Lay People (Lay Magistrates and Juries) Flashcards
List 4 advantages of juries :
*ensures public confidence
*Jury equity
*secrecy of jury room
*impartiality
Explain this advantage of juries : ensures public confidence
Juries are regarded as one of the fundamental indicators of a democratic system.
Helps show the public that it is not just the state charging, convicting and sentencing.
Explain this advantage of juries : jury equity
A jury can disagree with their own law and apply their own idea of fairness, as they do not need to give reasons for their decision.
Juries almost always reach a verdict and convict roughly 2/3 of the time.
EXAMPLE : Ponting’s Case 1984
What happened in Ponting’s Case 1984?
A civil servant leaked information, despite signing Official Secrets Act , jury refused to convict him even though the judge ruled he had no defense.
Explain this advantage of juries : Secrecy of the jury room
The jury is free from pressure during its discussion and can ignore the strict letter of law. Section 8 Contempt of Court Act 1981 makes it a criminal offence to disclose jury deliberations.
EXAMPLE : Bushnell’s Case 1670
What happened in Bushnell’s Case 1670?
A jury refused to convict Quaker activists, they were still fined and imprisoned but were released after an appeal.
Explain this advantage of juries : Impartiality
Juries are not connected with anyone involved in the case. The random selection should result in a cross-section of society, who will cancel each others prejudices out.
Explain this disadvantage of juries : Secrecy
The jury does not need to give reason for their decision which makes it difficult for defendant to appeal, as there is no way of knowing how the decision was reached and whether the case was understood.
EXAMPLE : Mirza 2004
What happened in Mirza 2004?
One juror complained that the other jury members showed racial bias while coming to their decision.
Explain this disadvantage of juries : media influence
In high profile cases juries may find it difficult to be independent and free from influence due to high publicity.
EXAMPLE : Taylor sister’s 1993
What happened in the Taylor’s sisters case 1993?
Two sisters were charged with murder, a newspaper published photos that gave a false impression of what happened. The judge gave leave to appeal because of the possible influence the pictures could have had on the jurys verdict
Explain this disadvantage of juries : Lack of understanding
Jury members lack legal qualifications, no minimum educational standards are required.
A small number of jurors have admitted to having difficulty understanding cases, which is worrying considering a persons liberty is at stake.
Explain this disadvantage of juries : jury tampering
Sometimes jury members may be bribed or threatened, so the prosecution can apply for trial without a jury.
EXAMPLE : Twomey 2009
What happened in Twomey 2009?
There was a serious attempt at interfering with the jury and Section 44 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 applied and a retrial was ordered by judge alone.
What qualifications must you have to be a lay magistrate?
-judicial qualities or characteristics
-aged between 18-74
-must not have a serious criminal conviction
-must not have a conflict of interest (e.g. police officer,traffic warden etc.)
-must not have a condition which will interfere with their duties