Involuntary Manslaughter - Unlawful Act Manslaughter 2 Flashcards
What is involuntary manslaughter?
an unlawful killing without the intention to kill or cause GBH
What kind of offence is involuntary manslaughter?
a common law offence
What are the two ways of committing involuntary manslaughter?
unlawful act manslaughter and gross negligence manslaughter
What is unlawful act manslaughter?
Where D causes death through doing an unlawful and dangerous act, that they have the mens rea for
What is gross negligence manslaughter?
Where D causes death by breaching a duty of care towards V in a grossly negligent way.
What are the 4 key elements to unlawful act manslaughter?
1.D must do an unlawful act
2.The act must be objectively dangerous
3.The act must have caused the death
4.D must have the mens rea for the unlawful act
must be an unlawful act
What happened in the case of Lamb 1967?
D and his friend were fooling around with a revolver when one of them was killed, however an unlawful act did not exist as they did not understand the risk of such a gun. V was not in fear of being shot.
What is a key case to show there must be an unlawful act for the offence of unlawful act manslaughter?
Lamb 1967
What is a key case for criminal damage as the unlawful act in unlawful act manslaughter?
Newbury and Jones 1976
What is a key case for burglary as the unlawful act in unlawful act manslaughter?
Watson 1989
What is the second key element for the offence of unlawful act manslaughter?
The act must be objectively dangerous
What does it mean in the second key element of unlawful act manslaughter : The act must be objectively dangerous?
All sober and reasonable people would recognise that the unlawful act has a risk of some harm
What is a key case to show that an unlawful act must be dangerous?
Church 1965
True or False
D can cause emotional harm, which then leads to death, and be charged with involuntary unlawful act manslaughter?
FALSE - there must be some risk of physical harm. (even if it is not aimed at V)
What is a key case for arson as the unlawful act in unlawful act manslaughter?
Goodfellow 1986
What happened in the case of Goodfellow 1986?
D set fire to his council house, with the idea of getting a new one from the council. Instead his wife, son, and his son’s girlfriend were killed - D was convicted of unlawful act manslaughter, it did not matter that the arson was not intended towards anyone.
What happened in the case of JM & SM 2012?
After a fight at a nightclub, V died from a ruptured artery, a rare injury to occur - D was charged with unlawful act manslaughter because a sober and reasonable person can foresee that D’s conduct could lead to some kind of harm.
What happened in the case of Watson 1989?
V died from a heart attack 90 minutes after being burgled. The burglar smashed a window to break in and hurled abuse at V when he saw him. The burglary became physically dangerous once the old mans frailty became apparent to the burglar, as a reasonable and sober person can foresee that an old, fragile person may face harm in a situation like this.
What happened in the case of Newbury and Jones 1976?
youths had thrown paving slabs from a bridge onto a passing train, smashing a window and killing a guard. This shows that D only has to make the mens rea for the unlawful act, it is not necessary to prove that D foresee harm.
Factual and Legal causation must be proved for an unlawful act manslaughter offence, explain these both .
Factual - But for test (But for D’s action would V have died?)
Legal - was it a significant contribution, or was the chain of causation broken
What is a key case for unlawful act manslaughter that shows that D cannot be charged if the chain of causation is broken?
Kennedy 2007 - where D prepared an injection of heroin for V to inject himself, V then self-injected and died - V’s voluntary act of injecting himself broke the chain of causation between D supplying and V’s death.
What happened in the case of Kennedy 2007
D prepared an injection of heroin for V, V then self-injected and died. - V’s voluntary act broke the chain of causation between D supplying and V’s death.
True or false
D requires the mens rea for unlawful killing to be charged with unlawful act manslaughter
False - they just need the mens rea for the initial unlawful act