L10 - Classic Theories Flashcards
What is the difference between contiguity and contingency learning?
Contiguity: Stimulus-response and stimulus-stimulus associations
Contingency: Causal relationship between behaviour and outcomes
What are the 4 key principles/debates occurring in learning theory?
Contiguity v Contingency
Drive Reduction v No Drive Reduction
Cognitions v No Cognitions
Learning v Performance (can learning occur without reward?)
What type of theory did Thorndike believe in?
Association theory
(S-R bonds or contiguity-based explanation)
(Gradual learning process, trial and error learning)
Who invented Stimulus-Response Theory?
Edward Thorndike
What does ‘instrumental conditioning’ in Stimulus-Response Theory mean?
Consequences bind or connect responses to stimuli through association.
(Similar to contingency learning, but learning is done instead by association)
What were Thorndike’s 3 elementary behavioural laws?
- The ‘law of effect’
- The ‘law of readiness’
- The ‘law of exercise’
Describe Thorndike’s ‘law of effect’
Any response that successfully influences the environment will have a greater probability of being repeated in the same situation.
(i. e. animal learns what response ‘works’ given a particular situation)
* (this is the only law that stuck)*
Describe Thorndike’s ‘law of readiness’
Animals perform or repeat actions which are satisfying and avoid those which cause annoyance or discomfort.
Describe Thorndike’s ‘law of exercise’
The connection between responses and outcomes becomes stronger over time.
(i.e. more dominant responses should come to dominate if the animal is repeatedly placed into the same situation)
Which of Thorndike’s laws were abandoned?
The ‘law of readiness’ and the ‘law of exercise’
What was Thorndike’s notion of ‘multiple response’
Animals who vary their responses a lot more are more likely to get the correct response
(Similar to Skinner’s notion of creativity)
What was Thorndike’s notion of ‘associative shifting’
Animals responses can be shifted by gradually modifying small elements of the stimulus until it is a completely different one
(Skinner’s notion of ‘fading’ or ‘vanishing’)
What was Thorndike’s ‘response by analogy’?
Animals work out what works in a particular type of situation and then apply it to other similar situations.
(similar to generalisation)
What was Thorndike’s ‘response availability’?
The ability to modify responses in reaction to variations in the environment?
(similar to discrimination learning)
What did Edwin Guthrie believe was wrong with Stimulus Response Theory and what did he believe was the most important thing described in his Contiguity Theory?
- Argued that other theories were too complex
- The only important thing was the contiguity of responses
What sort of theorist was Guthrie?
How did he believe animals learnt?
Contiguity theorist
He thought that animals were ‘robots’ and the strength of learning was related to exposure and spatial-temporal linking of S-R.
Reinforcement cements S-R bonds.
What is the contiguity of responses law in Guthrie’s contiguity theory?
Behavioural responses occurring in conjunction with stimuli will be repeated.
(e.g. hurdle-jump, cigarette-smoke etc.)
How do you change behaviour according to Guthrie’s contiguity theory?
One needs to encourage other behaviours in conjunction with the stimuli.
What are three kinds of treatments or therapies that are based on Guthrie’s principles?
- Exhaustion or Flooding Technique
- Threshold Method and Counter-Conditioning
- Incompatibility Method
- Explain the exhaustion or flooding technique for changing behaviour.
- Why does it work?
- Making the person repeat the response until it is fatigued.
- The stimulus no longer evokes any sort of interest or response. The stimulus and response connection is broken because other responses (e.g. irritation and frustration) start to intrude.
- Explain the threshold method for changing behaviour.
- How does it work
- Involves the gradual exposure of varying magnitudes or thresholds of a stimulus.
- It starts with such a weak version that the person does not respond. The stimulus is gradually increased and hopefully, the person still doesn’t produce a response.
How is counter-conditioning (systematic desensitisation) different from the threshold method?
Similar to the threshold method as you start with a weak stimulus and gradually grow stronger but the effect is strengthened by encouraging competing responses (e.g. relaxation)
Describe the incompatibility method for changing behaviour.
Involves exposing a person to the stimulus in situations where it comes to be associated with other responses.
(e.g. tying a dead bird to the neck of a dog who was chasing birds so that they want to get away from birds rather than chase them)
What determines the strength of learning according to stimulus-response associations.
Conditioning becomes stronger when the behaviour and stimuli are more complex.
(If the person or animal does more, and does it in the context of a richer array of stimuli, then the connection will be stronger.)
(e.g. it’s best to learn in a sequence rather than just an individual task, i.e. its easier to start at the beginning of a song rather than halfway through)