Knowledge - Key Concepts Flashcards

1
Q

The branch of philosophy that addresses questions like: ‘What is knowledge?’, ‘How can we justify our claims to knowledge?’, ‘What can we know?’

A

Epistemology

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

The branch of epistemology that draws on work in evolutionary science in order better understand human beings as agents capable of knowledge.

A

Evolutionary Epistemology

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

The view that knowledge about a certain kind of thing is impossible. One can be a skeptic about different things. For instance, one might be skeptic about morality, but not about the external world (or vice versa), or one could be a skeptic about what can be known through perception and reason, but not about one’s own existence.

A

Skepticism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

The view that most or all of what we know is derived from reason rather than inferred from experience. In other words, rationalists hold that (most) knowledge is justified a priori rather than a posteriori. Like empiricists, rationalists are foundationalists; but foundationalists who hold that the basic building blocks of thought and reason are innate concepts, ideas, or principles.

A

Rationalism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

The view that most or all of what we know is inferred or generalized from experience rather than derived from reason. In other words, empiricists hold that (most) knowledge is justified a posteriori rather than a priori. Like rationalists, empiricists are foundationalists; but foundationalists who hold that the basic building blocks of thought and reason are concepts, ideas, or principles that must be learned from either sensory or introspective experience.

A

Empiricism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

The view that all knowledge is either part of some basic or foundational class of beliefs or is something that can be justifiably inferred from those beliefs.

A

Foundationalism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

The view that if a declarative sentence is meaningful, then there must be ways to verify or falsify it.

A

Verificationism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

The view that the justification condition for knowledge states that a belief is justified only if it is caused in the right sort of way.

A

Casual Theories of Knowledge

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

The view that “knowledge is true belief produced by a means that is reliable [i.e. objectively truth-tracking] in the circumstances” (70).

A

Reliabilism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

The view that justification depends only on what’s internal to a believer’s mind. The traditional accounts of justification, rationalism and empiricism, are both versions of internalism.

A

Internalism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

The view that justification depends in part on things that are external to a believer’s mind.

A

Externalism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

The view that philosophical inquiry should be largely continuous with scientific inquiry.

A

Naturalism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

The philosophical technique of asking questions in order to lead someone to discover the answers themselves.

A

The Socratic Method

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Any set of sentences which can all be true at the same time are consistent, two or more sentences that cannot all be true are inconsistent.

A

Consistent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

According to the traditional account knowledge is justified true belief. In other words, to know something: (i) you must believe it, (ii) it must be true, and (iii) you must be justified in believing it.

A

Knowledge

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

One of the necessary condition for knowledge. As discussed in Plato’s Theaetetus, this condition is necessary for distinguishing real knowledge from accidentally arrived at true belief.

A

Justification Condition

17
Q

Evidence consistent with the falsity of the sentence or claim it supports.

A

Defeasible Evidence

18
Q

Evidence that provides certainty, i.e. is so good that its truth is inconsistent with the falsity of the sentence or claim it supports.

A

Indefeasible Evidence

19
Q

“For any two sentences, A and B, if you know A and know B, and if from A and B, together, C follows logically, then if you believe C, you know C” (49).

A

Deductive Closure Principle

20
Q

“If you take any two sentences, A and B, then, if you are justified in believing both A and B, and if from A and B together, C follows logically, then, if you believe C, you are justified in believing C” (50).

A

Principle of Deduction for Justification (PDJ)

21
Q

The kind of justification one has when something can be known by reason alone.

A

a priori

22
Q

The kind of justification one has when something requires more than reason to discover.

A

a posteriori

23
Q

An adjective that applies to any sentence or claim about what people ought to do, say, or believe, or what should take place.

A

Prescriptive

24
Q

An adjective that applies to any sentence or claim that describes what is the case and can be true or false.

A

Descriptive