Key Rule 2 Flashcards
Key rule 2:
Which metrics and multiples do you use?
Dependent on industry and what stage of growth company is in
- generally use a revenue multiple, to measure value relative to net sales
- also use profitability multiple to assess value relative to profits.
P/E =
Price per share/ EPS
Or
Equity value/ Net income
EBIT =
Company’s operating income from its IS, includes DnA and perhaps other non-cash charges
Unlevered free cash flow (free cash flow to firm)
EBIT x (1-tax rate) + non-cash charges - change in operating assets and liabilities - CapEx
Levered Free Cash Flow (Free Cash Flow to Equity) =
Net income + non-cash charges - change in operating assets and liabilities - CapEx - mandatory Debt repayments
Enterprise value/ EBIT
- used for?
- what does it mean?
- used for many, mostly where CapEx is more important to factor in, since DnA follows CapEx closely
- rough approx of how valuable a company is relative to its income from business operations
Enterprise Value/ EBITDA
- used for?
- what does it mean?
- used for many, most useful where CapEx and D&A not as important, as it excludes both
- rough approx of how valuable a company is relative to its operational cash flow
P/E
- used for?
- what does it mean?
- used for many, most relevant for banks and financial institutions, distorted by non-cash charges, capital structure and tax rates
- rough measure of how valuable a company is in proportion to its after-tax earnings
EV / Levered FCF
- used for?
- what does it mean?
- not very common as it requires lot of work to calculate and may produce wildly different numbers depending on the capital structure
- most accurate measure of a company’s true cash flow and how valuable it is relative to that.
Enterprise Value/ Unlevered FCF
- used for?
- what does it mean?
- used when CapEx or changes in operational assets and liabilities such as deferred revenue have big impact, also critical in DCFs
- similar, but capital structure neutral, so better for comparing different companies
FCF multiples are more accurate than the EBIT and EBITDA multiples, but 2 problems:
- they take more time to calculate, and you have to go through company’s financial statements in detail
- may not be standardised, because companies include very different items in the CFO
Thats why EBIT and EBITDA multiples tend to be more common: convenience and comparability
Are book value multiples any good?
- how valuable a company is relative to its BS
- have become less relevant over time as most company’s EV are vastly different from SE on their BS due to companies over time becoming more service-oriented and intellectuals property oriented.