Key Study Lovvall Et Al Flashcards
What is the main aim of the study?
To compare telephone treatment versus face-to-face treatment for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD)
The study is referred to as a non-inferiority trial.
What hypothesis is being tested in the study?
The hypothesis that telephone ERP is not less effective than face-to-face ERP
Both modes of delivery are expected to result in similar outcomes.
What type of trial is this study classified as?
Randomised control trial
It includes quantitative data collected through self-report questionnaires.
What questionnaires were used in the study?
Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Scale (Y-BOCS), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), and a client satisfaction questionnaire
The Y-BOCS is a ten-item checklist to assess compulsive behavior.
What was the age range of participants in the study?
16-65 years
Participants were an opportunity sample of 72 people with OCD.
What were the eligibility criteria for participants?
Participants must have scored at least 16 on the Y-BOCS and be diagnosed with OCD
Exclusions included comorbid substance misuse, suicidality, or recent medication for depression/anxiety.
How were participants allocated to treatment groups?
Randomly allocated to face-to-face or telephone treatment
Each group consisted of 36 participants.
What is the total number of sessions for the face-to-face group?
Ten one-hour sessions
Sessions involved one-to-one interaction with the therapist.
What was the structure of the telephone treatment?
Two one-hour face-to-face sessions and eight weekly telephone calls lasting up to 30 minutes each
The first and last sessions were face-to-face.
What was the purpose of the initial face-to-face session?
To explain treatment and reduce anxiety/fear through gradual exposure
The session covered the same material as the control group.
What homework expectations were set for participants?
Weekly homework targets were agreed upon, with a suggested time of one hour per day
Homework record sheets were used to monitor progress.
How was progress monitored during the study?
Therapists monitored progress and assisted with target-setting and problem solving
Patients were encouraged to seek help from relatives or friends.
True or False: The therapists delivering the treatments were untrained.
False
The therapists were experienced and trained.
What was the outcome regarding obsessive-compulsive symptoms between the two treatment groups?
There was no significant difference in the severity of obsessive-compulsive symptoms between the two treatment groups at baseline or follow-up assessments.
What slight difference was noted between the two modes of delivery?
The telephone group had slightly higher depression scores at baseline compared to the face-to-face group.
What criterion defined treatment success in the study?
Treatment was seen as successful if an individual’s symptoms decreased by two standard deviations or more from the baseline mean.
What percentage of the telephone group was treated successfully using exposure and response prevention?
77 percent of the telephone group.
What percentage of the face-to-face group was treated successfully?
67 percent of the face-to-face group.
How much did OCD and depression symptoms drop in both groups?
Both OCD and depression symptoms dropped twice as much as would have been necessary to support the hypothesis that telephone therapy was no less effective than face-to-face therapy.
What was the mean Y-BOCS score for the face-to-face group at baseline visit 1?
25.5.
What was the mean BDI score for the telephone group immediately after treatment?
11.2.
What was a methodological strength of the study?
The researchers took two baseline measures using the Y-BOCS and the BDI, showing minimal change in symptoms over four weeks.
What does a minimal difference in baseline tests suggest about the study’s findings?
It suggests that the reduction in symptoms was unlikely due to spontaneous recovery.
What was a weakness of the study regarding participant blinding?
The blinding procedure broke down for some participants, compromising the validity of the data.