Judicial Precedent A03 11/14 Flashcards
1
Q
Adv Precedent (certainty)
A
- ✅ Precedent creates certainty because judges follow past decisions so people know how it will be applied to their case.
- Easier for lawyers to advise clients
- Businesses can make financial arrangements
2
Q
Adv Precedent (Practice)
A
- ✅ The Practice Statement points out the importance of certainty
- Adhering to certainty complies with ROL
- Just and fair that cases are decided similarly
- Law is consistent and fair, making it more credible
3
Q
Adv Precedent (COA Power)
A
- ✅ Lord Denning thought the COA should have more power as its often the last appeal court for people due to lack of finances
- This is why it’s good that it’s not bound under YvBA exceptions
- Therefore people would benefit from the COA having greater powers
- Furthermore, appeals to the SC can take over a year, putting people off
- Encourages more people to seek justice
4
Q
Adv Precedent (appeals)
A
- ✅ Stops unnecessary appeals to the SC as COA would be able to overrule previous decision
- Saves money being spent on wasted appeals
- Encourages people to seek justice
- Law Lords generally agree with COA anyway
5
Q
Dis Precedent (inflexible)
A
- ❌ Lower courts having to follow higher courts makes the law inflexible
- Bad decisions are likely to be repeated
- Few cases go to SC, change in law only happens when a party has the courage, persistence and money to appeal there
6
Q
Dis Precedent (finding case law)
A
- ❌ 500,000 reported cases, not easy to find all relevant case law
- Makes the law very complex
- Contradicts ROL (unascertainable)
- Judgements are often very long with no clear distinction between comments
- Difficult to identify the ratio decidendi
- Lack of accessibility makes the law unascertainable (contradicts ROL)
- Distinguishing can lead to small differences and illogical decisions (“hair splitting”)
- Some areas of the law will become very complex undermining the ROL (certainty)
7
Q
Dis precedent (power)
A
- ❌ Judges in COA are reluctant to use their extra power which can restrict the development of the law
- Can be seen through very few cases have used the exceptions from R v Bristol Aeroplane
- Therefore if COA given extra power, unlikely to use it
- Still would be rigidity in the law, errors would remain as most cases don’t reach the SC