L 11 Classic Theories 2 Flashcards
Which researcher believed learning happened instantaneously?
Gutherie
Which researcher believed that learning was a gradual process?
Thorndike
What was Tolman’s main contribution to the learning literature?
Latent learning
That learning and performance are two different things.
Why is Expectancy a key element of Tolman’s Full Learning Paradigm theory?
While we could experience a stimulus and know appropriate responses if we are not expecting a reward we won’t act out the behaviour
S -> R -> Expectation
In Tolman’s learning paradigm (S-R-E) what is contiguity and what is contingency
Contiguity = S-R
Contingency = R-E
Explain Atkinson’s Expectancy Value Theory
People do things if we are motivated and it’s worth it, but only if we have a high probability of success.
What is the formula for Atkinson’s (1974) Expectancy-Value Theory (EVT)?
P = M x E x I
(response = motive x expectancy x incentive value)
Is intermittent (Skinner) or continuous (Tolman) reinforcement stronger for learning?
Intermittent
What are the 3 main differences between Skinner and Tolman’s theories?
Tolman’s expectancy theory linked to the frequency of reinforcement is wrong, Skinner was right (intermittent)
Skinner’s assumption that you can only learn with rewards is false, Tolman right.
Skinner’s exclusion of cognitions and motivation is wrong (believed learning and performance are the same)
What influences did Tolman’s work have on learning theory?
(4 things)
- Both contiguity and contingency (reward) is important.
- Influenced the development of EV theory.
- Influenced the development of Rotter’s ‘locus of control construct’
- Distinguished learning (S-R) from performance (R-E)
What did Clark Hull believe was the key element for learning?
Learning is due to motivation states (drives) and drive reduction was the key element.
(Animals learn because they have a food drive, sex drive etc.)
Did Hull believe in both contingency and contiguity (separation of learning and performance)?
Yes
(similar to Tolman)
What did Hull believe learning was?
Learning has a purpose.
The purpose is finding the appropriate response in a given stimulus condition/situation that reduces drives.
Hull was not a radical behaviourist like Thorndike, Guthrie or Skinner. He included ____ in his theory
intervening variables
Hull believed in what type of learning relationship?
S-s-R
S = learned first
this S knowledge is internalised neurologically as a trace (s)
which then gives rise to R (the motor response)
How is Hull’s S-s-R relationship different to Skinner?
Skinner did not postulate about this sort of internal or intervening process
What was Hull’s theory in a nutshell?
Learning occurs when animals associate S-R (contiguity)
but this is activated to reduce drives (e.g., hunger)
Strength of the S-R association = habit strength
habit strength x drive strength = reaction potential
What is habit strength?
How strong the response and stimulus are connected (how must you associate the stimulus with the response)
What is the reaction potential according to Hull?
The strength of responding
When they really know the response (habit strength) and the drive strength is really strong
The key element of Hull’s theory is?
drive reduction
(animals work to reduce their drives)
sHr in Hull’s theory refers to?
Habit strength
What is conditioned inhibition?
If you have a habit that you enjoy, but then you start to no longer enjoy it, the reinforcement will be inhibited and you will no longer want to engage in that behaviour.
(go to a restaurant for years, then all of a sudden the food quality becomes poor)
What is incentive value in Hull’s system?
How good quality the reward is
Name the factors in Hull’s full system.
What does stimulus intensity dynamism refer to in Hull’s full system?
The intensity of the stimulus influences learning
(react more strongly to a stronger stimulus)
What does variability or oscillation mean?
You might have a behaviour that is strongly rehearsed but some days it will not be as good (variation in response)
What went wrong with Hull’s theory?
Drive’s can’t explain all behaviour. The drive element isn’t necessary for behaviour
- Animals engage in a lot play and exploration behaviour.*
- These do not seem to involve reinforcement?*