kantian ethics Flashcards
Kant was fascinated by the sense of a moral will. Explain this
-he said he was filled with awe at ‘the starry heavens above and the moral law within’. He believes this will be an a priori moral will (our sense of ought)
kants theory is…
absolutist- absolute moral laws which exist in the noumenal, world.
we access absolute moral laws by using reason
what is the hypothetical imperative and why did Kant dismiss this ?
- hypothetical imperative= where we base a moral decision on an intended outcome. E.g. if I want my friend to be happy then I must lie to her.
- this is not true moral reasoning as we will all reach different conclusions about what is good depending on the circumstances.
- true moral reasoning would reach the same conclusion every time. It must be the same absolute law for everyone
Kant argues for categorical imperatives. What are these?
they must be obeyed and applied to everyone whatever the circumstances
what are the three ways we can test whether our actions are categorical imperatives ?
- can the action be universalised ?
- is it using persons as ends in themselves ?
- are our actions based on how society ought to be, or how it is? we should life as if we belonged to a kingdom of ends (I.e. how it should be)
what is the quote from Kant
‘act only according to that maxim that you will at the same time become universal law’
explain kants lieing promise example
- a man in debt asks to borrow money from a friend, knowing that he cannot pay him back.
- if he universalises this action he realises that society will fall apart as nobody will be able to trust each other’s promises
- he is also using his friend as a means to an end.
- therefore it is the mans duty to tell his friend the truth which can be universalised, and he would recognise that this is how everybody ought to behave.
explain why kants theory is deontological ?
it is our duty to carry out what reason tells us is ‘good’
explain kants example of the axe murderer
- an axe murderer turning up at your door and asking for the whereabouts of your friend.
- it is your duty to tell the truth (as lying can’t be universalised so therefore it is wrong)
- if your friend is murdered you are not morally responsible as you only ever did the right thing.
- however, if you did the wrong thing and lie and then an axe murder comes across your friend because of your life, then u would be morally responsible
explain why duty must be done for dutys sake and no other reason
- doing your duty because you feel sorry for them doesn’t count.
- if we use the example of giving to charity, we might give to a street beggar on one day, but ignore another beggar the next day, depending on our mood.
- if we give because it is our duty to care for those less fortunate, then we will give to beggars whenever we see them, regardless of how we are feeling that day
Kant believed that we live in a ….
fair universe so he argued that there must be a reason for this sense of ought which we all experience
what is the summum bonum
- higher good which is the end product of all of our dutiful good actions.
- this happens in the afterlife
explain the strength of kants ethics being deontological
- love or compassion clouds our judgement
- e.g. a mother refusing to reveal the whereabouts of her son to the police after he has murdered someone- this is because she loves him, but it means that he is free to murder again
- sticking to a principle is better than basing decisions on feelings
explain the weakness of kants ethics being deontological
- acting out of duty is not the way humans behave
- e.g. I must visit my sick grandmother in hospital because I love her; it would be very cold and uncaring of me to visit her simply because it is a duty
explain the strength of kants ethics that it is not consequentialist
- according to Kant the moral value of the action comes from the action itself
- consequentialist theories rely on the belief that if the consequences are good then the action must be good
- but consequences are hard to predict and there are times when the outcome is unexpectedly bad, even though the perpetrator had good intentions
- for Kant, the outcome doesn’t matter
- all that matter is that you did the right thing regardless of consequences