L9 - Asymmetric Information Flashcards
How is asymmetric information defined?
one part has better information than the other party
What is adverse selection?
a market process in which ‘bad’ products or customers are more likely to be sleeccted than ‘good’ products
How is Moral hazard defined?
- the risk that one party to a contract will change the behaviour to the detriment of the other party once the contract has been signed
What do tranditional models assume about markets?
- Traditional models of markets assume that buyers have complete information about the product they are buying.
- However, sellers might have information about the product, for example its quality, that they withhold from buyers.
- Similarly situations might arise when the buyer of a product has information they withhold from the seller of the product.
- Asymmetric information exists whenever one party to an economic transaction possesses greater material knowledge than the other party to the transaction.
What are some examples of asymmetric information?
- The seller of a good or service normally has greater knowledge than the buyer. This is especially important in the case of second hand goods such as cars, computers and so on.
- The buyer of insurance often has superior knowledge of risk in the transaction than the seller. –> lying to insurance courses, health insurance has specific exclusion clauses, are you less careful when you taken out insurance
- A customer applying for a bank loan will have greater knowledge about the use to which the funds will be put than the provider of the loan.
- Company managers possess greater knowledge of the company they manage than the owners of the company.
- Potential employees know more about their suitability for a particular appointment than the potential employer and so on.
What do economist traditionally argue about allocation of resources in a market?
Traditionally economists argue that markets allocate resources efficiently. Prices reflect the value consumers place on a product (the value of the last marginal unit they consumed) and the value of the resources used to produce the product. In equilibrium, these two valuations coincide. Hence the argument that markets allocate resources efficiently
- but when asymmetric information exist supply and demand may be affected, consumers preferences may not be accurately reflected in the demand function, or supply doesnt reflect the value society places on the product (sub-optimal production decisiosn)
What did Akerlof summise from the second-hand car market?
- Akerlof (1970) first outlined the problem using the example of second hand cars.
- The owners of second hand cars know the full story of the car, the buyers do not!
- The market consists of a whole range of second hand cars ranging from high quality to low quality. Following Akerlof (1970) we assume that only high quality and low quality second hand cars exist. Akerlof referred to the latter as ‘lemons’.
what are the implication of Akerlof’s Model?
- Because of asymmetric information, buyers will only be willing to pay average prices for ALL cars. But this does NOT reflect the average quality of high value second hand cars offered for sale and is more representative of the average quality low value second hand cars.
What is the formal problem of Akerlof’s Model?
Assume – Two kinds of cars high quality and low quality.
- Buyers and sellers can distinguish between the cars.
- There will be two markets – one for high quality and one for low quality.
- High quality market SH is supply and DH is demand for high quality. Low quality market SL is supply and DL is demand for low quality
- Sellers know more about the quality of the used car than the buyers, so how will buyers judge quality
The analysis above implies that the existence of asymmetric information leads to good quality cars being under-consumed and low quality cars being over-consumed in relation to the true preferences of consumers.
- Because of asymmetric information, the used car market adversely selects the cars that will be offered for sale.
- This implies that when asymmetric information is present, markets fail to allocate resources optimally.
Why is asymmetric information a particular problem in financial markets?
In financial markets, economists distinguish between two problems arising from asymmetric information:
- Adverse selection is the problem investors experience in distinguishing low-risk borrowers from high-risk borrowers before making an investment or granting a loan.
- Moral hazard is the risk that economic agents will take actions after they have entered into a transaction that will make the other party worse off. –> charge higher payment, but you have incentive to pay that as risky ventures have a higher payout if they work
How does asymmetric information occur in the stock market?
- Assume 80% of stocks are good quality stocks with a price of €100 and 20% are lemons (poor quality stock) with a price of €20. –> the expected price of the stock is €84, but to a good firm this is below the fundamental value of the stock - market isnt allocating resources efficiently
- The implication is that good quality firms will be less willing to issue stock and will seek other sources of finance.
- Conversely poor quality firms will obtain more for their stock than its fundamental value and will issue more stock.
How are banks affected by asymmetric information?
- A bank has a population of borrowers to lend to and, whilst these will be a whole spectrum of risk categories, for simplicity we divide these into safe and risky borrowers.
- banks usually lend on trust, they have done business with you before, but if you now see opportunities you wouldnt have normally taken (your risk profile has changed), the banks dont necessary know that you are going to take more of these risky investments
- High risk firms have an incentive to conceal their level of risk exposure in order to borrow at lower rates.
- to solve this issue banks lumped different risk categories together and take the average, this means that low risk borrowers are having to pay a higher rate of interest compared to the risk category they fall into, high risk firms are charged a lower rate of interest that the risk category they would be placed into
- in the world of insurance, business risk is the only thing that cant be insured against,
- as high risk firms have more incentive to pay the interest, banks are selecting the wrong customers, markets are failing again.
What are the problems small investors face due to asymmetric information?
- Small firms to medium sized are more dependant on loan finance than large firms and depend on financial intermediaries to meet their financial needs.
- Banks know a great deal about their customers, but problems of asymmetric information, leading to adverse selection and moral hazard, still exist
What are the problems small firms face due to asymmetric information?
Smaller firms are inherently more risky than larger firms and are many times more likely to go bankrupt.
Banks cannot solve the problem by charging higher rates of interest to risky borrowers because these borrowers have an incentive to conceal their true exposure to risk
A particular problem arises during a recession as witnessed during the heavy recession of 2008.
The financial health of firms and households deteriorated markedly and the number of ‘lemon borrowers’ increased relative to the number good quality borrowers.
- firms went bust during the recession, which led to even more loan contracts not being fulfill - banks tried to cover themselves which led to credit rationing but this forced even more businesses to close
What is the role of information providers?
- The problem is partly alleviated by private firms who collect and sell information on other firms.
- Information is collected from such sources as firms income statements, balance sheets and investment decisions.
- The information advantage banks gain from this allows them to reduce the cost of adverse selection and explains the key role banks play in providing external finance to firms.- this only works if the information is correct though
Why is the problem of asmmetric information and moral hazard not so easily overcome?
- During the financial crisis, the rating agencies were approached to re-structure debt arising from the burst of the property bubble.
- There are allegations that different rating agencies were approached with a view to issuers of CDO’s receiving the highest rating.
- When defaults started rising, questions were asked about how the ratings were derived.
The problem of providing an accurate rating of a firm?
In reality, providing an accurate rating is fraught with difficulty.
Some potentially good quality firms might be quite young and there might be insufficient history to enable an altogether accurate assessment of the quality of these firms to be made.
lemon agencies have the incentive to portray their firm in the best light, which may not be necessarily true
What is Securitisation?
-Securitisation involves bundling loans such as mortgages into securities that can be sold in financial markets. –> moves the assets off the balance sheet of the banks
The traditional focus of banking has been relationship banking and an originate to hold model ( i make you a loan and hold it till maturity). The emergence of securitisation changed the focus of banks into an originate to distribute model
- they will make the loan, bundle it up in the securitisation, and sell it to the market where they will receive payments from the markets, and the buyer of the bundle receive interest from components of the securitised debt
- as banks have moved toward the originate to distribute model, banks have less incentive to look at who they are making the loans to, as they are no longer holding onto the risk