Law and Society test 2 Flashcards

1
Q

Exclusionary Rule

A

Law that prohibits use of ILLEGALLY OBTAINED evidence
- “fruit of the poisoned tree”= if interrogation, confession or evidence is obtained illegally, it cannot be used in court case/ trial

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Probable Cause

A

Officer must have set of facts, information, circumstances, or conditions that would lead a reasonable person to believe an offense was committed and that the accused committed the offense
-Has to show why you believe informant/ information is credible

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Warrantless Searches

A

Emergency Situations= danger to the public or in hot pursuit, police do not have to wait for judge to sign off/ allow a warrant

Hot Pursuit= police can continue to follow/ search without a warrant, if person is fleeing from non-violent matters then police have to have a search warrant

Stop and Frisk= police stop and pat down person to see if any weapons are on them, have to have REASONABLE SUSPICION, plain sight and plain touch, police can take things out of your pockets and charge you with a crime

Search incident to arrest= when police are searching they can search you and your immediate area (lunge distance/area) (ex: bags, but police cannot go through your phone without a warrant)

Car Searches= police can search cars without a warrant if they have probable cause to pull you over (traffic violations)

Check Points= police checking for DUI or insurance, treating every car exactly the same, DO NOT have to have probable cause (public safety issue), has to prove car is mobile/ moving

Consent given= can search without a warrant if consent is given by homeowner/ roommates

Plain View= gun on table and blinds are open, police can come in and collect that evidence

Open fields=police can collect evidence if found on property outside your property (CURTLIAGE= land and buildings immediately surrounding a dwelling, anything outside of fence)

Plain touch= same as stop and frisk

Electric surveillance= if police fly over and see evidence in backyard, they do not have to have a warrant to obtain it bc it is in “plain sight”

Abandoned property= throw away something in garbage, police can obtain it without a warrant (if on the street not next to your house)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Speech in Schools

A
  • speech in schools can be restricted
  • Tinker case (1969): Ruled that the armbands that were being used to protest were protected speech because
    the school couldn’t prove that it was disruptive. The standard set by this becomes the main test for issues in the future
  • Bethel v. Fraser (1986): crude speech that is disruptive in school is not protected by the First Amendment
  • Hazelwood v. Kohlmer (1988): schools have the right to censor a school-sponsored newspaper
  • Morse v. Fredrick (2007): schools have the right to ban things that condone or promote drug paraphernalia
  • 3 main things to consider: off-campus speech is the responsibility of the parent; anything off-campus is fine,
    even if it’s about the school, and school needs to protect “unpopular” opinions of students
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Religious Clauses and Courts Approach

A

No one can discriminate or fire anyone based on religious grounds (failing drug tests due to religious events, fire someone for not being able to work on church days, or refuse medical/ life sustaining treatment based on religion (gov is 3rd parent for every child), pull kids out of school for religious reasons is constitutional with evidence)

  • Government can regulate “new religions” (Reynolds v. US (1879))
  • religion can be anything, regardless of how crazy, just must be “sincere belief”
  • Can’t use religion to get out of stuff (e.g., against my religion to do homework)
  • “least restrictive means” – Brunfield v. Brown (1961)
  • moves away from the secular test to least restrictive, from 1980-1990, Court chips away at Sherbert Test
  • Congress passed the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, meant to restore Sherbert
  • Boerne v. Flores (1997) challenges RFRA, Congress wants the Smith Standard, rules RFRA is unconstitutional
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Prayer in schools

A

students have right to choose to participate in school prayer, school cannot force it or punish for not reciting prayer, or have one specific priest from a religion to say prayer at school
-Supreme Court has not ruled on Pledge of Allegiance

-has been ruled that school-sponsored prayer is a violation of First Amendment rights
- Wallce v. Jaffree (1984): SCOTUS ruled that Alabama’s prayer and meditation statute was unconstitutional, as it
failed that secular purpose test and found that the statute’s purpose was to establish religion in public schools,
which violated the Establishment Clause

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Parents, Children and religion

A

Government is 3rd parent to every child, parents cannot refuse life sustaining medical treatment on religious grounds or force children to work underaged based on religious grounds

