Last cases Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What is the common law definition of murder?

A

One person kills another with the intention to cause death or serious injury

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

In what case did D throw V into a river?

A

CHURCH 1966

  • V mocked D’s ability to satisfy her sexually
  • D knocked V unconscious during a fight
  • D feared V dead so threw her into a river
  • Autopsy found that she had died through drowning
  • Convicted of manslaughter - judge made errors in direction but appeal still found him guilty
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What test for constructive manslaughter is derived from CHURCH?

A

Edmund Davies LJ:

  • Unlawful act causing death cannot render manslaughter verdict inevitable
  • Needs an OBJECTIVE assessment of whether D’s actions might cause harm
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

In what case did a 3 year die from a fall downstairs?

A

MACKIE 1973

  • D threatened step son with severe lashing
  • Boy tried to run away but fell downstairs and dislocated neck and died.
  • D charged with manslaughter - upheld by CofA
  • Although accepted that D could punish child, the threat made was seen as excessive
  • Objectively, a reasonable person could have foreseen the danger of the threat
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

In what case was a 3-month old baby thrown?

A

WOOLLIN 1999

  • 3-month baby thrown onto floor and fractured skull and died
  • Convicted of murder - upheld by CofA
  • HoL reduced to manslaughter. Direction provided to jury had widened the MR and so made conviction unsafe.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

In light of WOOLLIN what guidence should the judge make to the jury?

A

In cases of murder, where simple direction is not enough, they are not entitled to infer necessary intention

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

In what case was sexual infidelity permitted for Loss of Control

A

CLINTON 2012

  • Both D and V (married) suffered depression and on medication
  • Trial separation, wife left. D left with children
  • V started affair - informed D
  • D invited V to family home while children away.
  • In HEAVILY INTOXICATED STATE D killed V with wooden baton and then strangling with belt.
  • Judge did not allow loss of self control due to sexual infidelity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

How did CLINTON appeal?

A

Claimed:

  1. Wife spoke of sexual infidelity with 5 men
  2. Mocked D for visiting a suicide website
  3. said no longer wanted children
    - HoL - what was said amounted to extremely grave character and gave D justified sense of being wronged
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What happened in MAJEWSKI?

A
  • Took significant quantity of drugs over 48 hour period
  • Went to pub and got into fight
  • Landlord, then police tried to breakup the fight
  • After arrest, attacked Police Inspector the following day in his cell
  • 4 Counts of ABH and 3 of assualting a police officer
  • HoL could not rely on intoxication as a def
  • As assault occasioning ABH (S47) has basic intent, could not claim that unable to form MR due to intoxiacation as a defence.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

In what case did a stalker follow an ex-colleague?

A

CONTANZA

  • Stalked ex-colleague for 20 months
  • Over 800 threatening letters
  • would follw her home, wrote an offensive word on her door, drove past her house and stole washing from her line.
  • V suffered clinical depression
  • charged with ABH under S47
  • CofA upheld convition - immediacy present and words can amount to assault.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What case did V kill a child through a fire?

A

NEDRICK

  • D held grudge against V
  • Poured paraffin into letterbox and set light to it
  • Child died in fire
  • Convicted of murder after direction from judge which gave impression that they could infer intention
  • CofA - Jury should feel that death or a serious injury is a virtual certainty for murder. Substitued with manslaughter
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

In which case did a projectionist borrow films?

A

LLOYD

  • Chief projectionist at cinema
  • D took films and lent to associates to copy and distribute, then returned to cinema
  • Convicted of conspiracy to steal
  • Appealed and conviction quashed. No intention to permanantly deprive and no loss in value or usefulness
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

In which case was there a death on a level crossing?

A

PITWOOD

  • D employed to man gate at level crossing
  • Opened gate for a cart to pass, left gate open and went to lunch
  • Train later collided with horse and cart as gate left open
  • D liable for death of train driver in collision - guilty of manslaughter by omission
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly