Knowledge of God's existance Flashcards

1
Q

Who argues that we have an innate sense of God

A

Calvin

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the sensus divinitatis

A

seed of religion, an innate sence of God and natural human incliantion to carry out religious practises `

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What does calvin state about desire for God

A

“God is written in the Human Heart”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

How can the claim that knowledge of God is natural

A
  • The unknown God, Pual convinces the Greeks that they are worshipping the true God altar of unknown God
  • Universal consent arguement - Cicero beleives that if man people believe, then it must exist (FLAWED ARGUEMENT)
  • Humans are religious beings
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

How does Natural law link to knowledge of God

A

Natural law rests of supposition that all humans have an innate sense of goodness, fairness and justice however ill formed those views might be. Small children, for example, quickly develop a strong sense of fairness and justice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

How does conscience law link to Knowledge of God

A

Conscience is joint knowledge between ourselves and Argued that conscience is our God given faculty as creatures made in the image of God. As such our moral choice making responds to Gods will.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is Paley’s design argument (PURPOSE)

A

Analogy with the watch, watch is purposeful and functional, cogs etc. We know this watch has been created by a watch maker. Similar to how world is intrinsically designed there must be a God.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are objections to the design argument

A

Nature is more brutal than beautiful
Means God is also cruel, goes aginast God of faith and qualities
Darwin’s notion of evolution by natural evolution by natural selection, no longer widly accepted that the world is purposeful, nature has no final cause but just wants to survive
Natrue without purpsoe makes God redundant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are the suggested scholarly views of this topic

A
  • Romans 1:18–21
    The wrath of God is being revealed from heaven against all the godlessness and wickedness of people, who suppress the truth by their wickedness,
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

How is God revealed through Faith

A

Through
Aquinas unformed faith: faith which may find intellectual reasons why, a person may find afterlife is possible but cannot accept it is true. Devils believed in God but did not trust to save them
Formed Faith: Faith which wills to accept what it can believe through. E.g faith is willing to believe that the evidence of those who witnessed Jesus resurrection

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is Calvin’s Protestant teaching about faith?

A

Firm and certain knowledge: only revealed by Christ

Willingness to believe: Faith is given to anyone who is willing to accept it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

How can Jesus reveal God

A
  • Christ is the image or likeness of the invisible God
  • God became a human being because he accommodates himself to our actual physical and mental condition
  • Calvin describes Christ as the mirror and mediator of the divine
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What was the Barth Brunner debate

A

a debate focused on Calvin by Brunner and Barth

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What did Brunner argue

A

that Calvin’s notion that God’s general revelation in nature as a point of contact is insufficient to achieve redemption which is revealed through Christ.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What were Brunners views

A
  • Imago Dei, the image of God in humans after fall had been destroyed
  • General revelation, God communicates through nature which reflects his nature, but as humans are blinded they do not receive this as grace just as a sign
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What was Barths reply to Brunner

A

Human nature is completely corrupted by the fall and that there are no points of contact in nature of any kind which would allow humans to know.

17
Q

What were Barths views (3)

A

Formal self cannot inform the material self of God’s existence. Barth different from animals but fall has blocked out ability to know God

No points of contact. Nature conscience and guilt do not provide anything with God

Order of creation. Barth argues that although we are able to perceive order in nature it is not the basis for morality or salvation.

18
Q

What does Alvin Plantinga believe

A

Begins with notion that God can be held along with other basic beliefs.

Weaker sensus divinitatis where there is general sense to make reasonable basic religious claims

Rejects natural theology

19
Q

What is natural theology

A

theology that provides arguments for the existence of God based on reason and ordinary experience of nature

20
Q

Criticsm of Plantinga

A
  • Knowledge of God is not basic, millions of people have had sense of God chance they could have just
    not interpreitated fully
  • Plantinga assuemes that Christian beleifs such as holy spirit is true, no reason to expalin why bible is not enough
21
Q

Brunner on natural world

A

Natural world provides general knowledge of God but not sufficeint for salvation

22
Q

How does the bible support Calvin’s view

A

Bible: supports idea that people are born with a sense for God e.g. Genesis God breathes into Adam with his own breath. We are made in the image of God and so can appreciate beauty and goodness in the world which are manifestations of God’s goodness and creativity.

23
Q

Dawkins on faith

A

Dawkins: faith encourages people to be lazy in their thinking. Where there is a gap in human knowledge it is described as a mystery and that evidence is not necessary.