Juries and Sentencing Flashcards
Voir dire
pretrial questioning to identify potential jurors; Typically conducted by the prosecutor, defense attorney, and judge
Types of challenges
Challenge to the array - disqualifies the entire jury panel
Challenge for cause - impartiality of individual juror
Peremptory challenge - exclusion for no reason
Jury decision-making
Jury size and unanimous verdict vary by state; Most important factor: interaction between jurors
Verdict-driven: start with informal vote
Evidence-driven: discuss evidence
Hung jury - unable to reach agreement
Reasons for jury discrepancy
Jury more lenient: more sympathetic, disagree with law, or judge knew more information than presented in trial
Jury more punitive: defendant’s demeanor, prior criminal record, or negative view of defendant’s lifestyle
ALL ARE EXTRA-LEGAL THINGS, shouldn’t influence the decision but they do
Death penalty
27 states have the death penalty, 24 use it, 3 are on “hold” bc of their governor
jury nullification
Conscious and deliberate decision of jury to acquit despite awareness that defendant is guilty based on facts and law
Sentencing goals
Retribution, Deterrence, Incapacitation, Rehabilitation, Restoration
Retribution
punished in proportion to harm, “just deserts”; Punishing people as the primary tool, sentencing goal in the US
Deterrence
punishment discourages repeat offenses by individual (specific) as well as others from committing act (general)
Incapacitation
punishment removes individual from society or prevents ability to recommit act
Rehabilitation
punishment intended to transform individual
Restoration
offender compensates victim for harm inflicted
Indeterminate (sentencing)
min and max determined by legislature, judge imposes min and max, parole board reviews and sets actual time; range and discretionary
Determinate (sentencing)
judge establishes actual time within statutory range; structure
Presumptive sentencing guidelines
formula established by legislature, considers nature of crime and criminal history, aggravating and mitigating circumstances considered; aggravating worsens it, mitigating lessens the severity