Last Class Drugs Flashcards
Drug addiction poses serious problems
▪ Alcohol
- car accidents, fetal alcohol syndrome, Korsakoff’s syndrome, heart disease, intracerebral hemorrhage
▪ Smoking
- Lung cancer, heart attack, stroke, less healthy babies, babies with smaller brains.
▪ Cocaine
- psychotic behaviour, brain damage, death by overdose, competition for lucrative and illegal markets, causes violent deaths.
➔ Addictive drugs stimulate brain mechanisms of reinforcement responsible for positive reinforcement. We do it cuz drugs are like chocolate.
Addiction: What is it?
Drug addiction involves:
- repeated consumption of drug (natural or synthetic)
- an overpowering desire or need (compulsion) to
continue taking the drug and obtain it by any means
- a tendency to increase the dose
- detrimental effects on the individual and society
Drug addicts are habitual drug users who continue to take a drug despite its adverse effects on their health and social life.
Positive Reinforcement
▪ Positive reinforcement increases the frequency of behaviour because it is regularly followed by an appetitive stimulus.
- e.g. a food (the appetitive stimulus) will positively reinforce a lever press (the behaviour)
▪ Addictive drugs have positively reinforcing effects.
If the drug is inhaled or taken i.v., the response or act of taking the drug will be positively reinforced.
▪ Positive reinforcement is immediate and powerful
Positive Reinforcement and Drug Abuse
▪ Drug effectiveness is greatest when the reinforcing stimulus occurs immediately after the response.
▪ Rats will enter a maze arm where the small amount of food is delivered straight away rather than enter an arm where he has to wait to get a large food reward ➔ small immediate rewards are preferred over large delayed rewards (Logan, 1965)
▪ Most addictive drugs have immediate effects.
Heroine, faster than morphine
▪ A drug addict seeks a sudden “rush” produced by the fast
acting drug.
▪ The immediate, reinforcing effects of an addictive drug can for some individuals overpower the recognition of the long-term aversive effects.
Negative Reinforcement
▪ Negative reinforcement increases the frequency of behaviour because of the removal of an aversive stimulus.
- e.g. a rat will press a lever (the behaviour) to prevent the occurrence of a foot shock (the aversive stimulus).
▪ Negative reinforcement is NOT the same as punishment.
- negative reinforcement increases frequency of behaviour e.g. “if I take another shot, my withdrawal symptoms will disappear.”
- punishment makes the behaviour less likely to occur. e.g. “Everytime I smoke cannabis, I vomit.”
Temporal discounting
Longer delay, higher chance change preference.
Seen in variety of behaviours , like gambling or procrastination
Effects of Physical Dependence
People who are physically dependent on drugs show:
- tolerance: a decreased sensitivity to the drug due to continued use.
- withdrawal symptoms: opposite effects of the drug itself when the person stops taking the drug. Kicking the habit in rehab, show restless kicking behaviour, literally. Cold turkey, cold sweats!
Positive reinforcement provokes drug taking in the first place but negative reinforcement ensures that withdrawal effects go away.
Dependent vs addiction
Depednatcny is like insulin shots! Medical.
Not addicted.
But the addicts to drugs, cannot survive without it,
Psych issue.
Show tolerance and withdrawal.
Fine line I think.
Craving and Relapse
▪ Why do addicts crave drugs and why does the craving occur after long periods of abstinence?
- When an addictive drug activates the mesolimbic dopaminergic system, it gives incentive salience to the stimuli that are present at the time of drug taking.
- e.g. drug paraphernalia (bong, pipe, syringe, spoon, mirror, razor blade).
- Stimuli with incentive salience elicit craving or “wanting” (Robinson and Berridge, 2003).
Shift from action, (as becomes automatic) to visual cues/stimuli. Cog to I guess
incentive salience
When an addictive drug activates the mesolimbic dopaminergic system, it gives incentive salience to the stimuli that are present at the time of drug taking.
self-administration
Animals quickly learn to press a lever to get an injection of drug (self-administration), and develop a physical dependence to it.
▪ They will show withdrawal symptoms when the drug is removed
Hedonic value is not associatied with
Likeing, it causes acquisition of drug addiction
incentive salience is important to liking! After.
Reinstatement Model of Drug Seeking
▪ Animals first trained to self-administer a drug in the presence of a light.
▪ The lever press response is extinguished by replacing the drug with saline.
▪ The animal eventually stops making lever responses.
▪ A “free” injection of drug is administered OR a stimulus with
incentive salience is presented (e.g. a light).
▪ The rat starts to lever press again.
▪ The reinstatement (relapse) of a previously extinguished response provides a model for the craving that motivates drug-seeking behaviour in former addicts.
Mesolimbic System
If dopamine transmission is blocked in the nucleus accumbens, a “free” shot of drug will
▪ NOT reinstate lever press responses (Grimm and See, 2000).
Addictive drugs (e.g. PCP, cannabis, amphetamine, cocaine, etc) trigger the release of dopamine in the nucleus accumbens (White, 1996).
The sight of smoking related images produces greater activation in the nucleus accumbens in smokers (David et al., 2005).
Prefrontal Cortex role in drug abuse,
Note card gambling study Iowa gambling task.
- Cocaine reinstates cocaine-seeking behaviour in rats by stimulating neurons in the prefrontal cortex that activate neurons in the nucleus accumbens via a glutamatergic pathway.
- Activation of the prefrontal cortex is directly related to craving.
- People with ventral and medial prefrontal lesions perform poorly on gambling tasks because they are attracted by the large payoffs. This is dominated by the immediate gratifcation of the large win (or the “high” produced by the drug).
- Prefrontal cortex of cocaine abusers is less active than that of subjects during abstinence (Volkov et al., 1992).