-actualization).
Ex: Focus solely on rewards and punishments may not inspire creativity, innovation, or a sense of purpose

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Combining Transactional Leadership with Other Styles

A

Transactional leadership can be effective when combined with other styles that address higher-level needs.
Ex: A transactional leader who also uses a transformational style can provide rewards while inspiring a shared vision and growth opportunities.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

Transactional vs. Autocratic Leadership

A

Similarities:
Both emphasize clear expectations and achieving goals.
Leaders provide direction and structure.
Differences:
Decision-Making: Transactional leaders allow some input, while autocratic leaders make decisions alone.
Motivation: Transactional leaders use rewards & punishments, while autocratic leaders rely on authority.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

Transformational Leadership

A

Focuses on inspiring & motivating followers to exceed expectations.
Creates a shared vision for the future.
Encourages innovation, creativity, and problem-solving.
Develops followers into leaders themselves.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

The Four Key Behaviors of Transformational Leaders

A

Idealized Influence: Leads by example with strong morals & ethics, serving as a role model that inspires followers to trust and admire them. Transformational leaders consistently demonstrate the values they expect from others, building trust and creating a positive and ethical work environment. Their high standards motivate followers to hold themselves to a higher standard as well.

Inspirational Motivation: Articulates a compelling vision that excites followers, outlining the positive impact their work can have and the bright future that awaits if they achieve a shared goal. This vision should be clear, concise, and achievable yet challenging, stretching followers to reach their full potential. Transformational leaders can effectively communicate this vision in a way that resonates with followers, igniting their passion and commitment to achieving the goal.

Intellectual Stimulation: Challenges the status quo & encourages new ideas. Transformational leaders are not afraid to ask tough questions and challenge existing assumptions. They create an environment where creativity and innovation are valued, and where followers feel empowered to share their ideas and perspectives. This can lead to new and improved ways of working, and ultimately, greater success for the organization.

Individualized Consideration: Treats followers as individuals with unique needs & growth potential. Transformational leaders take the time to get to know their followers as individuals, understanding their strengths, weaknesses, and aspirations. They provide individualized support and development opportunities to help each follower grow and reach their full potential. This personalized approach fosters trust, loyalty, and a strong sense of commitment among followers.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

Benefits of Transformational Leadership

A

Increased employee engagement & morale
Higher productivity & innovation
Stronger team spirit & collaboration
Development of future leaders

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

Challenges of Transformational Leadership

A

Can be difficult to sustain, requiring high energy & charisma from the leader.
May not be suitable for all situations (e.g., strict deadlines).
Relies on a trusting relationship between leader & followers.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

Connections Between Transactional leadership and Big five model

A

May be more effective with leaders high in Conscientiousness (organized, efficient) who value clear expectations and goal achievement.

May struggle to motivate followers high in Openness to Experience who crave novelty and challenge.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

Connections Between Transformational leadership and Big five model

A

Often associated with leaders high in Extraversion (outgoing, energetic) who can easily communicate a vision and inspire others.
Leaders high in Openness to Experience themselves may be more likely to encourage creativity and innovation in their teams.
Transformational leaders likely need a good balance of Agreeableness (cooperative) to build trust and Conscientiousness (organized) to achieve the vision.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

Servant Leadership

A

A leadership philosophy where the leader’s primary goal is to serve others.
Focus on the growth and well-being of employees and the community.
Leaders share power and prioritize the needs of others.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
34
Q

Key Characteristics of Servant Leaders

A

Empathy: Ability to understand and share the feelings of others.
Healing: Supporting the personal and professional growth of employees.
Awareness: Understanding oneself and the impact on others.
Persuasion: Using gentle influence rather than relying on authority.
Foresight: Anticipating the future and its likely outcomes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
35
Q

Advantages of Servant Leadership

A

Increased employee engagement and commitment
Improved trust and loyalty between leader and team
Fosters a sense of community and purpose
Encourages personal and professional growth of employees

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
36
Q

Potential Challenges of Servant Leadership

A

Can be misconstrued as weakness or lack of authority
Requires strong self-awareness from the leader
May not be suitable for fast-paced or crisis situations
Needs buy-in from the whole organization to thrive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
37
Q

Bureaucratic Leadership

A

A leadership style emphasizing strict adherence to rules, regulations, and a clear hierarchy of authority.
Leaders focus on maintaining order, consistency, and efficiency.
Decisions are made based on established procedures.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
38
Q

Key Traits of Bureaucratic Leadership

A

Formal Structure: Clearly defined roles, responsibilities, and lines of authority.

