L5 - Aggregate Supply and the Short-Run Tradeoff Between Inflation and Unemployment Flashcards
What do all the Model of Short-run Aggregate Supply converge to?
output is positively related to the deviation between the actual price level and expected price level
What are some assumptions about the sticky-wage model of SRAS?
- Assumes that firms and workers negotiate contracts and fix the nominal wage before they knwon what the price level will turn out to be
- Nominal Wage, W, they set is the product of a target real wage,ω, and the expected price level
So nominal wage = the target real wage * expect price level
so the real wage which is W/P is the target real wage * the ratio of expected prices to real price level
How can the sticky-wage model be derived mathematically?
- Firms will have an equilibrium level of unemployment where the Marginal Product of Labour (MPL - additional output of an extra unit of labour ) = the real wage(W/P) –> this is the real cost of hiring a worker for the firm
- Therefore there is a negative relationship between the demand for labour and the real wage –> as the lower the real wage the more people a firm employ
- However if Labour demand depend on the target real wage -> Ld(ω) then the level of employment depends on the natural rate of unemployment L(bar) (bar normally means fixed) –> NAIRU??
- The natural rate of unemployment means when output is at its natural level –> when L is at L(bar) , Y is at Y(bar) –> this is the economy’s long run position
- Capital is fixed in this model
What does the sticky wage model look like on a graph?
- when prices increase, our real wage falls, so labour increases, output therefore increases
- As Prices have deviated from what we have expected it to be, both labour and output have deviated from their natural level
What is the implication of the Marginal Product of Labour formula?
What is the flaw of the sticky wage model?
Implies that the real wage should be counter-cyclical , it should move in the opposite direction as output over the course of business cycles:
- In booms, when P typically rises, the real wage should fall.
- In recessions, when P typically falls, the real wage should rise.
•This prediction does not come true in the real world –> the real wage has actual been shown to be pro-cyclical, meaning when we have booms wages increase and in recessions they decrease or acyclical meaning it has no relationship with economic cycles
What are the two pieces of empirical evidence about the sticky-wage model?
Barsky and Solon (1989)
Sumner and Silver (1989)
What did Barsky and Solon (1989) say about the sticky-wage model?
- Barsky and Solon (1989) starts by quoting three studies, all published in the 1980s, which concluded that real wages were, in turn, acyclical, procyclical, and countercyclical.
- Looking at industry-wide data, Barsky and Solon (1989) find that there is little if any evidence of countercyclical real wages.
- Studies of micro data, however, provide quite strong evidence of procyclicality in the real wage. –> which correlates with wages in the US real wage –> output are real wage rise together
- Barsky and Solon (1989) find procyclicality when they look at data from the Panel Study of Income Dynamics, which studies the behavior of individual households. These findings are broadly in accordance with those of Bils (1985), who studied microeconomic data from the National Longitudinal Survey.
What did Sumner and Silver (1989) say about the sticky-wage model?
- Sumner and Silver (1989), note that results on the cyclicality of the real wage are sensitive to sample period.
- the data are consistent with sticky-wage theories.
- Basically, their argument is that shocks to aggregate demand will cause prices to be procyclical and shocks to aggregate supply will cause prices to be countercyclical.
- If nominal wages are sticky, then we should observe procyclical real wages when inflation is countercyclical, and vice versa. This is borne out by the data.
What are reasons for sticky prices?
Firms do not always change their prices immediately when AD changes and they remain the same for a shoret-period of time, so reasons for this are:
- Long-term contracts between firms and customers
- menu costs –> cost of repricing (changing on computer systems, menus, on shelfs, new barcodes)
- firms do ot wish to annoy customers with freuqent price changes
What is the assumption for the stick-price model?
Firms set their own prices (as in monopolistic competition)
What is a individual firm’s desired price in the sticky-price model?
p = desired price
P = overall price level
Y-Y(bar)= Aggregate output - Natural level of output
a = how responsive a firms prices are to changes to output around its natural level
In a boom (when output exceeds the natural level) their is an inflationary effect on the price level and a firms desired price level rises
What are the two types of firms in the sticky price model?
firms with sticky prices –> base P and Y on expectation (E) because they do not have all the information so they must anticipate what they must be
What assumption do we make about sticky-price firms?
That EY = EY(bar) thus making the bracket 0
Using this assumption the pricing strategy for the sticky-price firm is p=EP –> just based on expected prices
How do you derive the overall price level for the sticky- price model?
- To derive the aggregate supply curve first we must find an expression for the overall price level –> if s = the fraction of firms with sticky prices thus (1-s) = the fraction of firms with flexible prices we can derive the overall price level as follows: