Key Arguments for Failure of the League of Nations - Conflict and Tension Flashcards
1
Q
the main four reasons for failure of the League
A
- actions of Britain and France
- the membership of the League
- the failure of sanctions
- organisation of the League
2
Q
actions of Britain and France in general
A
- were selfish
- put themselves first
- their relationship was not strong - they kept falling out over how Germany was being treated
3
Q
actions of Britain and France in Manchuria
A
- were reluctant to get involved in a conflict on the other side of the world
- to some extent Japan as ‘restoring order’ in Manchuria
- Britain sent Lord Lytton but he was too slow in writing his report allowing Japan to complete their invasion
4
Q
action of Britain and France in Abyssinia
A
- refused to take strong action against Mussolini in case he sided with Hitler
- ended up ‘appeasing’ Italy instead (for example the Hoare Laval Pact)
- refused to close the Suez Canal
- both had huge African empires so couldn’t really object to Italy aspiring to do the same
5
Q
the membership of the League in general
A
- never had all major nations in the League at the same time
- Russia and the USA was missing from the start
- whenever a ‘bully’ in the League was confronted they simply left, making effective action difficult
6
Q
the membership of the League in Manchuria
A
- Russia was missing at this time
- as the closest nation to Japan they could have applied pressure on them to stop
- sanctions would have been more effective
- USA was one of Japan’s main trading partner
7
Q
the membership of the League in Abyssinia
A
- the absence of the USA made economic sanctions less effective and made Britain and France less likely to push for further sanctions
8
Q
the failure of sanctions in general
A
- depended on the goodwill of all nations
- this worked in the 1920s but not in the 1930s when nations were suffering from the Depression
9
Q
the failure of sanctions in Manchuria
A
- Britain was unwilling to risk its trade with Japan by imposing economic sanctions
- other members refused to ban arms sales in case Japan retaliated
- others felt there was no point as the USA (not a LoN member) was Japan’s main trading partner anyway
10
Q
the failure of sanctions in Abyssinia
A
- Italy could still trade with USA and this meant that Britain and France unwilling to impose economic sanctions
- Britain and France didn’t want to upset Mussolini in case he allied with Hitler
- when sanctions ere eventually imposed, they did not ban trade in coal, steel or oil needed to attack
11
Q
organisation of the League in general
A
- was flawed from the start
- no army
- needed everyone to work together for collective security to work
- too much dependence on permanent members of council
- too easy to leave
- weaknesses showed as soon as bigger members became aggressive
12
Q
organisation of the League in Manchuria
A
- when Japan ignored the League’s warnings, the lack of the LoN army meant there was nothing it could do if Britain and France didn’t want to act
13
Q
organisation of the League in Abyssinia
A
- the permanent members of the Council were unwilling and unable to act
- the Abyssinians pleaded to the Assembly but it was powerless to do anything
- lack of a LoN army (and the ban on weapons sales) left the Abyssinians defenceless