Impersonal: Emphasis on the position, not the person. Decisions made objectively.

Rule-Based: Strict adherence to established procedures and regulations.

Focus on Efficiency: Prioritizes consistent outcomes and process optimization.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
39
Q

Advantages of Bureaucratic Leadership

A

Predictability & Stability: Clear rules provide consistency and fairness.
Efficiency: Standardized processes can be effective for routine tasks.
Reduces Bias: Focus on rules reduces potential for favoritism.
Well-suited for highly regulated industries: Where compliance is essential.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
40
Q

Disadvantages of Bureaucratic Leadership

A

Rigidity: Slow to adapt to change, can stifle innovation and creativity.
Demotivation: Focus on rules may hinder employee autonomy and initiative.
Impersonal: Can create a cold, uncaring work environment.
Limited Employee Growth: Emphasis on following rules may not foster development.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
41
Q

Paternalistic Leadership

A

A leadership style where the leader acts like a parent figure, guiding and protecting employees in exchange for loyalty and obedience.
Decisions are made centrally by the leader, who acts in what they believe to be the best interests of their followers.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
42
Q

Key Characteristics of Paternalistic Leaders

A

Authoritarian: Maintain strong control over decision making.
Protective: Focus on the well-being of employees, sometimes making decisions on their behalf.
Benevolent: Act with kindness and good intentions.
Expect Loyalty: Demand obedience and trust from their followers.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
43
Q

Advantages of Paternalistic Leadership

A

Provides support & stability Especially beneficial in organizations with young or inexperienced employees.
Can create a sense of family: Fosters strong bonds between leader and followers.
Can be efficient: Decision-making can be fast since the leader holds primary authority.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
44
Q

Disadvantages of Paternalistic Leadership

A

Limits innovation & autonomy: Employees have little input, stifling creativity.
Creates dependency: Followers may not develop decision-making skills.
Potential for abuse: Leaders with bad intentions can exploit the power imbalance.
Unsuitable for modern workplaces: Doesn’t align with contemporary values of employee empowerment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
45
Q

What is collaborative leadership?

A

A leadership style emphasizing shared power, decision-making, and knowledge across organizational boundaries and hierarchies.

Leaders act as facilitators, building trust and empowering teams to work towards common goals.

Focuses on harnessing diversity of expertise and perspectives.

46
Q

Key Characteristics of Collaborative Leadership

A

Shared Purpose & Vision: A clear, compelling vision that motivates the team.
Open Communication: Encourages information sharing, transparency, and respectful dialogue.
Mutual Trust & Respect: Builds an environment where team members feel valued and psychologically safe.
Empowerment & Accountability: Leaders distribute power and enable teams to take ownership, while also holding them accountable for results.
Conflict Resolution: Proactive in addressing conflict and finding solutions that work for the team.

47
Q

Benefits of Collaborative Leadership

A

Increased innovation: Diverse perspectives lead to creative solutions.
Improved problem-solving: Collective intelligence tackles complex issues.
Enhanced Engagement: Empowered employees are more motivated and committed.
Greater adaptability: Teams can quickly respond to changes in the environment.
Stronger organizational culture: Shared values and sense of belonging are fostered.

48
Q

Challenges of Collaborative Leadership

A

Time-consuming: Reaching consensus can take longer than traditional top-down decisions.
Requires strong facilitation skills: Leaders need to manage diverse opinions and guide the process.
Potential for conflict: Differing viewpoints can increase friction if not managed constructively.
Requires organizational support: A collaborative culture is needed for this style to thrive.

49
Q

When is Collaborative Leadership most effective?

A

Complex challenges requiring diverse expertise.

Environments demanding innovation and adaptability.

Organizations with a skilled and motivated workforce.

Teams with a willingness to compromise and collaborate.

50
Q

What is narcissistic leadership?

A

A leadership style characterized by:
Grandiose sense of self-importance
Extreme need for admiration
Lack of empathy for others
Sense of entitlement and exploitative behaviors for personal gain

51
Q

Key Characteristics of Narcissistic Leaders

A

Charismatic and visionary: Can be initially persuasive and inspiring.
Arrogant and domineering: Seek to control and put down others.
Exploitative: Use team members to achieve their own goals.
Overly sensitive to criticism: React angrily to any dissent or perceived threats.
Lack accountability: Unwilling to admit mistakes or take responsibility.

