Large and small viral RNAs and their role in viral gene expression and evading host antiviral defense Flashcards
miRNA Details
- Originate mostly from capped & polyadenylated full length precursors (pri-miRNA)
- Generally transcribed by RNA polymerase II
- Hairpin precursor ~70 nt (pre-miRNA) long
- Mature miRNA ~22 nt long
- First miRNA discovered in 1993 by Victor Ambros (lin-4)
- Let-7 discovered in 2000 by Frank Slack and Gary Ruvkun
Small RNAs may regulate the function and stability of target mRNAs by different mechanisms
A: imperfect matches -> translational repression
B: perfect complementarity -> miRNA- mediated RISC cleavage and mRNA degradation
Biological significance of miRNA-mediated regulation
1 miRNAs emerge as key post transcriptional regulators of gene expression
2 Computational predictions suggest that a single miRNA may regulate more than hundred mRNAs
3 30-70% of animal genes may be subject to miRNA-mediated regulation
4 specific miRNAs have been implicated in diverse biological processes:
- Development
- Cellular differentiation
- Proliferation
- Apoptosis
- Oncogenesis
Model for microRNA-mediated regulation
- several different miRNAs can regulate a single mRNA (mRNA 5, mRNA 2 and mRNA 6)
- several different mRNAs can be regulated by one miRNA (mRNA 2, mRNA 5 and mRNA 6)
- the same mRNA target can contain multiple miRNA docking sites for the same miRNA (mRNA 7)
Production of miRNAs
Production of functional miRNAs is a multi-step process:
* Transcription of pri-miRNA precursors
* Imperfect hairpin release in the nucleus
* Export to the cytoplasm
* Dicer processing in the cytoplasm
* Strand selection by RISC complex
Biogenesis of miRNA
canonical pathway:
pri-miRNA processing occurs in two steps, catalysed by two members of the RNase III family of enzymes, Drosha and Dicer, operating in complexes with dsRNA-binding proteins (dsRBPs), for example DGCR8 and transactivation-responsive (TAR) RNA- binding protein (TRBP) in mammals.
non-canonical pathway:
pre-miRNAs are produced from very short introns (mirtrons) as a result of splicing and debranching, thereby bypassing the Drosha– DGCR8 step
Viruses interfere with host miRNA biogenesis
- Expression of viral proteins inhibiting miRNA loading into the host RISC complex (tomato bushy stunt virus p19 protein) or Ago2 activity (cucumber virus 2b protein).
- Flaviviruses sfRNA and Vaccinia virus inhibit or reduce the expression of Dicer activity in the infected cell (also Adenoviruses by expression of VA1 RNA)
- Herpesviruses encode viral sequences complementary to mature miRNAs miR-17 and miR-27 resulting in degradation and inhibition of the miRNA-induced regulation of mRNA targets.
miRNAs and Viruses
- miRNAs of viral and cellular origin can positively or negatively influence viral replication
- viral miRNAs can directly alter host cell physiology, including components of the immune system
- host miRNAs can alter virus life cycle
Why would viruses exploit cellular and virus-encoded miRNAs?
* miRNAs are non-immunogenic
* take up a small amount of genomic space
* can be expressed in large amounts
* are powerful regulators of gene expression
* remarkable functional flexibility
* function without the need of translation into a protein product- fast response
Potential effects of cellular miRNAs on virus replication
1) Cellular miRNAs may bind directly viral RNAs and promote viral replication: proviral
2) Cellular miRNAs may mediate the recognition of viral RNAs by RISC thereby directly limiting viral replication: antiviral
3) Cellular miRNAs might indirectly promote or limit virus replication through regulation of their endogenous cellular mRNA targets: proviral or antiviral
Effect of cellular miRNAs on viruses:
1. impact on viral genome evolution
2. Regulation of tissue tropism of viruses in vivo
Host miRNAs Can Directly Block Viral Replication
- Enterovirus 71 (EV71): Elevated levels of miR-296-5p were detected in Enterovirus 71 (EVtq)- infected cells. miR-296-5p targets both capsid protein VP1 and VP3 coding regions in the viral genome as a response to viral infection.
- Coxsackievirus B3 (CVB3): miR-342-5p targets the 2C-coding region of the viral RNA, which results in its degradation
- Herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1): Lytic replication and reactivation form latency depend on the expression of viral infected Cell Protein 0 (ICP0), which is controlled by the cell-specific miR-138 in neurons
Host miRNAs can directly improve RNA virus replication
-> The unusual interaction between host miRNA and increasing amounts of viral RNA during replication results in a reduction of the interaction of the host miRNA with its cellular targets (“sponge effect”).
