L3 Marketing Research Flashcards
Data:
- implication of being quantifiable
- conseq of quantity
- does not equal important
- there’s a lot -> find the meaningful one, w a theory
Data:
- Primary VS secondary
- Internal VS external
- collected for the study at hand VS for other purposes
- collected by company itself VS by others
The 3 main steps of data-related research projects
- theoretical concept (research Q in a broader picture)
- operationalization = define n measure
- data (collection)
prevalence of unknown parameters in marketing analysis: why? solution?
Coz we lack data from other org units, or due to confidentiality. > use marketing intelligence data = census & industry reports
5=1+3+1 reasons for Marketing Research:
best one:
- Base for taking decisions
3 political PrPrCs:
- Prestige
- PR
- Consensus seeking
worst one:
- procrastinating decisions
3 Reactions to MR in short n 3 in long term,
across the 3 same dimensions
short term: gradual adaptation f comm, easy to chg features, repositioning
Long term: new biz strat, new product, new market…
How to discover consumers’ needs?
1=4+2 methods
+ 8 techniques
with qualitative marketing research e.g.:
- short term:
- Focus groups –> test new product in dev.
- In-depth interviews –> get new product ideas
- problem-centered interviews
- observation
- long term:
- Delphi method –> find (tech) long term changes
- weak signal research –> predict uncertain future
- observation
+ 6 techniques:
- Critical incidents
- Laddering (why? why? …)
- Brainstorming
- Free association
- Collages
- “Planet-game”
- text analysis
-
projective techniques:
- Thematic Apperception Tests
- word association test
- sentence completion test
- third person techniques
Research design 3 design (type)s + their methods
- Exploratory design < qualitative
- Descriptive < qualitative n quantitative (panels, surveys, secondary data)
- Experimental design < test hyp. w experiments (the only really scientific type according to some)
Lab vs field experiments: tradeoffs
Controlling all variables vs realism
weakness of descriptive research
“correlation does not imply causation”
to infer causal relationship X>Y in research, 3 conditions must be satisfied
- X & Y happen together
- X does not happen after Y
- other possible causes are excluded
Experiment - Variables, 3 types
- independent Vs > get manipulated
- dependent Vs > presumably affected n observed
- extraneous Vs > all other Vs that could presumably affect result
Experimental designs:
2 dims w 2 values each
(quasi- aka natural experiment VS experiment)
-> randomization, w control group, is NOT vs YES possible
x
(field VS laboratory)
-> realistic: high reliability = few confounding factors & construct stableness
VS
controlled: high external validity = generalizability & stability across different contexts
4=1+3 main differences bw qual & quant R
typical goal:
- goal: dev initial understanding vs recommend final decision
- properties:*
- unstructured vs structured
- non-statistical vs statistical
- Nrs: small vs big
- that’s why C-level mgrs often prefer quant R
Delphi method:
def
limit
+ 2 strengths
- 2 weaknesses
iteratively sending questionnaires to experts
but are experts really better than normal ppl in their knowledge of reality / future?
+ 2 Strengths
- No need to bring experts together physically
- No focus groups or discussion effects
- 2 Weaknesses
- Hard to retain panelists
- Future developments not always predicted correctly by iterative consensus