52
Q

The Short-Term Appeal of Narcissistic Leaders

A

Confidence and Boldness: Can appear decisive, projecting an aura of success.
Charisma: May charm followers initially, especially in times of crisis.
Visionary: Can present compelling, if unrealistic, plans for the future.

53
Q

The Destructive Consequences of Narcissistic Leadership

A

Toxic Work Environments: Bullying, manipulation, and creating a culture of fear.
Poor decision-making: Prioritize self-interest over the organization’s well-being.
Ethical failures: May engage in unethical or risky behaviors to maintain control.
Damaged morale and trust: Lead to high turnover and loss of talent.
Lack of sustainability: Success tends to be short-lived as they undermine their own support base.

54
Q

What are Trait Theories of Leadership?

A

One of the earliest approaches to leadership, proposing that leaders are born with innate characteristics that distinguish them from others.
Focuses on identifying specific personality traits, intelligence, or physical attributes that contribute to leadership success.

55
Q

Common Traits Explored in Trait Theories

A

Intelligence: Ability to think strategically and solve problems.
Extroversion: Sociability, assertiveness, and confidence.
Determination: Persistence, goal-oriented, and ability to overcome obstacles.
Integrity: Honesty, trustworthiness, and ethical principles.
Self-Confidence: Belief in one’s abilities.

56
Q

Key Criticisms of Trait Theories

A

Oversimplification: Leadership is complex, and there’s no single set of “perfect” traits.
Ignores context: Situational factors and a leader’s followers play a huge role in the effectiveness of leadership.
Can lead to bias: Focus on inborn traits may overlook developing the potential in individuals who don’t fit the “ideal” profile.

57
Q

Modern Relevance of Trait Theories

A

While not a comprehensive approach, traits still matter: Certain traits can increase a leader’s potential for effectiveness.
Basis for leadership development: Identifying valuable traits provides a framework for training and self-improvement.
Understanding our own traits: Helps individuals identify their leadership strengths and weaknesses.

58
Q

What is the Great Man Theory of Leadership?

A

An early leadership theory popularized in the 19th century by historian Thomas Carlyle.
Proposes that great leaders are born, not made.
Emphasizes innate, often masculine, qualities like charisma, intelligence, decisiveness, and heroism.

59
Q

Key Assumptions of the Great Man Theory

A

Leaders are extraordinary individuals destined for greatness.
Leadership emerges during times of crisis or significant historical events.
Followers are passive and drawn to the leader’s exceptional qualities.

60
Q

Historical Context of the Great Man Theory

A

The theory reflects the social and political climate of its time:
Rise of strong individualistic figures in politics and military.
Emphasis on social hierarchy and traditional gender roles.
A limited understanding of how leadership is shaped and developed.

61
Q

Major Criticisms of the Great Man Theory

A

Overly Simplistic: Ignores the role of followers, situations, and the complexities of leadership development.
Gender Bias: Excludes women and minorities, perpetuating the idea that leadership is inherently masculine.
Lack of Empirical Support: Research doesn’t support the idea that leaders are born with a fixed set of traits.
Undemocratic: Promotes the idea of a single, unaccountable leader, rather than collective or shared leadership.

62
Q

Legacy of the Great Man Theory

A

Largely discredited as a comprehensive leadership theory.
Shaped popular language and stereotypes about leaders (e.g., the “natural-born leader”).
Serves as a reminder of the importance of questioning assumptions about who can lead and how leadership develops.

63
Q

Who was Gordon Allport?

A

A prominent American psychologist (1897-1967)
A pioneer in the study of personality, known for his trait-based approach emphasizing the uniqueness of individuals.
Rejected the dominance of psychodynamic theories and their focus on unconscious motivations.

64
Q

What are Traits according to Allport?

A

Traits are relatively enduring patterns of thought, feeling, and behavior that distinguish one person from another.
They are not fixed, but can show some consistency across time and situations.
Traits influence how we perceive and interact with the world.

65
Q

Allport’s Trait Hierarchy

A

Allport classified traits into three primary categories:

Cardinal Traits: Rare, dominant, and pervasive in a person’s life. They largely shape an individual’s behavior and reputation (e.g., Mother Theresa’s selfless compassion).
Central Traits: Common, core characteristics that form the foundation of personality (e.g., kindness, competitiveness, loyalty).
Secondary Traits: More specific and situational dispositions that may vary depending on context (e.g., food preferences, disliking crowds).

