Language Development II Flashcards

1
Q

Language development II three questions…

A

1/ Do we learn language?
2/ Or is language innate?
3/ What is the evidence?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

How do we acquire language and whit limitations are there?

A

The specific language we learn depends on our environment, eg., parents, teachers etc.
The environment has to contribute- but are their limits on what we can learn? Eg, we can learn words but how to we come to acquire abstract grammatical rules?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What core themes in developmental psychology does the language debate highlight?

A

The Nature Vs Nurture debate and the general or specialised learning processes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Nature vs Nurture view point?

A

Is language the product of the environment or out genes? To what extent to they interact?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

General or specialised learning view point?

A

Do we use ‘general-purpose’ processes to learn language? Or do we need specific cognitive skills to acquire language?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Who was learning theory devised by?

A

Influential American psychologist B.F. Skinner.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What did Skinner argue about language?

A

In VERBAL BEHAVIOUS (1957) he argued that language is learnt from the environment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What can be applied to the task of learning language according to Skinner and learning theory?

A

General associative learning (e.g., operant conditioning) can be applied to the task of learning language.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What was the implication of Skinner’s view point?

A

That language development does not require specialised learning processes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is learning theory?

A
The process where parents reward and encourage correct language use. Also, children imitate adult language, such as longer sentences, and this can be reinforced by parents.
Eg,
Child: It breaked
Mother: Yes it broke
Child: Truck broke
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Problem for learning theory in relation to grammar?

A

Rule based errors: Children learn and overuse grammatical rules, such as the regular past tense… ‘Sam go-ed to the zoo’…. So do children simply memorise specific sentences?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Problem for learning theory in relation to utterances?

A

Children also create novel utterances which they would not have learnt from parents.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Problem for learning theory in relation to reinforcement?

A

There may be a lack of correction from parents as they tend not to explicitly correct children’s grammatical errors - they respond more to the meanings of the child’s language.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Problem for learning theory in relation to speed of development?

A

General stages are consistent across children with language development - but not all parents reinforce the same, Language is a complex system but develops quickly and if children’s language depends on memorizing specific examples, how can it be so rapid?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Who devised the connection between language and nativism?

A

The American linguist and philosopher Noam Chomsky

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What did Noam Chomsky dispute?

A

Noam Chomsky disputed Skinner’s claims that language is learnable and he believed that children develop mental rules (grammar) but they cannot learn these rules from the environment.

17
Q

What does Chomsky argue about language development?

A

Chomsky argues that grammar is unlearnable from the environment as a child’s language exposure is not sufficient for learning abstract grammatical rules eg, children don’t receive enough examples of what is NOT grammatical in their language.

18
Q

So, what does Chomsky suggest about grammar?

A

That children require innate knowledge of grammar.

19
Q

What are Chomsky’s key ideas?

A

Universal Grammar (UG) and Language Acquisition Device (LAD)

20
Q

What is universal grammar (UG)?

A

A set of universal grammatical rules which apply to all languages. Chomsky also suggests that grammatical differences between languages are merely variant forms of deeper regularities and that all humans are equipped with universal grammar.

21
Q

What is the language acquisition device (LAD)

A
An innate module in the brain which provides humans with knowledge of universal grammar. The LAD is specialised for language, and is the product of biological maturation.
(environmental influence is minimal).
22
Q

Is language in the brain?

A

There is a lateralization of function as for most people language is processed in the left hemisphere of the brain.

23
Q

What happens in Broca’s area of the brain?

A

Language production.

24
Q

What happens in the Wernicke’s area of the brain?

A

Language comprehension.

25
Q

Where is language production in the brain?

A

Broca’s area

26
Q

Where is language comprehension in the brain?

A

Wernicke’s area.

27
Q

Evidence for language being innate (Brains and Genes)?

A
Specific Language Impairment makes is difficult to learn language despite otherwise normal cognitive functioning. SLI is hereditary=genetic.
 The genetic deficit selectively impairs language, not other cognitive processes. This is consistent with a module specialised for language.
28
Q

Evidence against Chomsky and grammar being innate? (critical periods).

A

Lenneberg (1967) – Language must be acquired during the period of brain lateralization.
Story of ‘Genie’ – Child deprived of human interaction and language between 20 months to 13 years- Then, grammatical knowledge was limited even after years of remedial language training.

29
Q

Evidence that grammar is innate to humans? (babies vs Chimps)

A

Famous attempts to teach language systems to chimpanzees and gorillas… Kanzi learnt to communicate by selecting symbols on a computer screen. Used short combinations of words which conformed to a crude grammar. ‘If sarah good then apple’.

However – these primates were never able to progress beyond the early grammatical skills of a toddler. Suggests that other intelligent species cannot fully master language just from being exposed to language.

But could be experimenter Bias.

30
Q

Three problems for nativism?

A

1/ Disputed evidence
2/ Univeral Grammar?
3/ Rethinking learning

31
Q

In relation to problems for nativism, explain disputed evidence.

A

People with SLI might simply have a problem with auditory processing.

32
Q

In relation to problems for nativism, explain universal grammar.

A

We have yet to identify a single set of rules which capture the grammar of all languages.

33
Q

In relation to problems for nativism, rethinking learning.

A

Statistical learning can be used to detect regularities in language.

34
Q

Conclusions of Language development II.

A

1/ Two opposing perspectives on language acquisition:
a. Language is learnt from the environment via general learning processes.
b. Grammar cannot be learnt. A language-specific module specifies basic grammatical rules.
2/ The evidence does not fully favour either perspective.
3. Currently, many researchers of language development argue that there is an interaction between genes and the environment.