  • Courts have ruled that protecting children is more important than protecting religious freedoms. E.g., children
    cannot be made to sell religious literature due to child labor laws
  • Wisconsin v. Yoder (1972): Court ruled that the government can’t force school attendance if it’s against
    religious beliefs, but there must be evidence of true and honest belief
  • Bob Jones University v. US (1983): the university had a rule against interracial dating, they were sued, saying
    they shouldn’t have a tax-exempt status due to a racist policy. SCOTUS ruled against the school, citing that there
    was a “compelling interest” in eradicating racism in education
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Libel

A

written word defaming a person’s reputation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Police Discretion

A

-Decide when to act and when not to
-seriousness of the crime
-attitude of wrongdoer
-relationship between parties (family or not)
-Departmental policies (mandatory arrest policies, domestic violence and car chases)
-officer’s supervisor and peers
-situational (if there is record of the occurrence or not)

Race:
-police are trustworthy
-experience and training
-knowledgeable about criminal behavior
-potential danger (leeway in decision making prevents danger)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Types of Police Agencies

A

State Police= non city areas, same as local officers, has crime labs and training academies , highway patrol and traffic enforcement

County Police (sheriff’s office)= duties do not vary much from local police, running jails and court security, serving summons

Local Police=in charge of everything local unless it is a federal or state crime, traffic enforcement, narcotics, vice control

Police Role (local and sheriffs office)= enforce laws, provide services, prevent crimes, preserve peace, protect civil liberties and rights, handling minor distrubences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Search Warrant Requirements

A

Particularity= search warrant must be particular in what they want and what they want to look for, who it is and where they expect to find the evidence

Probable Cause= officer must have set of facts, information, circumstances, or conditions that would lead a reasonable person to believe an offense was committed and that the accused committed the offense

Sources of Probable Cause=
1.personal observation=circling around the same building, can be pulled over
2. Information=if you talked to the victim or witnesses can establish probable cause
3. Evidence=physical evidence, blood DNA)
4. Association= associating with known criminals can sometimes not be enough to warrant probable cause for a search warrant

Reasonableness= search has to be related to its goals, gets stopped at the border, cannot search glove box because no person would fit in a glove box, can only search backseat and trunk

Knock and Announce= police must knock and announce their presence before entering with a search warrant, must wait 15-20 seconds with no response to enter, time of day changes time length they must wait before entering, evidence found after search with no response can be used in court

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Types of Constitutional Interpretations

A

Original Intent= “originalist”, what the writers of the Constitution meant to them at that time

Literalism= “plain-meaning”, literally what does the law say (words), not worried about intent

Broad and Open= justices get to decide what the law means and if there are any “implied rights”, takes into account how society has changed, what the law means to people now

-Framers wanted the Constitution to be a living document (continue on), open for interpretation and changed as years go on

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Prior Restraint

A

-cannot stop speech or words from being spoken or published, must wait until after to take action against it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Types of Incorporations

A

-14th amendment makes it clear that everyone has equal protection under the law

Total Incorporation= Every single right the federal government guarantees, the states have to as well

Selective Incorporation= Supreme Court will pick 1 right or law at a time for us to have, ability of the federal government to prevent states from enacting law that violate Constitutional rights of citizens

Total Plus= Every single right plus additional rights given to us by the states

Selective Plus= WHAT U.S. HAS NOW, supreme court hears cases to see what rights the 14th amendment gives us throughout the states

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Types of Civil Law

A

Torts= personal injury attorney (personal property) (morris bart)

Property= ownership and acquisition and acquisition of property

Contracts= legally binding agreement

Family= child custody, inheritance and adoption

Juvenile= children committing crimes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Sherbert Test

A

Sherbert v Verner 1963
-used in court to determine if a person’s religious freedoms have been violated by the government

17
Q

LAPS Test

A

Miller v California 1973
-determines whether pornography is obscene, looks if it has Literacy, artistic, political, or scientific purpose/ value (if it does it is NOT obscene)

18
Q

O’Brian Test

A

US v O’Brian 1968
-said burning draft card is still ILLEGAL, and cannot use the 1st amendment (freedom of speech) to defend the burning of the draft card

19
Q

Miller v California 1973

A

-Miller was mass mailing advertisements for his porn films and books
-Court looks at piece as a whole book or film to see if the material has an literary, artistic, political, or scientific value (USED LAPS TEST)
-Obscene materials are not protected by the Constitution
-Court said having porn in our homes is not illegal, but having child porn is