66
Q

Key Ideas of Allport’s Trait Theory

A

Emphasis on conscious motives: Focused on how people understand and organize their own lives.
Individual Differences: Rejected the idea of universal personality stages, stressing unique trait patterns within each person.
Influence of Situation: Acknowledged that traits interact with situational factors shaping behavior, but believed traits have some consistency.

67
Q

Contributions of Allport’s Theory

A

Foundation for trait-based personality research: Inspired later theories like the Big Five model of personality.
Lexical Approach: Advocated for studying the ways in which personality traits are naturally encoded within language.
Influence on Personality Assessment: Contributed to the development of personality inventories to measure traits.

68
Q

What is Action-Centered Leadership?

A

A leadership model emphasizing three overlapping areas of responsibility:
Task: Achieving the goal
Team: Building and maintaining group cohesion
Individual: Meeting the needs of team members
Leaders must balance these areas for effective results

69
Q

The Action-Centered Leadership Model (Visual)

A

Three circles overlapping in a Venn diagram:
TASK labeled circle
TEAM labeled circle
INDIVIDUAL labeled circle
Where circles overlap indicate the interaction between these areas

70
Q

Key Task Needs of Action-Centered Leadership Model

A

Defining objectives: Clear goals and direction
Planning: Strategies and resource allocation
Problem-solving: Overcoming obstacles
Decision-making: Making choices effectively
Reviewing progress: Monitoring and adapting plans as needed

71
Q

Key Team Needs of Action-Centered Leadership Model

A

Cohesion and morale: A sense of shared purpose, belonging
Communication: Open, clear, and supportive interactions
Effective teamwork: Cooperation and collaboration
Maintaining standards: Quality, discipline, accountability
Conflict resolution: Addressing disagreements constructively

72
Q

Key Individual Needs of Action-Centered Leadership Model

A

Motivation: Inspiration and recognition of contributions
Development: Opportunities for growth and learning
Support: Guidance, resources, addressing personal concerns
Respect and Trust: Valuing individuals as whole people
Fairness: Equitable treatment, consideration of each member

73
Q

Why is it called “Action-Centered”?

A

The model prioritizes getting things done through action.
Leaders aren’t defined solely by traits or behaviors, but by their ability to achieve desired outcomes.

74
Q

Key Strengths of Action-Centered Leadership

A

Simple and practical: Easy to understand and apply
Balanced approach: Recognizes the importance of task, team, and individual simultaneously
Flexible: Applicable to various leadership situations
Emphasizes action: Promotes a results-oriented mindset

75
Q

What is the Behavioral Approach to Leadership?

A

A major shift away from trait theories focused on inborn leadership qualities.

Posits that effective leadership is primarily based on observable behaviors that can be learned and developed.

Emphasizes the study of “leadership styles” – distinct patterns of behavior leaders exhibit.

76
Q

University of Michigan Studies

A

Focus: Identifying the behaviors of effective leaders.
Key Finding: Leaders exhibit two main types of behavior:
Production-Oriented: Emphasis on task completion and technical work aspects.
Employee-Oriented: Focus on relationships, support, and employee well-being.
Conclusion: Leaders who demonstrate strong employee orientation tend to have more productive and satisfied teams.

77
Q

Ohio State University Studies

A

Focus: Similar to Michigan, aimed to define core leader behaviors.
Key Finding: Leaders’ behavior can be categorized along two dimensions:
Initiating Structure: Defining tasks, setting goals, and organizing work.
Consideration: Showing concern for followers, building trust and rapport.
Conclusion: Ideally, leaders should exhibit a high degree of both initiating structure and consideration.

78
Q

Similarities between Michigan and Ohio Studies

A

Both emphasized the behavioural approach: They focused on what leaders DO rather than innate traits.

They identified two core aspects of leader behaviour: Task-focused and people-focused behaviours, albeit with slightly different labels.

Their models contributed to the development of more complex leadership theories.

79
Q

Differences between Michigan and Ohio Studies

A

Emphasis: Michigan leaned towards finding the “better” type (employee-oriented), while Ohio focused on high levels of BOTH being ideal.

Terminology: Used slightly different terms for the dimensions they identified.

Research Methods: Approaches to measuring leader behavior differed between the two studies.

80
Q

Overall Contributions of the Michigan and Ohio State University studies on management,

A

Demystified leadership: Showed it’s not just about personality, but about learnable behaviors.

Shifted focus towards leader-follower relationships: Highlighted the importance of a people-centered approach.

Paved the way for: Situational and contingency theories that emphasized adapting leadership style based on the context.

81
Q

What is the Blake and Mouton Managerial Grid?

