L01 - Deductive Argument Flashcards

1
Q

Affirming the Consequent

A

An invalid argument in the form ‘If P then Q (premise 1). Q (premise 2). Therefore, P (conclusion)’. This invalid form is often confused with the valid form Modus Ponens.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Antecedent

A

In a conditional that has the form ‘If P, then Q’ (or ‘If P, Q’), P is the antecedent.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Assertion (or Statement)

A

Either the act of advancing a sentence as true or the product of that act.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Conditional

A

A complex sentence of the form ‘If P, Q’ or ‘Q if P’. It involves two elements: P is the antecedent, and Q is the consequent.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Conjunctive Statement (Conjunction)

A

A complex statement consisting of two sentences (conjuncts) that are joined by a conjunction, such as ‘and’ or ‘but’.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Consequent

A

In a conditional that has the form ‘If P then Q’, Q is the consequent.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Constructive Dilemma

A

Deductively valid argument form of the following variety:

(1) P or Q
(2) If P then R
(3) If Q then S
Therefore,
(4) R or S

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Disjunctive Statement (Disjunction)

A

A complex statement that consists in two sentences that are presented as alternatives.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Disjunctive Syllogism

A

Deductively valid argument form of the following variety:

(1) P or Q
(2) Not Q
Therefore,
(3) P

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Hypothetical Syllogism

A

Deductively valid argument form of the following variety:

(1) If P then Q
(2) If Q then R
Therefore,
(3) If P then R

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Modus Ponens

A

Deductively valid argument form of the following variety:

(1) If P, then Q
(2) P
Therefore,
(3) Q

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Modus Tollens

A

Deductively valid argument form of the following variety:

(1) If P, then Q
(2) Not Q
Therefore
(3) Not P

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Necessary Condition

A

A condition that must be met for a claim to be true.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Necessary Truth

A

A necessary truth is a claim that is true in all possible scenarios.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Soundness

A

For an argument to be sound is for it to be valid and for all its premises to be true. By definition, a sound argument proves its conclusion.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Truth Conditions

A

The truth conditions of a sentence or claim are the conditions that must be obtained in order for that sentence or claim to be true.

17
Q

Validity

A

For an argument to be valid is for the truth of its premises to guarantee the truth of its conclusion. An argument is valid just in case there is no way for the conclusion to be false if the premises are true. A structural property of arguments.

18
Q

Argument

A

A set of statements (i.e., premises) that purport to support a claim (i.e., the conclusion).

19
Q

Assertion

A

The act of stating something as if it were true.

20
Q

Proposition, statement, sentence, claim.

A

What you say in order to make an assertion.

21
Q

Premise

A

A statement intended to provide rational support for some other statement (a conclusion), often in conjunction with other premises.

22
Q

Conclusion

A

A statement intended to be rationally supported by a set of premises.

23
Q

Law of Identity

A

For any proposition P: P if and only if P.

24
Q

Law of Non-Contradiction

A

Not both P and not-P.

25
Q

Law of Excluded Middle

A

P or not-P.

26
Q

Intuitionistic Logic

A

Does not include Law of Excluded Middle.

27
Q

Dialetheic Logic

A

Does not include Law of Non-Contradiction.

28
Q

Modal Logics

A

Introduces complications such as belief, knowledge, obligation, possibility, and temporality.

29
Q

Linked Arguments

A

Premises tie together to support a single overall conclusion.

30
Q

Convergent Arguments

A

A range of independent grounds for a conclusion are assembled together as premises. No premise in a convergent argument requires the other premises in order to support the conclusion; rather, each premise directly supports the conclusion.

31
Q

Sequential Arguments

A

Cases in which premises establish intermediate conclusions, which then serve as premises for some further conclusion.