L7 - Rocky Shore Ecosystems II Flashcards

1
Q

Aim

Demonstrate how biological interactions influence species distribution & abundance

Use of manipulative experiments to test ecological theory

A

Marine Biology: An Ecological Approach, Nybakken, Chapter 6 pp 236-245

Marine Biology, Function, Biodiversity, Ecology, Levinton, Chapter 14 pp 305-333

Coastal Marine Ecology, Underwood & Chapman, Chapter 5

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Zonation

-Concept that organisms occur in discrete bands driven by exposure

-Outdated, organisms are patchy in their distribution

  • Tolerance to desiccation
  • Transplant experiments & polar bears
  • Birth place of manipulative ecology and experiment design
A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Key biological interactions

Competition

Grazing

Predation

Recruitment

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Competition: Barnacles

Pioneering work by Connell on Scottish intertidal shores

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Grazing

  • Experiments by Underwood (1980) in NSW
  • Observation: Ulva is restricted to the lower midlittoral region of the shore

Explanations

Grazing?

Desiccation?

Encrusting species?

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Grazing: Experimental Design

Roof (clear/not cleared) -Desiccation +grazing

Cage (clear/not clear) -Desiccation - grazing

Fence (clear/not clear) +Desiccation - grazing

Control (clear/not clear) +Desiccation + grazing

A

Grazing: Results

Within a month for ulva to restore 100%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Grazing: Results

Light reduction from biota settling on enhabiting cage reduced photosynthesis

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Predation

West Coast USA community structure

Community manipulations by Dayton & Paine

*Logs/debri removed encrusting community with Impact

A

Predator removal

  • Starfish are active predators during high tide
  • Predation defines lower limit of mussels
  • Mussels are dominant space competitor
  • Succession
  • Keystone predator

*Seastar constantly opening up new colenisation areas

*Removing starfish *keystone predator then habitat dominated by one species that benefits from starfish predatorial absense

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Keystone Predators

Keystone predators have a disproportionately large effects on their communities relative to their biomassa

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Predator-grazer interactions

Subtle effects of grazers & predators on barnacle diversity

Complicated experimental design

starfish exclusion

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Predation & community dynamics

High predation = low diversity

Innefective predation = outbreak of competitive dominant

Middle ground predation = Predator-mediated coexistance

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Disturbances & Recruitment

West Coast USA

Recovery determined by patch size and larval availability

A

Scale of disturbances

Mussel survival and patch size, East Coast USA

Patches cleared and planted with mussels, survival monitored

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Disturbances & stable states

Localised disturbances can result in several alternative stable states

Following clearance successional patterns may differ due to larval availability

eg. East Coast USA

A

Summary

Be able to describe how biological interactions regulate organism distribution on the rocky shore

Importance of disturbances in maintaining species diversity

Availability of new recruits

Disturbances and how they affect biota

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q
A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly