Joinder of claims and parties Flashcards

1
Q

Joinder of claims

A
  1. multiple claims by one P against one D
  2. Counterclaims
  3. Cross-claims
  4. Impleader claims
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Multiple claims

A

brought by 1 P against 1 D

-P can bring as many claims against D, regardless of relatedness of claims

*If a claim is related to a claim in the suit, the plaintiff must bring the claim, or it is likely precluded.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Counterclaims

A

how a sued party returns fire

two kinds:
1. permissive counterclaim
2. compulsory counterclaim

*All claims have to have independent basis of subject matter jurisdiction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

permissive counterclaim

A

Claim does not arise out of the same transaction or occurrence underlying P’s claims against D.
-D may file a permissive counterclaim but is not required to do so.

*since does not arise out of same transaction as anchor claim, needs to have its own basis for subject-matter jurisdiction.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

compulsory counterclaim

A

Claim does arise out of same transaction or occurrence underlying P’s claim against D.
-D must file or forfeit the claim in future litigation.

*will have supplemental jurisdiction since arises out of same t/o as anchor claim.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Cross-claims

A

Filed by a party against a co-party (D1 v. D2) *across the same side of the v.

-Allowed only if it arises from the same transaction or occurrence underlying one of the plaintiff’s claims.

-Once a related cross is filed, this is the anchor claim. can then file unrelated cross-claims.

-A co-D can counterclaim the cross-claim. Compulsory/permissive rules apply; it does not have to be related.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Impleader

A

D brings a claim against a person not already a party

-Must allege that the third party is responsible for some/all of the liability.
–Ex: contribution (claim against joint tortfeasor), indemnity (claim against insurer).

-D has right to implead within **14 days of serving an answer, or otherwise getting permission from the court.

-After being impleaded, the third person made a party may bring their own claims against others and implead others.
–The original P can also file a claim against the third party (impleaded defendant) if it relates to one of the P’s original claims.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Joinder of parties

A
  1. permissive joinder
  2. mandatory joinder
  3. class actions
  4. Interpleader
  5. Intervention
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

permissive joinder

A

P may join multiple Ps or multiple Ds in one suit, as long as:
1. Joined parties claim relief (if Ps) or face liability (if Ds) that arises out of the same transaction or occurrence; and
2. there will be questions of law or fact relevant to both of their claims

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

mandatory joinder

A

Could be forced to add a party to the suit. 3 steps:

Step 1: Is the absent party necessary?
-Necessary party = Has an interest that might be impaired if left out; complete relief cannot be issued in the party’s absence; or if current parties would be subject to inconsistent/duplicative liability.
–If a party is not necessary, there is no mandatory joinder.
–As a rule, joint tortfeasors are not necessary parties.

step 2: If a missing party is necessary, can the party be joined in federal court?
–If Yes - Court should just join them, adjudicate case, skip Step 3.
–If No - Proceed to Step 3.
*A missing party can’t be joined in federal court if the court lacks PJ over the missing party, or adding the party would destroy SMJ by destroying diversity.

step 3: If a party cannot be joined, are they indispensable?
-The court will consider:
The extent of prejudice to the missing party;
whether the prejudice can be lessened by shaping the relief in a certain way; and
if the case is dismissed, whether the plaintiff can find relief in another forum.
–If Yes – must dismiss the suit.
–If No – court can adjudicate the case in the party’s absence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Class Actions

A

One person (the representative) can litigate on behalf of a group (class) if:
(1) A class can be formed, and
(2) The action brought is proper for resolution via class action.

-Court must have PJ over every D and over the named P.

-SMJ: When alleging a state law violation, the class can appear in federal court only if the Ds and representative Ps (not all members) are completely diverse.

-Judgment binds all class members unless they opt out.

-Notice: In common-question class actions, class members must be given notice of the pendency of the suit, usually through mail or publication.

  • a settlement of a class action be approved by the court.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

how to form class actions

A

To form a class, 4 requirements must be met:*

  1. Numerosity: So many claimants that joinder is impractical;
  2. Commonality: Questions of law or fact common to the class;
  3. Typicality: Representative’s claims are typical of class members, ensuring the representative will have an incentive to litigate in ways to protect the class; and
  4. Representativeness: Representative parties will fairly and adequately protect the interests of the class.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

resolution of class action proper if

A
  1. Separate actions would create a risk of inconsistent judgments or judgments would impair nonparties from protecting their interests.
  2. The opposing party has acted in ways generally applicable to the class (not likely to work if seeking $$).
  3. The court finds that common questions of law or fact predominate over individualized questions, and a class action is superior to other methods for a fair/efficient result.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Interpleader

A

allows a property holder to initiate a suit to compel multipple claimants to that property to litigate the dispute.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

intervention

A

Non-party is interested, but has not been joined.

Intervention of right: A party must be permitted to intervene upon timely application when:
(1) The party claims an interest relating to the subject matter of the action, and
(2) Without intervention, there is a risk that they might not be able to protect that interest.

Permissive intervention: Upon timely application and at the court’s discretion, a party may intervene with a claim or defense that shares with the main action a common question of law or fact as long as you do not ruin jurisdiction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Joinder and SMJ, PJ, and Venue

A
  • SMJ: Necessary for every claim, whether it be a counterclaim, cross-claim, impleader claim, or any other claim in a lawsuit.

-PJ: Necessary for every party. (Remember, in class actions, class members are not “parties” for the purposes of personal jurisdiction; only the lead plaintiffs are parties.) Thus, if a plaintiff sues multiple defendants, or a defendant impleads a third party, the court must ascertain whether each and every party before it is subject to the power of the court.
–Bulge Rule: An impleaded defendant will be subject to the personal jurisdiction of a federal court if, in addition to any other ground for personal jurisdiction, the impleaded defendant is served with process within 100 miles of the courthouse where the suit is pending.

-Venue: Unlike SMJ and PJ, the law of venue need only be consulted when the lawsuit is filed. If claims are joined after the initial filing, those claims generally may not be challenged for being brought in an improper venue. (One exception is Rule 19 where if the joined party objects to venue and adding the party makes venue improper, the court must dismiss the joined party.)