L12: Hypokinetic Dysarthria Assess Flashcards

1
Q

___ to ___ % of PD patients will dev speech symptoms

A

60-80

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

PD speech symptoms are most commonly perceived (and the ones treated) as…

A

reduced loudness, reduced prosody, fast speech, poor voice quality, and imprecise consonants

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

short rushes and rapid rate are both unique to

A

parkinson’s, special to hypokinetic D

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

harsh and breathy are …

mono/reduced loudness =

A

often co-occuring but not distinctive characs

often why they seek therapy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

one of the most common initial speech symptoms, pts complain that they are …

A

becoming soft spoken (hypophonic, hypophonia) and are becoming frustrated by frequent requests to repeat themselves

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

perception of reduced loudness is diff to evaluate bc

A

perception of reduced loudness is influenced by speaking context and level of background noise

patient may sound like they have adequate loudness in a quiet clinic room but fail to compensate to noisier situations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

formal speech used during evaluations may produced…

A

louder speech than more informal everyday conversational speech (lab or clinic speech)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

may need to evaluate speech in…

A

a variety of speaking situations and under a variety of background noises to determine extent of reduced loudness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

PDs perceived to have lower overall speech loudness than any other

__/15 pts perceived as having loudness decay

A

dysarthric group

13/15

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

PDs had significantly lower speech loudness than ____

PDs had a ___ correlation bw speech loudness and mean speech intensity ….. which means….

what else is involved?

A

HCs

0.82

so low intensity doesn’t completely predict low loudness

PDs have a significantly more spectral tilt and less spectral energy in higher frequencies than HCs

Correction of the spectral tilt improves the correlation between low intensity and low loudness

May need to dev a voice amplifier where spectral tilt can be manipulated

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

PDs have reduced average ____ in conversation and other speech tasks

A

speech intensity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

PD’s have greater than normal ______ across an utterance (only observed in some studies)

A

intensity decay

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what are the 5 possible explanations for reduced speech intensity (hypophonia) in PD?

A

Laryngeal: bowed vocal folds during phonation, reduced adduction and medial compression

Respiratory: reduced vital capacity, reduced subglottal air pressure and restricted range of rib cage movements during speech breathing

Articulation: reduced size of oral movements during speech (i.e. reduced jaw opening)

Flexed posture.

Abnormal perception of self-loudness.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

PDs give ______ ratings for conversations in noise and when talking at a distance

A

low communication effectiveness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

PDs have significant reduction in ______ when talking in noise

A

inteligibility

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

PDs show a ______ response but there is variability across indvs

A

lombard

involuntary vocal response to background noise

17
Q

speech-to-noise level obtained in diff noise conditions may

A

be a useful measure of hypophonia severity

18
Q

perception of abnormal voice quality can often be

may have to be fairly…

A

the only speech symptom

may have to be fairly severe before pt seeks help

19
Q

DAB, 1969;1975: found that w abnormal voice quality…

A

harshness and breathiness common and often co-occurred

66% (21/32) harsh

60% (19/32) breathy

20
Q

Logemann et al, 1973;1978: found for abnormal voice quality

A

perceptual study of 200 PDs

89% had voice disorder (breathy, hoarse, rough, tremor)

45% voice disorder the only speech symptom

21
Q

what are the 3 instrumental data options abnormal voice quality for Hypo D?

A

acoustic perturbation measures (harshness, breathiness)

maximum phonation time

laryngoscopic measures

22
Q

acoustic perturbation measures (harshness, breathiness) reveal..

A

PDs had higher jitter and shimmer values than normals

23
Q

maximum phonation time (for voice quality) reveals

A

MPT reduced (2 studies) or the same (3 studies) as normals

inconsistency may be related to severity of PDs tested or testing procedures (practice effects and # of trials)

24
Q

laryngoscopic measures (for abnormal voice quality) reveals

A

30/32 PDs observed to have ‘bowing’ of the vocal folds during phonation (Hanson, 1984)

26/32 PDs had laryngeal asymmetry during phonation

more posterior & lateral position of one arytenoid

consistently associated with side of symptoms in unilateral PDs (Hanson et al, 1984)

25
Q

perception of reduced prosodic variation can…

has subtle effects on…

speech situation/context/topic may…

A

occur early in disease

has subtle effects on communication so pt may not complain about it initially (ie. people think pt is depressed, or less interested in conversing with others, may be a less effective speaker in many work and social settings)

speech situation, context and topic may have significant influence on evaluation of prosody

26
Q

darley et al (for reduced prosodic variation) found that

A

monopitch (31/32 PDs), monoloudness (32/32) & reduced stress (32/32) perceived as most deviant and distinctive dimensions

27
Q

what are the two instrumental measures for perception of reduced prosodic variation?

A
  • reduced pitch and loudness variability in sentences (SD of F0)
  • lack of pitch declination across sentences (Slope of F0)
28
Q

speech rate can be either…

A

abnormally fast or slow in PD

29
Q

___% of 200s PDs had abnormal rate: ___% slow and ___% fast

A

20% of 200 PDs had abnormal rate: 9% slow 11% fast

30
Q

rapid speech occurs in about ___% of PDs

A

rapid speech occurs in about 10% of PDs (6-13% across studies)

31
Q

Darley 1975 found that ___% of PDs had intermittent short rushes of speech

32
Q

what are the 2 instrumental data evidence that is available for perception of abnormal speech rate? what do they show?

A

diadichokinetics
- PDs /p,t,k/ rates are no different from normals (Kruel, 1972; Ludlow et al, 1987)

  • Kent et al 2022 reviewed recent DDK studies in PD and found many studies have reported slower and more variable DDKs especially for /k/.

utterance durations
- selected individual PDs (approx. 10% of group) found to have abnormally short utterance durations (Adams, 1994; Metter & Hanson, 1983)

33
Q

perception of imprecise consonants: darley 1975 found that

A

32/32 had imprecise consonants, 25/32 had reduced intelligibility ALS, spastic, and dystonia more severe than PDs

34
Q

perception of imprecise consonants: Logemann et al 1978 found that

A

phonetic transcriptions of 90 PDs

inadequate vocal tract closure during stops, affricates and fricatives eg. stops and affricates became more fricative like (spirantized), fricatives reduced in frication noise

35
Q

what are the 3 pieces of instrumental data that was found for perception of imprecise consonants?

A

1) Abnormal amount of spirantization of stops (Weismer, 1984b)

2) Frequent and abnormal amount of voicing into stop closures

(Weismer, 1984b)

3) reduced range/amplitude of lip, tongue and jaw movements during speech

(Forrest et al, 1989; Connor et al, 1989) – causal link to spirantization ?

36
Q

what are the 5 perceptual and instrumental aspects of speech symptoms in PD?

A

perception of reduced loudness

perception of abnormal voice quality

perception of reduced prosodic variation

perception of abnormal rate of speech

perception of imprecise consonants