Kantian ethics Flashcards
a goodwill
-the only source of pure good
-one that acts for the sake of duty
-represents the only pure good in the world + is the source of all moral value
is anything that is an end within itself morally good?
no, money and happiness are ends within themselves but are not morally good
a goodwill when it acts for the sake of duty does what?
in willing the action, the motivation doesn’t stem from the outcomes but the duty of doing the right thing
the right thing (goodwill)
to act out of duty not personal motivation = to act in accordance to the moral law
deontological
argues that the rightness or wrongness of an act lies in doing the right thing because it is the right thing in itself – regardless of any consequences
acting put of duty not possible good/bad outcomes for yourself
explain how to act in accordance to duty=acting in accordance to moral law
do the right thing BUT if motives are for yourself it has no moral worth
hypothetical imperatives
things we DON’T always have to do but should to achieve certain goals
-not universally applicable
acting in accordance to duty EX
if a shopkeeper is short changing people for his own benefit =not good
if the shop keeper is not short changing people because he wants a good reputation = NO moral worth as doing for own benefit/avoiding consequences
if the shopkeeper isn’t short-changing people as it the right thing to do = moral worth as acting in accordance to duty not own benefit
hypothetical imperatives EX
if you want a cup of tea you should boil the kettle
-boil the kettle=doing an action for your own gain=NOT morally worthy BUT reaches personal goal
-not universally applicable as not everyone should boil their kettle as not everyone shares the same goal
=not first formulation
categorical imperative
commands we are obliged to follow no matter what
the only MORAL imperatives
categorical imperative EX
you ought to keep your promises
-not dependant on a goal personal or not
-universally applicable
how do you work out categorical imperatives?
asking whether the maxim is universabale and if we are acting out of duty not personal gain/avoiding outcomes
rational commitment
if we genuinely have the desire = the imperative is a sound one we become rationally committed to follow it
rational commitment EX
if you want to lose weight you must eat less and exercise more
your reason will commit you to this
Rational commitment counter argument
doesn’t take weakness of will into account
EX people struggle to lose weight