Issues And Debates Flashcards
Gender bias
The differential treatment or representation of men and women based on stereotypes rather than real difference
Alpha Bias
A tendency to exaggerate differences between men and women, suggesting that there are real and enduring differences between the two sexes. The consequences are that theories devalue one gender in comparison to the other, but typically devalue women
Beta bias
this occurs when the differences between men and women are minimised. This often happens when findings obtained from men are applied to women without additional validation.
Androcentrism
taking male thinking/behaviour as normal, regarding female thinking/behaviour as deviant, inferiour, abnormal, ‘other’ when it is different.
Positive Consequences of Gender Bias
Alpha Bias:
* Has led to some theorists (Gilligan) to assert the worth and valuation ‘feminine qualities’.
* Has led to healthy criticism of cultural values that praise certain ‘male’ qualities such as aggression and individualism as desirable, adaptive and universal.
Beta Bias:
* Makes people see men and women as the same, which has led to equal treatment in legal terms and equal access to, for example, education and employment.
Negative Consequences of Gender Bias
Alpha Bias:
• Focus on differences between genders leads to the implication of similarity WITHIN genders, thus this ignores the many ways women differ from each other.
• Can sustain prejudices and stereotypes.
Beta Bias:
• Draws attention away from the differences in power between men and women.
• Is considered as an egalitarian approach but it results in major misrepresentations of both genders.
Evidence Consequences of Gender Bias
Kitzinger (1998) argue that questions about sex differences aren’t just scientific questions – they’re also political (women have same rights as men). So gender differences distorted to maintain the status quo of male power.
• Women kept out of male-dominant universities.
• Women were oppressed.
• Women stereotypes (Bowlby).
Examples of gender bias research: (Freud)
Freud’s ideas are seen as inherently gender biased, but it must be remembered that he was a product of his time. He saw ‘Biology as destiny’ and women’s roles as prescribed & predetermined.
All his theories are androcentric, most obviously: -‘Penis envy’ – women are defined psychologically by the fact that they aren’t men.
But Freud’s ideas had serious consequences/implications they reinforced stereotypes e.g. of women’s moral Inferiority, treated deviations from traditional sex-role behaviour as pathological (career ambition = penis envy) and are clearly androcentric (phallocentric).
Examples of gender bias research: (Kohlberg & Moral Development)
Kohlberg based his stages of moral development around male moral reasoning and had an all-male sample. He then inappropriately generalized his findings to women (beta bias) and also claimed women generally reached lower level of moral development (androcentrism).
Carol Gilligan highlighted the gender bias inherent in Kohlberg’s work and suggested women make moral decisions in a different way to men (care ethic vs. justice ethic).
However, her research is, arguably, also (alpha) biased, as male and female moral reasoning is more similar than her work suggests.
Examples of gender bias research: (Biomedical Theories of Abnormality)
In women, mental illness, especially depression, is much more likely to be explained in terms of neurochemical/hormonal processes, rather than other possible explanations such as social or environmental (e.g. domestic violence, unpaid labour, discrimination).
The old joke ‘Is it your hormones, love?’ is no joke for mentally ill women!
Institutional sexism
• Although female psychology students outnumber male, at a seniour teaching and research level in universities, men dominate. Men predominate at seniour researcher level.
• Research agenda follows male concerns, female concerns may be marginalised or ignored.
Use of standardised procedures in research studies
• Most experimental methodologies are based around standardised treatment of participants. This assumes that men and women respond in the same ways to the experimental situation.
• Women and men might respond differently to research situation. • Women and men might be treated differently by researchers.
• Could create artificial differences or mask real ones.
Dissemination of research results through academic journals
• Research that finds gender differences more likely to get published than that which doesn’t.
• Exaggerates extent of gender differences.
. Publishing bias towards positive results.
The Feminist perspective
• Re-examining the ‘facts’ about gender.
• View of women as normal humans, not deficient men.
• Skepticism towards biological determinism.
• Research agenda focusing on women’s’ concerns.
• A psychology for women, rather than a psychology of women.
Emic Construct
An emic construct is one that is applied to only in one cultural group, so they vary from place to place (differences between cultures).
Emic Approach
An emic approach refers to the investigation of a culture from within the culture itself. This means that research of European society from a European perspective is emic, and African society by African researchers in Africa is also emic. An emic approach is more likely to have ecological validity as the findings are less likely to be distorted or caused by a mismatch between the cultures of the researchers and the culture being investigated.
Culture bias
Culture bias can occur when a researcher assumes that an emic construct (behaviour specific to a single culture) is actually an etic (behaviour universal to all cultures).
Etics
An etic construct is a theoretical idea that is assumed to apply in all cultural groups. Therefore, etic constructs are considered universal to all people, and are factors that hold across all cultures (similarities between cultures).
Etic constructs assume that most human behaviour is common to humans but that cultural factors influence the development or display of this behaviour.
Ethnocentrism
Ethnocentrism occurs when a researcher assumes that their own culturally specific practices or ideas are ‘natural’ or ‘right’. The individual uses their own ethnic group to evaluate and make judgments about other individuals from other ethnic groups. Research which is ‘centred’ around one cultural group is called ‘ethnocentric’.
When other cultures are observed to differ from the researcher’s own, they may be regarded in a negative light e.g. ‘primitive’, ‘degenerate’, ‘unsophisticated’, ‘undeveloped’ etc.
This becomes racism when other cultures are denigrated or their traditions regarded as irrelevant etc.
The antidote to ethnocentrism is cultural relativism, which is an approach to treating each culture as unique and worthy of study.
Cultural relativism
Cultural relativism is the principle of regarding the beliefs, values, and practices of a culture from the viewpoint of that culture itself. The principle is sometimes practiced to avoid cultural bias in research, as well as to avoid judging another culture by the standards of one’s own culture. For this reason, cultural relativism has been considered an attempt to avoid ethnocentrism.
Culturally Biased Research(Ainsworth’s Strange Situation for Attachment)
The strange situation procedure is not appropriate for assessing children from non-US or UK populations as it is based on Western childrearing ideals (i.e. ethnocentric).
The original study only used American, middle-class, white, home-reared infants and mothers therefore the generalisability of the findings could be questioned as well as whether this procedure would be valid for other cultures too.
Cultural differences in child-rearing styles make results liable to misinterpretation e.g. German or Japanese samples.
Takahshi (1990) aimed to see whether the strange situation is a valid procedure for cultures other than the original. Takashi found no children in the avoidant-insecure stage, this could be explained in cultural terms as Japanese children are taught that such behaviour is impolite and the would be actively discouraged from displaying it. Also because Japanese children experience much less separation, the SSC was more than mildly stressful.
Culturally Biased Research
(IQ testing and Research (e.g. Eysenck))
An example of an etic approach which produces bias might be the imposition of IQ tests designed within one culture on another culture. If a test is designed to measure a European’s understanding of what intelligence is it may not be a valid measurement of an African’s , or Asian’s intelligence.
IQ tests developed in the West contain embedded assumptions about intelligence, but what counts as ‘intelligent’ behaviour varies from culture to culture.
Non-Westerners may be disadvantaged by such tests – and then viewed as ‘inferiour’ when then don’t perform as Westerners do.