Crim Homicide Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Mentally, what separates murder from manslaughter?

A

Murder requires killing to be accompanied by intention to kill or cause GBH. Manslaughter does not

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Can murder be committed by omission?

A

Yes, but rarely treated as such as very difficult to prove intention, direct or indirect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Can an unborn child be murdered?

A

No, but may constitute the separate offences of abortion and child destruction.

Legally life begins at birth

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What 3 conditions are required for death?

A
  1. Stops breathing
  2. Heart stops pumping
  3. Brain ceases to function
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Under common law, can a brain dead person be murdered?

A

No, legally considered dead ∴ cannot be murdered

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

In what case did a mother deliberately inject her son with heroin as he was in a permanant vegative state (PVS)?

A

INGLIS 2011:

  • Lawful for doctors to remove life support as their duty is to sustain life and this lasts only as long as the patient’s interests are being furthered.
  • Not Lawful if performed by stranger or member of patient’s family
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the MR for murder

A

Intention to kill (also know as express malice) or an intention to cause GBH to V

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Can you be guilty of murder if intention to kill is not intended, contemplated or even objectively foreseable?

A

Yes - will require a change of the law to remove this

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

If a jury can only prove that D foresaw the concequences of his actions to whatever degree of probability what can it establish?

A

Only recklessness - this is sufficient for manslaughter and but not murder

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

If D intends to cause V serious injury and V later dies as a result of a further event affected by the attack is D guilty of murder?

A

Provided D intended to cause V serious injury, this is enough to convict.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is constructive liability with regard to murder and causing serious injury?

A

Liability for murder is constructed out of elements of the lesser crime (causing GBH with intent).

Controversial as murder carries a mandatory life sentence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Which law established the Loss of Control partial defence to murder?

A

Coroners and Justice Act 2009

Limited the types of trigger available that were previously acceptable with the former defence of provocation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What two elements are required for a loss of self-control with regard to murder?

A

(i) D must lose self-control
(ii) Requires a trigger for loss of self-control, though not sudden. (A long delay between trigger and killing will weaken the defence)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What are the two qualifying triggers for loss of self-control?

A
  1. Fear of serious violence
  2. Thing or things done which led to:
    a. Circumstances of extremely grave character
    b. A justifiable sense of being seriously wronged
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is meant by circumstances of an extremely grave character?

A

Designed to filter out trivial triggers such as nagging, crying and sexual jealousy.
Sexual infidelity mentioned as NOT a trigger

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

In what case did a burgler attempt to appeal on the grounds of loss of control after being convicted of murder?

A

BOWYER (2013).

V was known to D. V made a number of extremely insulting remarks abouts D’s girlfriend leading to his murder by D. CoA ruled that defence not available as his status was as a burgler at that point.

17
Q

How does a revenge killing differ from loss of control?

A

A revenge killing is seen as being sufficiently meditated to negate the element of moral INVOLUTARINESS in a provoked killing

18
Q

In what case did a wife kill her husband by setting fire to his room after a long period of ill-treatment and brutality?

A

AHLUWALIA (1993)

  • D had attempted suicide on 2 occasions, but remained with D for over a decade.
  • Discovered that V was having an affair.
  • Convicted of murder
  • Duffy (1949) required that actions be sudden - would have better defence with new law
19
Q

When offered both the defences of loss of self-control and self-defence what is considered the most likely defence to win with?

A

Self-defence as once the loss of control defences is raised it may be hard to prove that self-defence took place even with strong evidence

20
Q

Loss of Self-Control, as with most defences, places the burden of proof on whom?

A

The burden of (dis)proof is on the prosecution

21
Q

Where act first contained the defence of diminished responsibility?

A

Homicide Act 1957