Large Group 3 Flashcards
What are the two essential requirements for creating a valid express trust?
- Declaration of trust: The settlor must declare the terms of the trust.
- Vesting of property: The trust property must be transferred to the trustee.
What is the significance of the case McPhail v Doulton in relation to express trusts?
The litigation in McPhail v Doulton lasted 10 years, demonstrating the importance of ensuring that a trust declaration is clear and complies with formalities. If the declaration is ambiguous, it can lead to lengthy legal disputes.
What are the three methods of creating a trust?
Self-declaration as trustee: The settlor declares themselves as trustee over their property.
Transfer of property to a trustee during the settlor’s lifetime: The settlor transfers the property to another trustee.
Creation of a trust by will: The settlor transfers property in their will to a trustee for the benefit of a beneficiary.
What formalities are required to declare a trust over land?
Under Section 53(1)(b) of the Law of Property Act 1925, a trust over land must be in writing and signed by the person capable of declaring the trust. Without written evidence, a trust over land is unenforceable.
Can a trust over personal property be created orally?
Yes, trusts over personal property (such as money, shares, or chattels) can be created orally or by conduct, although it is better to have them in writing for evidential purposes.
What is the ‘every effort test’ from Re Rose in relation to trusts?
The ‘every effort test’ states that if the settlor has done everything in their power to transfer the trust property, equity will treat the trust as valid, even if some formalities remain incomplete.
What is the rule from Strong v Bird?
If the trustee is also the executor of the settlor’s estate and the settlor intended to make an immediate gift, the gift becomes valid upon the settlor’s death.
What is the rule from Pennington v Waine?
If it would be unconscionable for the settlor to withdraw the gift or trust, equity may enforce the trust even if the transfer formalities are incomplete.
What are the three certainties required for a valid trust?
Certainty of intention: The settlor must intend to create a trust.
Certainty of subject matter: The trust property must be clearly identified.
Certainty of objects: The beneficiaries or class of beneficiaries must be clearly identified.
What is the significance of the case Knight v Knight?
Knight v Knight established the requirement of the three certainties—intention, subject matter, and objects—for a valid trust.
What are precatory words, and why don’t they create a trust?
Precatory words are expressions of hope, wish, or desire (e.g., “in full confidence”). They do not create a trust because they do not impose a clear duty on the trustee. The case of Adams v Kensington Vestry confirmed this.
What is the significance of Paul v Constance in relation to trusts?
In Paul v Constance, the court held that even without using the word “trust,” a trust can be created through the settlor’s words or conduct if it is clear they intended to create a trust.
What happens if the trust property is uncertain?
If the trust property is not clearly defined, the trust will fail, and the property remains with the settlor. For example, in Palmer v Simmonds, the trust was void because the term “bulk of my estate” was too vague.
What is the difference between tangible and intangible assets in trust law?
Tangible assets (like wine in Re London Wine Co.) must be physically separated to create a trust, while intangible assets (like shares in Hunter v Moss) do not require physical separation to create a valid trust.
What is a fixed trust?
In a fixed trust, the settlor specifies the exact shares or interests that each beneficiary will receive. The trustee has no discretion in distributing the trust property.