20
Q

Katz v. US

A

-Illegal sports gambler on the phone with bookie in a photo booth, was arrested after police were eves-dropping on the phone call
-Supreme Court sided with Katz on the grounds that a phone booth is meant for PRIVATE phone calls and Katz right to privacy was violated (4th amendment)

21
Q

Miranda v Arizona 1966

A

-suspect arrested and confessed to a crime and a number of others
-claimed he was not aware of his rights, did not know he did not have to talk to the police/ remain silent or refuse questioning or request a lawyer
-Supreme Court said police must read every suspect their rights when arrested and before questioning them
-Miranda Rights

22
Q

Mapp v Ohio 1961

A

-Cleveland cops get a tip that Mapp is harboring a fugitive in his house, they knock on his door and Mapp said they cannot enter without a search warrant
-Cops come back with more police but no search warrant, Mapp gives them the same response
-Cops come back with a fake search warrant and search the house
-Mapp went to Supreme Court under a violation of his 4th amendment rights, proved the search warrant was fake so all the evidence was obtained illegally
-Supreme Court sided with Mapp (search warrant must be specific and signed by a judge)

23
Q

Chaplinsky v New Hampshire 1942

A

-argument between 2 people drew a crowd, both people were arrested and said they were going to fight the police officer
-Supreme Court said certain types of speech are not protected by the 1st amendment, if the words do not hold social value they are not protected
-fighting words do not have social value (unprotected)

24
Q

Employment of Oregon v Smith 1990

A

-2 native americans were fired for using drugs in their religious ceremonies but they worked at a Rehab Center job
-could not file for unemployment because they were fired for religious reasons
-Court sided with Oregon and said drugs were a neutral law of general applicability
-Majority opinion= can only use religion to get around a law by using free exercise clause and an addition of another right like freedom of speech (1st amendment)
-SMITH STANDARD

25
Q

Lemon v Kurtzman 1971

A

-government paying teacher to teach math (non-religious subject) at a private school
-used Lemon Test
1. Material must have a secular purpose (non-religious purpose)
2. Cannot advance or inhibit religion
3. No excessive entanglement between church and state

26
Q

Cantwell v Connecticut 1940

A

-First time supreme court said states have to use free exercise of religion
-Incorporates free exercise of religion
-Connecticut requires a license to solicit for religion or charities
-JWs charged with breaking peace because they had no license
-Says state can’t determine that the state can’t determine if their business was religious or not
-Unanimous decision, states can’t prohibit unless harming the public
-Valid Secular Test
-Lower courts should use this test
-Restrict religious practice if:
1.The law serves a non-religious purpose
2.it cannot target a specific religion

27
Q

Texas v Johnson 1989

A
  • Desecration of an American flag is protected under the First Amendment
  • falls under expressive conduct and political in nature
28
Q

Cohen v. California (1971)

A
  • A man was charged with disrupting the peace for wearing a jacket that said “fuck the draft! Stop the War!”
  • Court ruled that this was a violation of the First Amendment’s right to freedom of expression, and that this
    message was not directed toward anyone, and, despite the message being expletive, there was no evidence that
    it would provoke someone into action.
  • This protected two elements of speech, emotive and cognitive.
29
Q

Snyder v. Phelps (2011)

A
  • Snyder filed a lawsuit against Phelps, who, along with Westboro Baptist Church, picketed at his funeral. They
    sued for defamation, invasion of privacy, and emotional distress
  • Question: does the First Amendment protect protestors at a funeral from liability for intentionally inflicting
    emotional distress?
  • Court ruled that this speech is protected
30
Q

2nd Amendment cases

A
  • US v. Miller (1939)
  • Court allowed a special taxation on guns; involved sawed-off shotguns, Court ruled that there was no
    use in military combat, therefore not as much protection
  • early view, now outdated
  • D.C. v. Heller (2008)
  • DC had banned handguns, but citizens could own a rifle if they unloaded it and locked it while stored
  • Court ruled that gun ownership is not related with the military, and can be used for legal individual
    purpose, which is protected by the 2nd Amendment
  • Court overturned DC’s handgun ban and struck down the need for rifles to be unloaded and
    disassembled
  • McDonald v. Chicago (2012)
  • similar fact pattern to Heller
  • States must recognize the 2nd Amendment