Kant’s Deontological Ethics Flashcards

1
Q

What is it to be human, that Kant claimed?

A

To be is human, is to have be a ‘rational agent’ (have reason).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What does reason tell us about humans?

A

That we are all equal - we should only act on principles that can be followed by everyone.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is a categorical imperative?

A

Something we should always do, our duty.
It is an unconditional ought.

You should do X.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is a hypothetical imperative?

A

A moral action that a rational will adopts for reasons other than duty, e.g. desire.
It is a conditional ought.

You should do X if you want Y.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What can true morality & duty (universal moral law) not depend on?

A

Our desires - it must be categorical.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What do the three formulations of the categorical imperative serve as criteria for?

A

The rightness/wrongness of an action.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Explain the first formulation of categorical imperative.

A

Universalisability

‘Act only according to that maxim by which you could at the same time will it become a universal law’
- Test of universalisability

This removes consequences & personal feelings from consideration.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Explain the second formulation of categorical imperative.

A

Person as Ends

‘Always treat persons, whether others or in yourself, always as an end, never as a means.’

Meaning, essentially, don’t use people or abuse yourself.
All rational agents (humans) have their own ‘ends’ (goals), & are ends in themselves.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Explain the third formulation of categorical imperative.

A

Kingdom of Ends

Act as if you were making laws for a kingdom that treated persons as ends in themselves.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is Kant’s concept of the Good Will?

A

A Good will is the determination/intention to act in accordance with the moral law, or universal moral law, and without regard to personal gain.

We should do our ‘duty for duty’s sake’.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is a postulate?

A

Something you have to assume to be true in order to have a basis for reasoning about something.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

If ethics is to be based on reason, what are the three postulates we have to assume to be true?

A
  1. God
  2. Immortality (of the soul in an afterlife)
  3. Free will (in order for responsibility)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Why must there be a God in order for there to be justice?

A

Where some good people are not always rewarded in life, there must be a God who lets us into an afterlife where good people are reward with happiness - the summum bonum.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is the summum bonum?

A

The highest good.

Where virtue meets its appropriate reward of perfect happiness.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What does ‘ought implies can’ mean?

A

If something is our duty then we must be capable of doing it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is an example of clashing duties where you cannot do both?

A

A solider who universalises that it’s his duty to stay home & look after his sick mother.

He also universalises that it’s his duty to go to war and fight for his country.

Both are universalisable, and treat persons as ends - both are his duty, but he cannot do both.
Duties are clashing.

17
Q

Kant responded to the problem of clashing duties, what did he distinguish between?

A

Imperfect & perfect duties

Imperfect - multiple ways of fulfilling them.
Perfect - only one way.

It is possible to fulfil both of the soldiers duties because they have multiple options for fulfilment which enables you to choose options that do not clash.

18
Q

What does Kant argue we cannot be responsible for?

A

Consequences, as we cannot control them.

Thus, they cannot be part of our moral equation.

19
Q

If Kant says we can’t be responsible for consequences as we cant control them, what would a consequentialist argue?

A

That even though we can’t completely control them, we should still consider them.

We can control them to a certain degree, shouldn’t we be responsible for them to that degree?

20
Q

What does Bernard Williams claim?

A

That it is ethically wrong & inhuman to suggest moral judgement should be free from emotion.

However, Kant would argue that if the goodness of an action is dependent on feelings, you are failing to act morally.