K Terms Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What is the parol evidence rule (“PER”)? NOTE: NY Distinction

A

PER keeps out evidence of a PRIOR or CONTEMPRANEOUS agreement (either oral OR written) that contradicts a later writing NOTE: a PER problem REQUIRES a writing, so if the fact pattern involves an oral agmt, it’s a SOF problem, NOT a PER problem EXCEPTIONS (where evidence gets in)… 1) to correct a CLERICAL ERROR (e.g. a typo) 2) to establish a DEFENSE against formation (e.g. fraud, duress, mistake, illegality, CONDITION PRECEDENT by extrinsic evidence) 3) to interpret a VAGUE or AMBIGUOUS term (but NOT for a term that has a plain/ordinary meaning) 4) to supplement/add to a PARTIALLY integrated writing (a final stmt of the terms included, but not a COMPLETE stmt of terms agreed to, e.g. a lease for the ballroom that says nothing abt bridal suite) NOTE: if there is a “merger clause” then this strengthens the PRESUMPTION that agmt is complete but is not conclusive NOTE: the PER has NOTHING to do w/ what happens AFTER an agmt is reduced to writing; so such info MAY NOT be kept out [this is a modification, so there may be a consideration or a SOF issue (if oral)]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

How is conduct relevant to K interpretation?

A

Conduct can… 1) Explain words in the K 2) Fill gaps in the K Order of importance of conduct: 1) Course of performance: what parties have done under THIS K; this is the BEST evidence 2) Course of dealing: what these parties have done under PRIOR Ks with each other 3) Usage of trade (custom): what is the custom in the INDUSTRY in similar Ks; this is the furthest removed from the K

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

In the sale of goods (Art. 2/UCC), what are the 3 types of seller warranties?

A

1) Express warranty: a seller is LIABLE for breach of an express warranty, which can be created by… (i) stmts of fact; (ii) promises; (iii) description of the goods; (iv) use of a sample or model product (i.e. you DON’T have to use the word “warranty”) BUT NOT opinions/general subjective stmts (e.g. “all our products are top quality”) NOTE: art appraisals = opinion too In order for stmt to = an express warranty, it must be a “basis of the bargain” (i.e. if the buyer COULD have relied on the stmt) 2) Implied warranty: TWO types… Implied warranty of merchantability = warranty that the goods are fit for their ORDINARY PURPOSE Key fact: Seller needs to be a “dealer” (i.e. a merchant(and ONLY a merchant) who has SPECIALIZED knowledge abt the PARTICULAR goods in the trxn) Implied warranty of fitness for a PARTICULAR purpose = a warranty that the goods are fit for a PARTICULAR PURPOSE Key facts: Seller (i) KNOWS the buyer has a special use for the good; AND (ii) buyer is RELYING ON THE SELLER to pick out goods suitable for that use NOTE: ANY seller can make an implied warranty of fitness, merchant or not! LIMITATIONS on warranties… 1) Disclaimers: a seller CAN disclaim an implied warrant, BUT CANNOT DISCLAIM an express warranty To disclaim an IMPLIED warranty, K must provide “magic words” (i.e. “as is”; OR “with all faults”)OR by CONSPICUOUS disclaimer To disclaim merchantability, must use the word “merchantability” in disclaimer (NOT the case with fitness) 2) Ltd of Buyer’s Remedies: a seller CAN LTD a buyer’s remedies for breach of ANY warranty (express OR implied) if the ltd is NOT UNCONSCIONABLE EXCEPTION: ltd buyers remedy for PERSONAL INJURY is presumed unconscionable (rebuttable)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

In the LEASE of goods (Art. 2A/UCC), what are the types of LESSORwarranties?

A

THIS IS IN NY ONLY General rule: Same warranties under UCC/Art. 2A as under Art. 2 (i.e. express warranty, merchantability, fitness) EXCEPTION: a “finance lease” where a bank serves as a lessor (after buying from mnfr); here, the warranty is ONLY operating by original mnfr. Limitation on warranty are the SAME as with a sale of goods (Art. 2/UCC) (i.e. disclaimer OR ltd of buyer’s remedies)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Who bears the risk of loss (ROL) in the sale of GOODS (Art. 2/UCC)?

A

Risk of loss = who bears the risk if goods are damaged/destroyed BEFORE buyer gets them? Risk = must still perform buy providing new goods (if seller bears) OR by paying K price nws loss (if buyer bears) HIERARCHY: look for the following things in the ORDER listed… 1) Agreement: the agreement of the parties cntrls as to who shall bear the ROL 2) Breach: the breaching party bears ROL, EVEN IF the loss is unrelated to the breach Defective goods: if buyer properly rejects them, the ROL does NOT pass to buyer until the goods are cured/accepted 3) Delivery by a common carrier (e.g. UPS): ROL SHIFTS to buyer when seller completes its DELIVERY OBLIGATION,WHICH depends on type of K… Shipment K: seller must (i) TRANSPORT goods to a common carrier; (ii) maker delivery ARRANGEMENTS; AND (iii) NOTIFY buyer HERE, buyer bears ROL even before he gets the goods A K is PRESUMED a shipment K, unless otherwise stated Destination K: seller must (i) TRANSPORT goods to a SPECIFIC location (usually, where buyer is located) LOOK for “Free on board” (FOB) often followed by city/place The ROL passes to the buyer AT the named location… If it’s “FOB [city where SELLER is located]”, then it’s a SHIPMENT K If it’s “FOB [any other city]”, then it’s a DESTINATION K 4) Non-carrier cases (e.g. buyer pick up or seller personal delivery): ROL depends on whether seller is a MERCHANT… Merchant seller: seller bears ROL until buyer takes POSSESSION of the goods Non-merchant seller: ROL passes to buyer ONCE seller makes the goods AVAILABLE to the buyer (i.e. the seller “tenders” the goods)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Who bears the risk of loss (ROL) in the LEASE of GOODS (Art. 2A/UCC)?

A

THIS IS IN NY ONLY General rule: the ROL is on the LESSOR EXCEPTION: a “finance lease” where a bank serves as a lessor (after buying from mnfr); here, the ROL is on the LESSEE

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly