L11 Transformation in Mouse Flashcards
Transformation in mouse
Initial experiments - microinject DNA directly into the embryo, very inefficient
Major advance - development of ES cell cultures
Embryonic stem (ES) cells:
- can be maintained in culture
- form colonies (unlike most animal cells)
- remain in undifferentiated states
- but pluripotent => retain the ability to differentiate into different cell types
Transformation of ES cells by electroporation
See onenote diagram
- to get DNA into any cell
- strong electric pulse opens the cell membrane pores
- uses a selectable marker e.g. neomycin resistance
- fate of DNA = must be integrated to be maintained (rate or non-homologous integration much greater than homologous integration)
Micro-injection of ES cells into blastocyst
See onenote
- ES clones from brown mouse inserted into blastocyst of white mouse
- injected into blastocyst of a white mouse
- implanted into pseudo pregnant female
Selecting transgenic mice
See onenote slide
- implant embryo into pseudo pregnant female
- chimera = successful integration, brown patches derived from ES cells, evidence that it has been transformed with DNA
Gene transfer in the mouse - summary
- labour intensive and low frequency
- DNA must be integrated to be maintained
- frequency of non-homologous integration much greater than homologous integration
Targeted disruption of HPRT gene in mice
See onenote
- knockout mice
- selection for homologous recombination possible but two caveats:
1. hprt- have a selectable phenotype in ES cells
2. hprt gene is x-linked, used male ES cell lines
Generalised strategy for gene targeting in ES cells
See onenote
Positive-negative selection
- increases identification of homologous integration
Positive = select for transformants e.g. NeoR (G418)
Negative = select against non-homologous integration events e.g. HSV-TK (herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase) (GANCs, GANC sensitive)
p53 gene
- role in cell cycle
- alteration to p53 gene associated with many cancers
- due to loss-of-function mutations? over-expression/ altered function? null mutation?
Targeted knockout of p53 in mouse
See onenote slides
If P53 is an essential gene, there should be a distortion in the Mendelian ratio BUT 1:2:1 is normal => p53 is not an essential gene
p53null/p53null viable and developed normally - dispensable to development BUT…
- dramatically increased frequency of cancer so loss of p53 => malignancy
- suggests p53 has a protective role, recognised as a tumour suppressor
Role of p53
- p53 protein similar to known transcription factors
- does p53 activate expression of genes that prevent cancer or does p53 repress expression of genes that cause cancer?
- use yeast determine whether p53 can function as an activator of gene expression
GAL4 TF
- regulates galactose breakdown in yeast
- GAL4 has a DNA binding domain and an activation domain, the two domains can be separated
Is p53 an activator?
See onenote slides
- replace GAL4 activating domain with p53, the DNA binding domain of GAL4 stays the same
- will p53 activate expression of reporter gene, lacZ?
- transformed into yeast
- expression occurs, p53 has activator function in yeast
- p53 known as “guardian of the genome”, a TF factor that activates DNA repair
Mouse transformation summary
See onenote summary page
Various strategies developed to expand the possibilities available in the mouse
- Knock in - gene of interest expressed in place of target
- Cre/loxP - to introduce specific mutations, inducible
- double replacement - creating clean mutations
Generating knock-in
See onenote slide
e.g. put reporter into locus of gene to understand its expression