L9 - 11 Flashcards
What does promiscuous interfaces mean when it is regarding the human mind?
Another way of saying different modules can share notes
Why are paradoxes the route to defining the limits of these powerful system?
Self-reference - going on forever (infinity) generate paradoxes. They are hard to avoid in formal systems (even those designed to avoid them)
Does the set of all sets that do not contain themselves, contain itself?
Russell’s paradox - The sets of all sets that are not members of themselves is a member of itself if it is not a member of itself.
Imagine a barber that shaves everyone that does not shave themselves.
Does he shave himself also? But if he does shave himself – then he is shaving someone that does shave themselves. But if he doesn’t shave himself – then he is not shaving everyone that does not shave themselves.
Difference between induction and deduction?
Deduction is from general to specific - using theory/general statement to generate observations
e.g. Dr.Seuss hates cats, provide supporting examples, you can deduce he hates cats
Induction is using observations/questions to generate theories.
e.g. How does Dr.Seuss feel about cats? Cat looks weird and does dumb things. He doesn’t like cats.
Does the fundamental limits to formal systems of logic also include arithmetic? What is this limit?
Yes – this limit is that not all true statements can be derived by the system HENCE system is incomplete.
T/F – Formal systems are limited because they are inconsistent
F
Define algorithm
A process or set of rules to be followed in calculations or other problem-solving operations e.g. Addition
Define recursion
Recursion occurs when a thing is defined in terms of itself or of its type. It is essentially defining an infinite set of objects by a finite statement
Principia Mathematica – what is it?
Provides the logic foundation of maths and in a way that avoided the paradoxes that arise from self-reference. It could never be completed.
Truth is bigger than proof - you can prove things by informal systems like principia Mathematica but there will always be things that are true that you cannot prove
Truth is bigger than proof - you can prove things by informal systems like principia Mathematica but there will always be things that are true that you cannot prove
What is Godel’s first incompleteness theorem? What about his second one?
First - no logical system can capture all the truths of maths
Second – logical maths system will contain inconsistency (no logical system for maths could, by its own devices, be shown to be free from inconsistency)
Did Godel show that maths is inconsistent?
No but he did show that if you want to be sure your maths is going to be free of contradiction, then it will, necessary, be incomplete
Godel: One cannot claim - with any certainty, of any formal system that all conceptual considerations are representable in it as there are things that are true that you just cannot get to in that formal system
Godel: One cannot claim - with any certainty, of any formal system that all conceptual considerations are representable in it as there are things that are true that you just cannot get to in that formal system
Define proposition
A sentence which is either true or false
Define axiom
A statement or proposition which is regarded as being established, accepted, or self-evidently true