L2 - Biological Explanations Of SZ Flashcards
What are the two main factors in biological explanations of schizophrenia?
Genetic basis and neural correlates including the dopamine hypothesis
How are genetic factors tested in schizophrenia research?
Through family, twin, and adoption studies
Family studies
- find ppl with SZ & see if biological relatives are similarly affected more then non-biological relatives
- Gottesman (1991) found if that the chances of getting SZ:
- 46% if both parents are schizophrenic
- 13% if one parent is schizophrenic
- 9% if a sibling has schizophrenia
- This shows a clear trend that closer genetic relatedness increases the risk of developing schizophrenia.
Twin studies
- They investigate the nature/nurture debate regarding heredity and environmental influences
- Monozygotic twins share 100% of their genes, while dizygotic twins share 50%
- Gottesman (1991) found the concordance rates are:
- 48% for monozygotic twins
- 17% for dizygotic twins
- Higher concordance in monozygotic twins supports the genetic basis of schizophrenia, as more genetically similar, more likely to get SZ
More twin study support
- Joseph (2004) did a review of twin studies carried up to 2001 & found concordance rates to be
- 40% for monozygotic twins
- 7.4% for dizygotic twins
- still relatively high for MZ twins
- reinforces the idea that genetics play a significant role in schizophrenia
What is the purpose of adoption studies in schizophrenia research?
- To understand the influence of nature and nurture by observing adopted individuals with biological parents diagnosed with schizophrenia
- Tienari et al. (2001) carried out a study in Finland using 164 ppt whose bio mothers had SZ
- 6.7% of adoptees with biological mothers diagnosed with SZ were also diagnosed
- 2% in a control group of adoptees of 197 ppt (parents don’t have SZ)
- although percentage is low, there is a small link between SZ genes with children whose bio mothers were schizophrenic
- although not as good as gottesman studies
What does it mean that schizophrenia is considered polygenic?
- It means that multiple genes contribute to the risk of developing schizophrenia
- combination of different genes that have been implicated in SZ
- there are specific candidate genes that are associated with SZ e.g. PCM1
chromosome study
- Gurling et al (2006) used family study evidence indicating that SZ was associated with Chromosome 8p21-22 to identify a high risk sample
- gene mapping also used to implicate PCM1 gene in susceptibility to SZ
- also benzel et al. (2007)
Benzel et al. (2007)
- used gene mapping to find evidence suggesting that NRG3 gene variants interact with NRG1 and ERBB4 gene variants to create susceptibility to develop SZ suggesting interaction of genetic factors
What did Ripke et al (2014) find in their comparison of genetic makeup of schizophrenia patients and controls?
108 separate genetic variations associated with increased risk of schizophrenia
Genes that were particularly vulnerable were the ones that had so,e connection to the functioning of certain neurotransmitters such as dopamine
This study involved a large sample size of 37,000 SZ patients and 113,000 controls.
Evaluation of the genetic basis of SZ
strengths
- research support
weaknesses
- separating nature vs nurture
- absence of family history
- biologically reductionist
- diathesis stress model
Research support (genes)
There is a wealth of research evidence to support the genetic basis for SZ as can be seen from the findings of Gottesman, Joseph’s and Tienari’s study, thus there is a link between genes and SZ. This is a strength because it shows that if a child grows up in a family where both their biological parents has SZ, then the chances of them getting it is heightened compared to if only one parent or none of the parents have it suggesting that genetics is an important factor
Separating nature from nurture
However, the problem with twin and family studies is separating nature (genes) from nurture (the environment). For example, MZ twins are normally reared together and sent to the same school, where the same clothes (in childhood), this then makes it difficult to separate upbringing from genes. Even if we look at adoption studies that attempt to separate genes from the environment, children tend to be adopted by relatives who may still rear the child similarly to its biological parents – thus adoption studies may not always be a good comparison for the effects of nature and nurture.
Absence of family history
More importantly, SZ can take place in the absence of a family history. One explanation is that there may be a mutation in parental DNA, for example in paternal sperm cells. This can be caused by radiation, poison or infection. Evidence for role of mutation comes from Brown et al’s. (2002) study which showed a positive correlation between paternal age and increased risk of SZ increasing from around 0.7% with fathers under 25 to over 2% in fathers over 50. This suggests that although no direct genes are involved, a person can still get SZ if their father was older at the time of fertilisation. This suggests that the role of nature and nurture may both play a part rather than just genes
Biologically reductionist
The Genetic explanation of SZ is also biologically reductionist as it is stating that one cause of SZ is simply your genes. In other words it is insinuating that if you possess the PCM1 gene then you will have SZ. This means that this explanation is ignoring other factors such as psychological factors and family upbringing which could be more important in explaining SZ – for example it has been found that certain parenting styles (e.g. the schizophrenogenic mother) in an individuals childhood could trigger symptoms of SZ in adulthood