Judicial Power Flashcards
What limits the jurisdiction of Federal Courts?
Article III, section 2 of the U.S. Const. - Limited to Law Based Jurisdiction and Party Based Jurisdiction
What is the scope of Article III section 2 ?
Fed. Cts have power over Cases or contro.
(1) Arising under const. laws (fed. st.)
(2) Admiralty & maritime juris.
(3) Where US is P,
(4) b/w 2 or more states
What are the 5 party based sources of federal court jurisdiction?
The fed. courts have jurisdiction over any cases involving:
- The united states as a party
- State v state
- State v. non-citizens
- Citizens of Dif. States & 75K AIC (Diversity)
- Foreign Diplomats
What limitations does the 11th Amendment place on Judicial Power?
Private Individuals can’t sue the States for money damages in federal court
- doesn’t include local gov’t
What steps should you take in examining a claim’s case and controversy requirements?
If the claim fails any of the req., the claim will not be heard
- Is the case ripe?
- Will the court invoke abstention?
- Is the controv. moot?
- Does the claim involve a non-judiciable pol. quest. ?
- Does the party bringing the claim have standing ?
What are the elements required for a party to have standing to bring suit?
- Injury in fact
- Causation
- Redressability
Standing - Injury in fact
∏ must allege and prove actual harm or imm. injury
- Pers. suffered an individualized harm (no 3d P harm)
- Econ. harm is best injury for standing (Monetary Damages)
- For injunctive or declaratory relief must show Likelihood of Future Harm that will be personally suffered
Standing - Causation
∏ must allege & prove ▵’s conduct caused the injury
- “cause in fact” of ∏ injury
Standing - Redressability
Litigation of the claim must remedy or benefit the claimand
What are the steps for analyzing if a third party has standing?
Presenting case of others not ok unless:
- indep. meets other standing req, AND:
- Close Relationship b/w P & 3d party or
- P’s injury adversely affects the P’s relationship w/ 3rd party
When does an organization have Standing?
Org. may sue on behalf of its members if:
(1) Indiv. members have standing to sue in his own right
(2) Interests at stake germane to organization’s purpose
Cases & Contro. Requirements - Advisory Opinions
No advisory Opinions - Fed. ct. can’t issue opinion on abstract or hypo. questions
- MUST be a real & immediate present or future danger
Declaratory Judgments OK - decision by ct. on what legal effect of proposed course of conduct by 1 or both parties would be
- Specific concrete controv. must still exist
When is a lawsuit ripe?
Fed ct. doesn’t have power to hear a suit that’s not ripe for adjudication
- Plaintiff must have an actual injury
- suit must have present case or contro.
- ct. can’t review statute or regulation until its enforced
Why will a federal court refuse to hear the case if a suit is not ripe?
Fed. Court won’t hear a non-ripe case because:
- Fed. Ct. doesn’t issue advisory opinions
When does a legal dispute become moot ?
A suit is moot when it is too late for a court to give remedy to avoid or fix the harm
- There must be a live controv. at all stages of review.
- If injury ends after the suit is filed, it will be dismissed as moot
What is the exception to a case being moot?
- If the injury is Capable of repetition yet evading review
- When injury that occurs is of very short duration (Election laws, roe v. wade)
- Case wont be moot if the injury has the ability to happen over and over again
- D vol. ceases its illegal/wrongful action upon commencement of litigation
- Named plaintiff’s claim in class action suit is resolved
What elements will prohibit a claim resting on a political question from being adjudicated?
Federal Court won’t rule on a matter in controv. if the matter is a political quest. to be resolved by one or both of the other two branches of gov’t
- A pol. question not subject to judicial review arises when:
- The const. has assigned decision making on this subj. to a dif. branch of the government, OR
- The matter is inherently not one that the judiciary can decide
Define the doctrine of abstention
Federal courts give deference to the decisions of State Courts when strong state interests are at stake
In what 2 instances may a federal court abstain from a case?
- Court may refrain from ruling on fed. const. claim that depends on resolving an unsettled issue of state law best left to the state courts
- Pending State Proceedings - Pending if started b/f fed. ct. begun proceeding on merits
- State Criminal Proceedings - Fed Ct. won’t enjoin a pending state criminal ct. proceeding
- Pending st. Civil or Admin. Proceedings - Fed. Ct. shouldn’t enjoin when an important st. interest is involved
Judicial Review of congressional and executive actions
- Can review an act of another branch of govern’t and declare that act unconst.
- Can review the constitutionality of a decision by a state’s highest court
Judicial Review of State Actions
Federal judiciary has the power to review state actions to make sure there is conformity with the const, laws & treaties of the U.S.
Supreme Court’s Jurisdiction
Interprets Const.
- review constitutionality of acts of other branches of fed. gov. (statutes passed by congress & executive actions) to declare them unconst. & prohib. their enforcement
What matters does the Supreme Court have Original Jurisdiction over?
The case may be filed first in the supreme court
- All cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls AND
- those in which a state is a party
How is appellate jurisdiction established in the Supreme Court ?
- Writ of Certiorai
- Direct Appeal