A

A model that maps leadership styles based on two dimensions:

Concern for Results (Production): Emphasis on efficiency, goals, productivity.

Concern for People: Focus on relationships, team well-being, and morale.

The grid creates a matrix with various leadership styles plotted based on the leader’s balance of these two concerns.

82
Q

Key Leadership Styles on the Grid

A

Impoverished Management (1,1): Low concern for people and results. Minimal effort and involvement.
Authority-Compliance (9,1): High concern for results, low concern for people. Focus on tasks, control, and strict rules.
Country Club Management (1,9): High concern for people, low concern for results. Focus on comfort, friendly atmosphere.
Middle-of-the-Road Management (5,5): Moderate concern for both results and people. Seeks to balance and maintain status quo.
Team Management (9,9): High concern for both results and people. Ideal style fostering commitment, collaboration, high performance.

83
Q

How the Grid is Used

A

Self-Assessment: Leaders assess their natural leadership tendencies.
Goal Setting: Identify areas for growth or shift in style if needed.
Situational Leadership: Understand that different situations might call for different leadership approaches.
Team Development: Helps the team understand their leader’s style and adapt accordingly.

84
Q

Strengths of the Managerial Grid

A

Simple and Visual: Easy to understand the concept and the various styles.
Practical: Offers a framework for leaders to reflect and develop their skills.
Emphasizes Balance: Highlights the importance of both people-focus and task-focus.

85
Q

Limitations of the Managerial Grid

A

Oversimplification: Leadership is complex and the two-dimensional model might not capture all nuances.
No Single Best Style: The “Team Management” ideal isn’t always optimal. Effective leadership depends on the situation and followers’ needs.
Limited Evidence: Some research challenges the idea that a 9,9 style consistently leads to the best outcomes.

86
Q

What is the Three-Dimensional Grid Theory? Reddin 3D Leadership Model.

A

Developed by William Reddin as an extension of the Blake and Mouton Managerial Grid.
Adds a third dimension – “Effectiveness” – recognizing that a leader’s style needs to fit the specific situation to be successful.
Proposes four basic styles, each of which can be effective or ineffective depending on the context.

87
Q

The Three Dimensions of the Grid

A

Task Orientation: Focus on goal achievement, efficiency, and organization.
Relationship Orientation: Emphasis on building trust, team support, and positive workplace climate.
Effectiveness: The degree to which the leader’s style achieves the desired outcomes in relation to the situation

88
Q

Reddin’s Four Basic Leadership Styles

A

Separated: Low task, low relationship. Disengaged leader.

Related: High relationship, low task. Focus on social harmony.

Dedicated: High task, low relationship. Prioritizes results.

Integrated: High task, high relationship. Ideal style, adaptable to the situation.

89
Q

Key Concept of 3D Grid Theory: Situational Effectiveness

A

Reddin emphasizes there’s no single “best” leadership style.
Each of the four basic styles can be effective or ineffective depending on:
The task requirements
Characteristics of the team
The broader organizational context

90
Q

Strengths of the 3D Grid Theory

A

Explicit Focus on Situational Leadership: Recognizes that leadership isn’t one-size-fits-all.
Diagnostic tool: Helps leaders evaluate their style’s suitability for different situations.
Flexibility: Encourages leaders to become more versatile and adapt based on context.

91
Q

Limitations of the 3D Grid Theory

A

Complexity: Three dimensions can make it more difficult to learn than simpler models.
Overly Prescriptive: May be tempting to view the four styles as the ONLY options.
Limited Research: Less empirical support compared to other leadership theories.

92
Q

What is the Tannenbaum and Schmidt Leadership Continuum?

A

An influential model demonstrating the range of leadership styles based on the degree of authority used by the leader vs. the freedom granted to the team.
It emphasizes that effective leadership lies on a spectrum, not as a binary choice between fully controlling or fully delegating decision-making.

93
Q

Tannenbaum and Schmidt Leadership Continuum visual

A
94
Q

Factors Influencing Leader’s Choice on the Continuum:

A

Leader factors: Personality, values, confidence in the team.
Team factors: Their competence, experience, and cohesion.
Situational factors: Time pressure, complexity of the decision, organizational culture.

95
Q

Key Contribution of the Model

A

Nuance and Flexibility: Shifts the focus from “either/or” leadership thinking to choosing the appropriate style along a spectrum.
Situational Emphasis: Leaders need to adapt their decision-making approach based on the context.
Empowerment: Recognizes the value of team involvement and autonomy when appropriate.