RNA viruses can be dependent on cellular miRNAs and connect virus-induced miRNA sequestration to host transcriptome regulation
*Pestiviruses critically depend on cellular miR-17 and let-7
*Pestiviral RNA functionally reduces miR-17 binding on endogenous mRNA targets
Hepatitis C Virus RNA Functionally Sequesters cellular miR-122
- HCV RNA functionally reduces miR-122 binding on endogenous mRNA targets
- HCV miRNA sponging can be redirected by swapping viral miRNA tropism
Viruses exploit direct interactions with host miRNAs: Modulation of hepatitis C virus RNA abundance by a liver-specific MIcroRNA
- miRNA122 is preferentially expressed in the liver
- miRNA122 regulates fatty acid and cholesterol synthesis central to liver function
*HCV RNA synthesis is stimulated by cellular miRNA-122
*Binding of miR-122 to the 5‘UTR increases the abundance of HCV RNA
*Stimulation is conferred by direct interaction of miR-122 with two target sites in the 5‘UTR of the HCV genome.
Liver-specific expression of miRNA122 may contribute to the tissue tropism of HCV
miR-122 Stimulates Hepatitis C Virus RNA synthesis by Altering the Balance of Viral RNAs Engaged in Replication versus Translation
- The microRNA miR-122 and PCBP2 jointly regulate HCV genome circularization and thereby influence engagement of the RNAn in the mutually incompatible processes of viral RNA synthesis and translation.
- Binding of PCBP2 to sequences near the 5’ and 3’ ends of the viral positive-strand RNA ((*)RNA) provides a protein bridge that promotes genome circularization and facilitates IRES-initiated translation.
- Competition of miR-122 with PCBP2 for binding to the 5’ UTR: promoting open, noncircular genome conformation
- miR-122 may also induce changes in the conformation of the IRES.
- Consequence: reduction in translation and an increase in the initiation of negative-strand RNA ((_)RNA) synthesis (possibly owing to a greater availability of the 3’ UTR for interactions with the HCV replicase)
A model for interaction of miR-122 with the 5’ UTR of the HCV RNA and miravirsen’s mechanism of action
Miravirsen (SPC3649) is a high-affinity 15-mer LNA modified antimiR oligonucleotide that acts by sequestering mature miR-122, leading to inhibition of miR-122 function and thereby suppression of HCV
Hepatitis B virus-human chimeric transcript HBx-LINE1 promotes hepatic injury via sequestering cellular microRNA-122
- hybrid HBV-human transcript common in HBV-associated HCC cases serves to functionally sequester miR-122
- by depleting cellular miR-122, HBx-LINE1 promotes the expression of WNT1 protein
- Enhanced WNT1-expression causes up regulation of beta-catenin signaling, epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), enhanced cell migration and invasion
- promoting HBV-linked HCC progression
The differentially expressed miRNAs induced by EV71 infection: up-regulated levels of cellular miR-141 suppress eIF4E expression
eIF4E mRNA is a target of miR-141!
Model for the regulatory role of miR-141 in enterovirus infection
The upregulation of EGR1 induced by the Enterovirus infection increases cellular miR-141 expression.
miR-141 represses the expression of eIF4E via imperfect base pairing between miR-141 and the 3‘UTR of eIF4E mRNA.
The reduction in eIF4E causes a protein synthesis switch from cap- dependent to cap-independent translation
Contribution to viral pathogenesis and virus propagation.
Host miRNAs Can Act As Proviral Factors by Inhibiting Antiviral Host Factors
miR-146a expression is increased upon virus infection (VSV, JEV or DenV)
The proviral function of miR-146a is explained by the reduction of target mRNA expression for IRAK1, IRAK2, or TRAF6 which are essential partners of the type I interferon response
Viruses can up regulate Host miRNAs to promote their replication via the miRNA-mediated inhibition of the Jak/STAT signaling pathway
- Cellular miRNAs (miR-9041, miR-9850, miR29a and miR-373) are upregulated during DNA or RNA virus infections.
- The proviral function of cellular miRNAs is explained by the reduction of target mRNAs coding for key elements of the JAK/STAT signaling pathway resulting in a reduced expression of interferon-induced genes.
Virus encoded miRNAs
Virus-encoded miRNAs can be grouped into two classes
- Viral miRNAs that are analogs of host miRNAs
- Viral miRNAs that are viral specific
most functions ascribed to virus-encoded miRnAs can be grouped in the following categories:
1) Prolonging longevity of infected cells
2) evading the immune response
3) regulating host or viral genes to limit the lytic cycle
Most of the virus-encoded miRNAs share their biogenesis pathway with cellular miRNAs
- Virus-encoded miRNAs can affect both viral and cellular transcripts
The minority of viruses utilize non canonical mechanisms in the biogenesis of pre-miRNA molecules
- Herpesvirus saimiri (HVS) encodes Sm class U RNAs (HSURs) that are transcribed by RNA Pol II and subsequently processed by the host Integrator complex to generate pre-miRNAs
- The miRNAs encoded by mouse gammaherpesvirus 68 (MHV68) and BLV are both transcribed by host RNA Pol III
- MHV68 miRNAs are processed from larger tRNA-like RNAs by host tRNase Z and possibly additional factors to generate pre-miRNAs