Key Thinkers Flashcards
(49 cards)
Thomas Hobbes (1588 - 1679)
key information
arguably the most celebrated English political philosopher, Hobbes made very important contributions to conservative thought and shaped the belief in human imperfection
key ideas…
human nature
authority
the state (strong state)
Thomas Hobbes (1588 - 1679)
views on society
an ordered society should balance the human need to lead a free life
freedom without order and authority would have disastrous consequences for human society – comes from his ideas on human nature
Thomas Hobbes (1588 - 1679)
views on society and human nature: state of nature
created a hypothetical situation known as the ‘state of nature’ where people were equal and free and did not have to answer to any form of higher authority
he argued that under such circumstances, humans would exhibit a “restless desire” for power, which would lead to conflict and a “war of every man against every man”
in other words, a state of nature would become a state of war and life would become “solitary, poor, nasty, brutish and short”
in order to avoid “a war of all against all”, Hobbes argued that a Leviathan authority figure is needed (a strong leader)
Thomas Hobbes (1588 - 1679)
views on the state: what is government established from?
government is established from the consent of the people – the people grant power to those governing and authorise them to do everything necessary to preserve order and peace, they submit to the absolute authority of the state
Thomas Hobbes (1588 - 1679)
views on the state: why is there a need for authority and a strong state?
there is a need for political authority and a strong government because humans are vulnerable, imperfect and easily led astray – they require guidance in the form of a state
government is required to restrict the negative sides of human nature, without government we will resort to our basic violent instincts - which he described through the ‘state of nature’
Thomas Hobbes (1588 - 1679)
views on the state: what did he argue for in Leviathan?
in Leviathan (1651), his most famous work, he argued for almost total obedience to absolute government – the only alternative to obedience and absolute government is chaos
Hobbes used the term ‘leviathan’ to refer to an absolute government which represents a “common power to keep them all in awe”
Thomas Hobbes (1588 - 1679)
views on the state: key quote
“How could a state be governed or protected… if every individual remained free to obey or not to obey the law according to his private opinion?”
Thomas Hobbes (1588 - 1679)
views on human nature: humans are fearful and self interested
people are fearful and self-interested – they will choose to sacrifice many of their rights and freedoms in return for order and security
they will enter into a social contract to establish political authority and surrender most of their natural rights (except the right to self-defence) to the individual or group to whom they defer authority
Thomas Hobbes (1588 - 1679)
views on human nature: human vulnerability and the need for a strong state
humans are vulnerable, imperfect and easily led astray
they require guidance in the form of a state, so there is a need for political authority and a strong government to prevent the negative sides of human nature (without a strong state we will resort to our basic violent instincts)
people will compete violently to obtain basic necessities and other material gains, they will challenge others and fight out of fear in order to ensure their personal safety
the best humans hope for is a peaceful life under strong government to guarantee order and security, the alternative to strong government is to accept the “natural condition of mankind” with its violence, insecurity and constant threats
Thomas Hobbes (1588 - 1679)
views on human nature: what do humans seek?
humans seek reputation, both for its own sake and so others will be too afraid to challenge them
Thomas Hobbes (1588 - 1679)
views on human nature: intellectual imperfection
the human capacity to reason is fragile, people’s attempts to understand the world around them tend to be distorted by self-interest and concerns of the moment
we are easily led astray by such attempts to understand the world
Edmund Burke (1729 - 97)
key information
Irish born politician and writer, commonly regarded as a founder of modern conservatism and closely associated with traditional conservatism
Reflections on the Revolution in France (1790) is his most well known work in which he criticised the Frech Revolution and developed a number of key conservative values
key ideas.... organic society tradition change the state
Edmund Burke (1729 - 97)
views on change: what must change be?
change must be undertaken with great caution and consideration must be given to the delicate balance inherent in an organic society
the state and society must only be changed when necessary, and if change is necessary, it should be achieved through gradual and incremental reform in order to preserve stability and social harmony – revolution should be avoided at all costs
reform should be limited, cautious and based on empiricism, it must always take the past and tradition into account
Edmund Burke (1729 - 97)
views on change: what is the problem with revolutionary change?
drastic change can only end in chaos and tyranny – abstract principles have not stood the test of time whereas traditional institutions have, they are known to work and should not be changed
revolutionary change cuts off society’s ‘roots’ (aka institutions and customs) and leads to complete social and political breakdown
Edmund Burke (1729 - 97)
views on change: key quote
“It is with infinite caution that any man ought to venture upon pulling down an edifice which has answered in any tolerable degree for ages the common purposes of society”
Edmund Burke (1729 - 97)
views on tradition: what was his main problem with the French Revolution?
his main problem with the French Revolution was that it represented an attempt to create a new society and system of government based on abstract principles (such as liberty and equality) and dismissed the lessons of the past
links to human nature being intellectually imperfect so we should not rely on abstract ideas
Edmund Burke (1729 - 97)
views on tradition: respect for tradition
tradition and empiricism (the idea that knowledge comes from real experience and not from abstract theories) should be respected because they come from practices passed down from one generation to the next
heavy emphasis of tradition as it represents the accumulated wisdom of the past, our long standing institutions, customs and practices have stood the test of time so should be respected and upheld
respect for tradition promotes social continuity and stability, establishes an obligation or duty for each generation to protect and pass on the accumulated wisdom of tradition to the next generation, provides society and the individual with a strong sense of historical and national identity
Edmund Burke (1729 - 97)
views on tradition: key quote
“We procure reverence to our civil institutions on the principle which Nature teaches us to revere individual men: on account of their age and on account of those from whom they are descended”
Edmund Burke (1729 - 97)
views on the state
the state resembles a living organism – so change should be organic and gradual
Michael Oakeshott (1901 - 90)
key information
British political philosopher who made a significant contribution to conservative thinking on human imperfection and pragmatism
famous works - Rationalism in Politics (1962), On Human Conduct (1975)
key ideas... pragmatism society human imperfection tradition
Michael Oakeshott (1901 - 90)
views on pragmatism: why should we be guided by pragmatism?
people’s thoughts and actions should be guided by pragmatism rather than ideology, this is because theories and ideologies oversimplify complex situations
any attempts to make sense of society via ideology distorts and simplifies the facts
this links to the idea of human imperfection, we are intellectually imperfect and do not have the mental capabilities to make sense of such a complex modern world
Michael Oakeshott (1901 - 90)
views on pragmatism: what do political leaders do?
political leaders instinctively act on the “authority of their own reason” rather than practical experience, it is dangerous to believe that leaders (or any human) can fully understand society and know how it should be changed
the brutal fascist and communist regimes of the 20th century are clear examples of the dangers of relying on ideology and theory, they show the misguided human rationalism
humans should not seek to perfect society based on ideology, it will only lead to chaos and harmful destruction
Michael Oakeshott (1901 - 90)
views on pragmatism: pragmatism in Britain
British parliamentary government has developed pragmatically over time, it has not followed a rationalist or ideological path
it has existed for centuries and governs on the basis of history and experience
Michael Oakeshott (1901 - 90)
views on pragmatism: the importance of pragmatism
pragmatism will deliver what is in the best interests of the people without overstepping the limits of public acceptance – this is because it involves learning from past experience and understanding what works best
it will maintain social stability and cohesion by emphasising moderation, cautious change only where necessary and a sense of historical continuity – this will prevent revolution and the destruction of society
it is flexible, reflecting the complex and shifting social realities – unlike rigid theories and ideologies which encourage dogmatic decision making