96
Q

Who was Rensis Likert?

A

An influential social scientist and organizational psychologist who conducted extensive research on leadership and management styles.
Founded the Institute for Social Research at the University of Michigan.
Known for developing participative leadership models and the concept of linking pins in organizations.

97
Q

What is Likert’s Leadership Theory?

A

Focuses on the impact of different leadership styles on organizational performance and employee satisfaction.
Argues that participatory and employee-centered leadership styles are more effective than authoritarian styles.
Proposes Four Systems of Management to categorize leadership styles along a continuum.

98
Q

Likert’s Four Systems of Management

A

System 1: Exploitative Authoritative

Top-down control, fear, and threats. Little trust and minimal communication.
System 2: Benevolent Authoritative

Less harsh than System 1, yet still top-down. Limited communication and some rewards may be used.
System 3: Consultative

Leaders seek input before making decisions, but ultimate control remains with them. Some trust and communication.
System 4: Participative

Decision-making involves the whole team, high trust, and robust communication. Leaders act as facilitators.

99
Q

Key Ideas of Likert’s Theory

A

Participative Styles are Superior: Likert believed System 4 organizations would consistently outperform others over time.
Link with Productivity and Satisfaction: Participative leadership is associated with higher morale, motivation, and productivity.
Not one-size-fits-all: In time-sensitive or crisis situations, a more directive approach may be necessary.

100
Q

Contributions of Likert’s Theory

A

Importance of Employee Involvement: Pioneered the idea of participation as key to effective management.
Evidence-based: Likert’s research offered empirical data, not just theoretical arguments.
Foundation for later work: Influenced other models emphasizing team empowerment and collaboration.

101
Q

What are the Huneryager and Heckman Four Styles of Management?

A

A leadership model focusing on how leaders use power and influence within teams.
It proposes four primary styles based on whether the leader makes independent decisions or involves the team to varying degrees.

102
Q

Four Leadership Styles of Huneryager and Heckman

A

Dictatorial:
Complete centralization of decision-making by the manager.
Manager makes decisions and enforces upon subordinates, who obey without question.
Work gets done through fear, by threats of penalties or punishment..

Autocratic:
Manager sells or bosses subordinate to accept decisions.
Authority and decision-making are centred on the leader.
This can achieve results, but they depend heavily on the leader’s abilities. …

Democratic:
Manager will ask for opinions from subordinates.
Authority and decision-making are decentralized.
This offers more promise than other types.
Requires leaders of better quality

Laissez Faire:
Complete decentralization of decision making by the manager. …
Requires mature subordinates and is the least predictable or consistent in its results.

103
Q

Situational Factors of Huneryager and Heckman

A

The model suggests that the most appropriate style depends on:
The leader’s personality and experience
The subordinate’s maturity and abilities
The complexity of the task
Pressure and time constraints

104
Q

Strengths of the Huneryager and Heckman Model

A

Simple and easy to understand: Clear distinctions between the styles.
Highlights situational leadership: Recognizes the need to adapt style based on context.
Focus on Power: Raises awareness of how leaders use their power and its impact on teams.

105
Q

Limitations of the Huneryager and Heckman Model

A

Limited Styles: Only considers four basic styles, potentially oversimplifying leadership behavior.
Negative Emphasis: Frames two of the styles (dictatorial, autocratic) with very negative connotations.
Limited Empirical support: Not as extensively researched as other leadership theories.

106
Q

Who was Kurt Lewin?

A

A pioneering social psychologist considered one of the founders of modern social, organizational, and applied psychology.
His work significantly influenced leadership research, group dynamics, and organizational change.

107
Q

Lewin’s Leadership Styles

A

Identified three primary leadership styles:
Autocratic (Authoritarian): Leader makes decisions with little to no team input.
Democratic: Leader fosters participation, guides decision-making, and promotes collaboration.
Laissez-Faire: Leader delegates, providing minimal direction and taking a hands-off approach.

108
Q

Key Research Findings of Lewin’s Leadership theory

A

Lewin’s studies suggested:
Democratic leadership often led to greater team satisfaction, motivation, and creativity.
Autocratic leadership could be efficient in some cases but led to lower morale and less initiative.
Laissez-faire leadership often resulted in low productivity and lack of clear direction.

109
Q

Situational Influence as per Lewin’s Leadership theory

A

Lewin emphasized context: The most effective leadership style depends on:
Leader’s personality and skills
Team members’ capabilities and maturity
The nature of the tasks and organizational environment

110
Q
A